Today, Joseph takes on one of the most common arguments for God’s existence: vibes. He explores why deeply felt spiritual experiences—no matter how sincere or transformative—don’t automatically qualify as evidence. Drawing comparisons to ghost sightings, alien abductions, and even courtroom standards, the discussion unpacks the difference between subjective conviction and objective proof. From confirmation bias to emotional manipulation in religious settings, this episode examines how human psychology shapes belief and why powerful internal experiences occur across conflicting religions. The central challenge is clear: moving from “I felt something” to “Therefore, God exists” is a leap that requires more than sincerity. Personal faith may provide meaning and comfort—but if belief in God is to persuade beyond the believer, it must rest on arguments and evidence that stand independent of individual feelings.