Upgrade to annual for 50% off!

Offer is valid through the month of June!

Hit the button to see what’s included!

Join the chat!

Inside, we break down the mental leaks behind overtrading, hesitation, revenge trading, fear, ego, self sabotage, and inconsistency. We use frameworks, reflection, and honest discussion to turn trading psychology into something practical.

The articles give the framework. The chat is where we do the work.

The chat now behaves as a multi-thread discussion forum, where we not only have 1:1 talks but also members have access to the prop firm journal, where I record the journey from eval —> Funded

Join me inside!

Transcript:

Welcome to the Observer AI-hosted podcast where we discuss the psychology around trading, markets, finance, and more. Today we are taking a deep dive into the real mechanics of trading psychology. And I want to start by painting a picture that I guarantee you have experienced if you have spent any time at the screens.

Oh, absolutely. Everyone has a story like this. Right.

So picture this. It’s a quiet Tuesday morning. The market is just, it’s barely moving.

Your watch list is completely flat. You are sitting there staring at the charts and you have done absolutely nothing for two hours. The boredom is thick and then it hits you.

It’s this deep, restless itch. You start scrolling through charts. You do not even trade.

You start dropping down to the one minute timeframe, just looking for, I don’t know, some kind of price action. Yeah. You’re hunting at that point.

Exactly. And before you know it, you find yourself hovering over the buy button on a setup you would normally completely ignore. You just want to feel like you were doing something.

Yeah. It is the classic trap for anyone sitting alone at a desk. You take a trade, like literally any trade, just to justify your existence as a trader for the day.

Right. It’s like, I’m here. I should be working.

Exactly. You feel this subtle pressure that if you are not in the market, you aren’t working. But the reality of that moment and the biological process happening in your brain right then has absolutely nothing to do with finding a high probability setup.

Or making money, honestly. Right. It’s entirely a mechanism for emotional regulation.

You’re clicking a button to alleviate the physical discomfort of boredom and uncertainty. Wow. And, you know, that gets right to the core mission of our deep dive today.

We’re talking directly to you, the beginner retail trader, because for years, the industry has fed retail traders this very superficial, almost, I don’t know, motivational poster level of advice. Oh, the just do better advice? Yeah. You take a bad trade because you were bored and the advice you get is just be more disciplined, follow your rules.

And we are throwing that out today. It’s useless. It really is.

So we’re going to approach trading psychology as a serious institutional grade decision process. We want to uncover exactly why your execution breaks down the second uncertainty hits. And more importantly, how to actually fix it.

But I do have to push back a little right out of the gate here. Sure. Go for it.

Doesn’t basic discipline actually work? I mean, if I know my rules and I just grit my teeth and force myself to follow them, isn’t that enough to stop me from taking that bored Tuesday morning trade? Well, I mean, if trading were a purely logical exercise, sure, yes, discipline would be enough. But you’re a biological organism. You’re interacting with an environment of constant financial threat and reward.

Yeah, that’s true. So the traditional trading psychology model fails so miserably because it treats execution errors as a motivational failing. Like it makes a structural process error sound like a moral shortcoming.

Like you’re just a weak person if you break a rule. Exactly. And think about the implications of that.

You can be a highly motivated individual. You can care deeply about your process. You can want to succeed more than anything in the world.

And you’ll still find yourself widening a stop loss just to find emotional relief in the middle of a choppy session. Because it hurts to take the loss. Right.

A trader doesn’t widen a stop because they suddenly lack ambition. They do it because the biological pressure of uncertainty, you know, the cortisol flooding their system, it just becomes louder than their strategic plan. That makes me think of a medical analogy.

Telling a retail trader to just be disciplined when their nervous system is actively reacting to the threat of a live trade. It feels like telling a patient with a severe bacterial infection to just stop having a fever. That is a perfect analogy.

Right. Because it misses the entire structural problem. You are yelling at the symptom, but you’re completely ignoring the underlying infection.

And that is the crucial shift every serious trader has to make. You have to stop diagnosing the symptoms and start diagnosing the underlying mechanisms. Mechanisms.

OK. Yeah. When a trader comes to me and says, I struggle with self-sabotage or I have a problem with revenge trading, they’re naming symptoms.

