Ecology has a near-ironclad law called competitive exclusion: two species occupying the same niche in the same environment cannot coexist indefinitely. One outcompetes the other — not because it’s better, but because even tiny adaptive advantages compound over time.

The losing species doesn’t always die. More often, it shifts. Example: way back in the day, wolves and coyotes were competing for the same terrain. They overlapped. Over time, both adapted. Today, wolves take large prey in deep forests. Coyotes hunt smaller prey at the edges. Same landscape. Resolved overlap. Complementary roles. Ecologists describe these shifts as niche partitioning — and when traits actually diverge due to competition, character displacement.⁴ It’s how nature converts competition into cooperation.

The “thing behind the thing” insight: species don’t decide to specialize. The system pressures them into it. Scarcity—not abundance—drives differentiation.

What This Means for Organizations - read or listen to the full episode to find out.

---

Thank you for coming on this journey with me these past 9 weeks. I hope you are finding it as interesting and informative as I am. I’d love to here your reactions and extrapolations in the comments here, on Substack, or LinkedIn.

Sources:

¹ U.S. Energy Information Administration, “U.S. electricity customers averaged five and one-half hours of power interruptions in 2022,” November 2023.

² WIRED, “Why US Power Bills Are Surging,” 2025.

³ KBIA, “Higher electricity bills driving inflation, consumer frustration,” February 2025; The Century Foundation, “Fueling Debt: How Rising Utility Costs Are Overwhelming American Families,” 2025.

⁴ Ecologists have documented niche partitioning and interference competition between wolves and coyotes across shared landscapes. See: Mastro, L.L., “Evolution in coyotes in response to the megafaunal extinctions,” PNAS, 2011; Newsome, T.M. & Ripple, W.J., “Interference competition between wolves and coyotes during variable prey abundance,” Ecology and Evolution, 2021.

⁵ National Hydropower Association, “Winter 2021 Storm Event in Texas: An Assessment of the Energy System Reliability Failures,” 2021.

⁶ Introl, “PJM’s 6GW Capacity Shortfall: The Grid Crisis That Could Reshape Energy Markets,” 2025.

⁷ Reuters, “US grid rules for faster data centers favor on-site gas plants,” January 2026.

⁸ World Economic Forum, “Energy experts on building the power systems of the future,” January 2026.

Connections to The Insider’s Guide to Innovation at Microsoft

* Language as strategic tool — How you name the intervention shapes how people experience it. “Reorganization” signals top-down assignment. “Differentiation” signals agency.

* Assumption mapping — Overlapping teams often exist because the original rationale has changed but the structure hasn’t. Revisiting assumptions is how you find the niches that no longer need to exist.

* Double-loop learning — The practice of asking “Now that we know what we know, what is possible?” breaks conservation-phase thinking and opens the door to differentiation.

* Biomimicry — The adaptive cycle: meadow → forest → release → reorganization. Niche overlap accumulates in the forest phase. Scarcity initiates the release.

* Boundary Crossers — The people who manage the interchange between differentiated teams, translating across niches so that specialized groups can exchange value without losing their distinctiveness.

This piece is part of Innovating Out Loud, a weekly practice of sharing research and sense-making at early iterations rather than polished conclusions — a companion to the monthly IOL webcast. Register at regenerouslabs.com/innovatingoutloud.

AI Disclosure: This piece was researched with Perplexity and written and edited with my custom Claude writing partners. The ideas, research direction, and editorial judgment are mine. Audio is me too, flubs and all.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit innovatingoutloud.substack.com