Res Ipsa Loquitur

Springfree Trampoline v Forostenko


Listen Later

In this episode we consider the recent case decided by the Queensland Court of Appeal of Springfree Trampoline v Forostenko [2024] QCA 255, which involved a claim brought in negligence and s138 of the Australian Consumer Law against Springfree Trampoline for a trampoline accident on the basis that it was alleged there were safety defects owing to defective warnings given about the trampoline's design features and risks of suffering foot injuries.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Res Ipsa LoquiturBy Paul Czarnota