Those are the fevers. So what’s the infection then? The mechanisms. The actual psychological drivers beneath those actions.

Things like relief seeking, uncertainty and tolerance or identity threat. Wait, let me make sure I’m following this. You’re saying self-sabotage isn’t an actual psychological mechanism? Because I always thought of it as the singular demon that just ruins my trading.

Not at all. Self-sabotage is a cluster of symptoms. And honestly, the behaviors can look entirely different from one trader to the next.

Let’s look at two completely different individuals. OK. Trader A gets into a drawdown, their chest tightens, they freeze up and they literally cannot click the mouse to take the next valid A plus setup.

The deer in the headlights. Exactly. Now, trader B takes a loss, their face flushes, they get aggressive and they immediately fire off three over-leveraged trades on a random ticker to win it back.

Right. Going on full tilt. Yeah.

Now, on the surface, these look like opposite problems. One is withdrawing and one is aggressively compensating. But if we drill down to the biological mechanism, both traders are doing the exact same thing.

Which is what? They are both trying to reduce the discomfort of uncertainty just using different escape routes. Precisely. Trader A escapes the pain of uncertainty by refusing to participate.

Trader B attempts to escape the pain by trying to force the market to give them their money back right now. So the uncertainty ends. Oh, wow.

So neither of them is actually looking at the market anymore? Not at all. Neither of them is actually reading the structural reality of the chart. They’re just medicating their nervous system.

The market ceases to be an environment of probabilities and just becomes a highly inefficient tool for emotional relief. And the market is a very, very expensive place to seek therapy. Very expensive.

So if I am sitting at my desk at home, I need to look for these mechanisms instead of just writing I lacked discipline in my journal. But how do I know when a mechanism is hijacking my decision-making process mid-trade? What is actually happening in my brain the second I click buy that makes me throw my pre-market plan out the window? Well, to understand that, we have to look at how a trade fundamentally changes psychological character the second it goes live. And this brings us to a mechanism called reference points and anchor collisions.

Okay. Anchor collisions. Break that down for me.

So when you were doing your pre-market prep, your reference point is objective. It is the chart. But the moment you put capital at risk, your brain creates new emotional anchors.

Let’s say you take a perfectly planned trade in the first hour of the morning and it stops you out for a $500 loss. Ouch. Okay.

You tell yourself, okay, normal variance. I’ll just wait for the next clean setup. But the next setup isn’t really a fresh start, is it? It never is.

The setup appears, you enter, and it starts working in your favor. But psychologically, you are no longer just managing a standalone opportunity. That trade has instantly transformed into a repair mission.

Ugh. A repair mission. Your brain is no longer anchoring to your entry price or your technical targets.

Your new reference point is getting back to break even for the day. You are trying to erase that minus 500 from your daily PNL. Which means I am no longer trading the structural reality of the market.

I am literally just trading my emotional relationship to the break even point. And this is where we see anchor collisions. You are trying to manage a live position, but your brain is filtering every tick through a stack of emotionally loaded reference points.

Because I’ve got my entry price. You have an anchor tied to your entry price, another tied to your daily loss limit, and maybe another tied to the unrealized profit you saw on the screen five minutes ago but didn’t secure it. Oh, that is the worst feeling.

Right. The brain becomes overwhelmed by these conflicting anchors and rational decision making just collapses. You know, that structural collapse explains a lot about the data we see on retail traders.

I mean, the numbers show pretty reliably that retail traders cut their winners way too early and they hold their losers way too long. The industry calls it loss realization asymmetry. I always assumed that was just, you know, a manifestation of fear and greed.

It is much more mechanical than abstract concepts like fear and greed. It is a biological avoidance mechanism. How so? Think about it.

When you have a green trade, closing it secures the win and provides an immediate hit of dopamine. But more importantly, it provides instant emotional relief from the anxiety that the market might reverse and take those profits away. Oh, right.

The brain just wants the anxiety to stop. Exactly. The brain wants that relief.

So you click sell too early. But when you have a red trade, it operates on a completely different psychological axis. Because as long as the position is open, the loss isn’t technically real yet.

Exactly. While the trade is open, the loss is just a floating number. It is hypothetical in the brain’s risk center.

But clicking sell? Clicking sell and closing a losing position forces the brain to process the financial and ego damage as an undeniable reality. It makes the physical and emotional pain official. It finalizes the failure.

