
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Source : https://goombalab.github.io/blog/2025/tradeoffs/
This source explores the fundamental differences and trade-offs between State Space Models (SSMs) and Transformers, particularly in the context of sequence modeling and large language models (LLMs).
It defines SSMs by their three key ingredients: state size, state expressivity, and training efficiency, contrasting their compressed, constant-size hidden state with the Transformer's linear-scaling token cache.
The author argues that Transformers are best suited for pre-compressed, semantically meaningful data, while SSMs excel in raw, high-resolution data due to their compressive inductive bias.
Ultimately, the piece proposes that hybrid models combining both architectures may offer superior performance by leveraging their complementary strengths, akin to how human intelligence utilizes both fluid memory and external references.
By Benjamin Alloul πͺ π
½π
Ύππ
΄π
±π
Ύπ
Ύπ
Ίπ
»π
ΌSource : https://goombalab.github.io/blog/2025/tradeoffs/
This source explores the fundamental differences and trade-offs between State Space Models (SSMs) and Transformers, particularly in the context of sequence modeling and large language models (LLMs).
It defines SSMs by their three key ingredients: state size, state expressivity, and training efficiency, contrasting their compressed, constant-size hidden state with the Transformer's linear-scaling token cache.
The author argues that Transformers are best suited for pre-compressed, semantically meaningful data, while SSMs excel in raw, high-resolution data due to their compressive inductive bias.
Ultimately, the piece proposes that hybrid models combining both architectures may offer superior performance by leveraging their complementary strengths, akin to how human intelligence utilizes both fluid memory and external references.