
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Summary of https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-025-00883-8
This academic paper argues from a Deweyan perspective that artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in its current commercial Intelligent Tutoring System form, is unlikely to democratize education.
The author posits that while proponents focus on AI's potential to increase access to quality education, a truly democratic education, as defined by John Dewey, requires cultivating skills for democratic living, providing experience in communication and cooperation, and allowing for student participation in shaping their education.
The paper suggests that the emphasis on individualization, mastery of curriculum, and automation of teacher tasks in current educational AI tools hinders the development of these crucial democratic aspects, advocating instead for public development of AI that augments teachers' capabilities and fosters collaborative learning experiences.
By ibl.ai5
33 ratings
Summary of https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-025-00883-8
This academic paper argues from a Deweyan perspective that artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in its current commercial Intelligent Tutoring System form, is unlikely to democratize education.
The author posits that while proponents focus on AI's potential to increase access to quality education, a truly democratic education, as defined by John Dewey, requires cultivating skills for democratic living, providing experience in communication and cooperation, and allowing for student participation in shaping their education.
The paper suggests that the emphasis on individualization, mastery of curriculum, and automation of teacher tasks in current educational AI tools hinders the development of these crucial democratic aspects, advocating instead for public development of AI that augments teachers' capabilities and fosters collaborative learning experiences.