So holding a bleeding red trade isn’t a strategic choice. I’m not like, I tell myself I’m giving the trade room to breathe, but I am literally just holding onto the position to delay the realization of emotional pain. Yes.

Even if it blows up my account, I am choosing the lingering anxiety of a massive drawdown over the sharp final pain of admitting I was wrong. That is the dark reality of the mechanism. You will risk financial ruin just to postpone ego damage.

And this avoidance is heavily amplified by another massive psychological mechanism. The illusion of control. Okay.

The illusion of control. I want to dig into this because as a trader, I put a lot of work in. I sit there for two hours before the opening bell, I read the macroeconomic news, I draw my support and resistance zones, I check the relative volume, I meticulously calculate my position size.

You do the work. I do. It feels like I am doing everything right.

So how does all that preparation become a trap? Because the human brain is evolutionarily wired to conflate involvement with authority. And the trading environment is uniquely designed to foster this illusion. What do you mean? Well, if you go to a casino and play roulette, you know the outcome is entirely random.

You place your chip, the wheel spins, and you accept that you have zero control. But trading is not roulette. Skill actually does matter.

Pattern recognition matters. Statistical edge matters. But it’s not entirely controllable either.

Even an A-plus setup can fail just because a large institution decided to liquidate a position at that exact second. And that middle ground, where skill matters but outcomes are still random on a trade by trade basis, is highly toxic for the human ego. Because you are heavily involved, because you drew the trend lines and read the data, your brain tricks you into believing you can actually manage the outcome.

I start to feel like my personal involvement grants me authority over where the price goes. Precisely. You start confusing your analysis with control.

I feel like I have my hands on the steering wheel of the market. And I can see how that grandiosity leads to terrible execution. If I believe I am steering the car, I might size up way too heavily, because I am certain this level will hold.

Or you refuse to accept a loss. Yeah, because I feel like my meticulous preparation dictates that the market must bounce here. It’s like I lose all perspective.

In an institutional prop firm, how do they handle this? Because I imagine even professionals face this illusion. Oh, they absolutely do. But in an institutional setting, they don’t rely on the trader’s willpower to break the illusion.

Instead, they use risk managers. The risk manager acts as an external thermostat. Ah, I like that analogy.

The external thermostat. Yeah. If an institutional trader starts running too hot, if they start taking oversized positions or showing signs of tilt, the risk manager steps in and physically cuts their risk.

They tap them on the shoulder, tell them to take a walk, and they stop the trader from boiling over. They regulate the environment. Exactly.

The thermostat regulates the environment when the trader loses the ability to regulate themselves. But the retail trader is sitting alone in a room. There is no tap on the shoulder.

There is no external thermostat. None at all. For the retail trader, your internal thermostat drifts without you even realizing it.

The emotional temperature goes up degree by degree. You take a paper cut loss, then another, then you take a slightly bigger loss. And then you’re sweating.

Suddenly, your heart rate is elevated. Your vision is narrowed to the flashing PNL. And you aren’t managing price action anymore.

You are solely managing your own emotional discomfort. And you have entirely crossed the line from trading probabilities to throwing darts. Man, that’s scary.

So if my brain is constantly trying to trick me, and I don’t have a risk manager standing behind me to act as a thermostat, how do I even know when these mechanisms are hijacking my session? I mean, I can’t see my own blind spots while I’m in the middle of a trade. That is why the most critical tool for a retail trader isn’t their charting software. It is their review process.

But here’s the catch. The catch or review process is entirely 100% dependent on the language you use to describe your actions. Language precision.

Yes. If you want to build an external thermostat at home, it starts with language precision. You mean how I write in my trading journal at the end of the day.

Yes. If your journal is full of weak, soft language, you are not reviewing your trading. You are just protecting your ego.

Soft language is the death of improvement because it hides the mechanisms we just talked about. Give me an example of soft language. I read retail trading journals all the time, and I constantly see entries like, I got a little emotional today, or I just need more patience on that setup, or this is a classic, I adapted to the volatility in protected capital.

Wait, but I protected capital sounds incredibly professional. Like if I close a trade early because the market looks choppy and I write that down, I feel like I made a mature business decision. Why is that soft language? Because if the sentence in your journal sounds respectable, but it completely obscures the biological reality of what you actually did, it is not precise enough.

I protected capital is often a sophisticated cover-up for I panicked. We have to look at the contrast between soft language and precise language. Soft language is saying, I got emotional.

Precise language is forcing yourself to write, I started managing my discomfort through the trade once the open profit felt emotionally loaded. Oof, that is deeply uncomfortable to write. Or like instead of writing, I needed more patience today, the precise version would be, I delayed accepting my technical invalidation level because realizing the financial loss felt worse to my ego than carrying more risk.

Exactly. Notice how the precision strips away the flattering narrative. It forces a brutal, inescapable confrontation with your actual behavior.

You can’t fix a problem if you dress it up in a suit and tie. You have to expose the raw mechanics of the error. You know, this brings up something I am genuinely confused about.

I look at the demographics of retail traders today. We are talking about engineers, doctors, software developers. Smart people.

Yeah, these are highly analytical, intelligent people with advanced degrees. Why are they the ones writing, I adapted to volatility, instead of diagnosing the mechanism? Shouldn’t a smart, highly verbal person be better at this kind of self-analysis? You would think so, but intelligence is actually a massive vulnerability in trading psychology. What you are describing is a phenomenon called motivated reasoning, and it puts intelligent, highly verbal traders at a severe disadvantage.

A disadvantage. How does being smart make you worse at reviewing your trades? Because the brain’s primary objective is to protect the ego from damage. If you have a high intellect and a great vocabulary, your brain doesn’t use those tools to seek the objective truth of why you failed.

It uses those tools to invent incredibly sophisticated, rational-sounding excuses for terrible behavior. So my brain is basically acting like a highly paid defense attorney for my ego. If I commit a crime against my trading rules, my inner lawyer steps in and uses all my market knowledge to argue that it wasn’t a mistake, it was actually a brilliant tactical adjustment.

That is a brilliant analogy, yes. You take an impulsive revenge trade, and your inner lawyer calls it market responsiveness. You hold a massive loser all afternoon, and the lawyer calls it long-term conviction.

Oh man, I’ve used that one. We all have. You panic and take profits way too early on a trending stock, and the lawyer calls it active trade management.

The lawyer in your head is so good at arguing the case that you actually believe your own lies. It’s terrifying. It is.

You write down these elegant, complex explanations in your journal, and you log off feeling like you did a great job reviewing your day. But I didn’t fix the mechanism at all. You did the exact opposite.

You reinforced it. You allowed your biological relief-seeking behavior to borrow the language of professional maturity. And when you do that, your review process ceases to be a tool for improvement.

It just becomes a tool for recovering your dignity after taking a loss. Okay, that is a gut punch. So the prescription here is that we have to use ruthlessly precise, ugly language to reveal the truth of our reactions.

But I’ll be honest, once you strip away that defense attorney and see the raw truth of your impulsivity, it can be really painful. How do we sit with that truth in real time while the market is moving without spiraling? By structurally shifting your perspective and building what we call the observer mindset. This is the ultimate goal of trading psychology.

The observer mindset. Okay. It is the practice of creating a permanent gap between what the market does and how your body reacts to it.

It is the learned ability to step back and watch an emotion arise in your nervous system without actually becoming that emotion. Let’s break that down because I think understanding the stages of this is where the rubber meets the road for the listener. There are three levels of awareness in this process.

Level one is just reaction. What does that actually feel like? Level one is where almost all beginner traders live. At this stage, you are entirely identified with your emotions.

There’s zero gap. No gap at all. Right.

A massive red candle prints on the chart. Fear hits your nervous system. Your stunning drops and your hand immediately clicks sell.

You do not experience the thought, I am feeling afraid. You simply are the fear. The emotion and the action are fused into one single event.

Got it. Then there’s level two, which is recognition. This is where you start doing the journal reviews and realizing you have a problem, I guess.

Yes. Level two is recognition. You start to notice the reaction as it happens, the red candle prints, and you feel the fear in your chest.

You might even say out loud, I am panicking right now. Okay, so you know the emotion is there. You know it’s present, but it still dictates your behavior.

You recognize the fear, but it still holds the steering wheel. You click sell anyway, knowing it’s a mistake as you do it. Ah, that is a frustrating stage.

Which brings us to the final stage, level three, observation. Observation is the holy grail. This is where you notice the fear arising.

You feel your chest tighten. You acknowledge the thought, my brain is telling me to exit this trade because I’m afraid of losing money. But you step back.

You create the gap. Exactly. You let the physical sensation of anxiety exist in your body, but you completely sever its connection to your mouse hand.

You observe the feeling as a piece of data, but you follow your technical trading plan anyway. I want to clarify a huge misconception here. A lot of beginner traders hear disconnect from your emotions, and they think the goal is to become this fearless, ice-cold, emotionless robot.

And the irony is, trying to suppress your feelings and feel nothing is usually what leads to a massive, account-blowing meltdown. Oh, attempting to suppress emotion is entirely a fool’s errand. You are a biological organism facing real financial risk.

Your amygdala is going to fire. You’re going to feel things. You can’t turn it off.

No. The observer mindset is not about feeling nothing. It is about not being commanded by what you feel.

You allow the emotion to be a passenger in the car, but you absolutely refuse to let it drive. And institutional traders use very specific frameworks to enforce this gap between feeling and acting. Let’s get into those actionable frameworks.

If I am sitting at my desk, my PNL is bleeding, and my heart rate is spiking, how do I actually force that gap into existence? What is the physical step? One of the most effective tools is the stage-shift audit. This is about catching the biological trigger before it manifests as a trading error. When you feel your body tense up, you have to actively name the state that has just become active.

Speak it out loud. Out loud? Like, in my room alone? Yes. Are you feeling urgency? Are you feeling a sense of revenge from a previous loss? Are you overstimulated by a fast-moving tape? If you cannot accurately name the emotional state you are currently in, your execution decisions over the next five minutes should be treated as highly suspicious.

That’s fascinating. It’s an internal audit. I have to literally say, I am entering a state of revenge before I am allowed to interact with the market.

And the second framework, which sounds simple but I know is excruciating, is the pause. The pause is mandatory. It is the insertion of a hard three-second gap between the impulse to click the mouse and actually clicking it.

In those three seconds, you take your hand off the mouse, and you ask yourself one brutally honest question. Does this decision serve my strategic process? Or does it just relieve my current emotional pressure? Am I trading the structural reality of the chart, or am I just trading my pain? Precisely. But, I have to say, acknowledging the reality of the trader at home, when the screen is flashing red and you are losing hundreds of dollars a tick, three seconds feels like an absolute eternity.

Taking your hand off the mouse when every fiber of your being is screaming at you to do something is agonizing. It is agonizing. It requires immense effort.

But those three seconds are all it takes to switch processing power from your emotional brain back to your executive logical brain. If you demand that pause of yourself, you break the cycle of self-sabotage. It re-engages the logic.

Exactly. And that brings all of our concepts together. If you use precise language in your journaling, you will spot the mechanisms.

If you spot the mechanisms, you can anticipate the state shift. And if you anticipate the state shift, you can use the pause to observe the emotion instead of reacting to it. That perfectly connects the entire framework.

Let’s summarize the core academic thesis of our deep dive today. You absolutely cannot fix your trading by just trying to be more disciplined. That is a superficial trap.

A complete trap. You fix your execution by diagnosing the underlying biological mechanisms like relief-seeking, loss-realization asymmetry, and anchor collisions. You use ruthlessly precise, uncomfortable language in your self-reviews to strip away your ego’s clever defense attorney.

And you use tools like the state shift audit and the three-second pause to cultivate that vital gap, the observer mindset, between the market’s data and your biological response. It is entirely about moving from being a reactor to being an observer. It means treating your psychology as a serious, manageable decision process rather than some mystical test of your willpower.

So as we wrap up, I want to leave you with a final grounded question to mull over before you sit down for your next trading session. Think about that private trading journal you keep on your desk, the one only you see. If that journal was published tomorrow, completely unedited, for a board of institutional risk managers to read, would it look like the objective log of a business operating under probability? Or would it look like the diary of someone desperately seeking emotional validation from a random number generator? That is the ultimate standard.

Until your language reflects the serious business of probability, the market will remain a very expensive mirror for your emotions. See you next time.

Get full access to The Observer at theobservermindset.substack.com/subscribe