Strategic Justice in Action

By strategicjustice

*Strategic Justice in Action* explores the intersection of trial strategies and appellate advocacy, offering insights into navigating the legal landscape effectively. Join Attorney David Senoff as

... more

· Business

Download on the App Store

Download on the App Store

Get it on Google Play

FAQs about Strategic Justice in Action:

How many episodes does Strategic Justice in Action have?

The podcast currently has 20 episodes available.

Strategic Justice in Action episodes:

September 15, 2026 Appealing Evidentiary Rulings: When Trial Court Decisions Change the Outcome
Episode Summary:
In this episode of Strategic Justice in Action with David Senoff, host Evan Mack is joined by David Senoff, a plaintiffs attorney and founding partner of First Law Strategy Group, to explore the complexities of appealing evidentiary rulings in trial courts. They discuss what makes an evidentiary ruling worth appealing and the importance of timely objections during trials. David explains the harmless error doctrine and how appellate courts evaluate whether an evidentiary error affected the case outcome.
They also delve into the significance of preserving issues for appeal and the challenges trial lawyers face when assuming certain rulings are appealable. This episode is essential for legal professionals seeking to understand the nuances of appellate advocacy and evidentiary rulings, providing valuable insights into the appellate process and strategies for successful appeals.
Key Timestamps:
00:01 – Introduction
0:22 – Understanding Evidentiary Appeals
1:14 – Common Objections in Trials
2:18 – Outcome Determinative Evidence
3:14 – Harmless Error Doctrine Explained
4:47 – The Role of Experts in Trials
6:32 – Importance of Timely Objections
7:35 – Preserving Issues for Appeal
9:30 – Establishing Harmless vs. Reversible Error
10:49 – Case Example: Wrongful Death Damages
12:22 – Jury Questions and Evidentiary Errors
13:49 – Misconceptions About Appealability
About the Show:
Strategic Justice in Action with David Senoff is a podcast dedicated to unraveling the intricacies of the legal system, focusing on appellate advocacy, insurance, bad faith, and public policy litigation. Hosted by Evan Mack, the show features insightful discussions with legal experts like David Senoff, providing listeners with practical knowledge and strategies to navigate complex legal challenges. Whether you're a seasoned attorney or a law student, Strategic Justice in Action with David Senoff offers valuable perspectives on holding corporations and governments accountable through effective legal strategies.
Visit the website below to learn more:
https://firstlawstrategy.com/
...more
17min
September 01, 2026 Appealing Summary Judgment Decisions: What Makes a Strong Appeal?
Episode Summary:
In this episode of Strategic Justice in Action with David Senoff, host Evan Mack sits down with David Senoff, a founding partner at First Law Strategy Group, to delve into the intricacies of appealing summary judgment decisions. David, an experienced plaintiff attorney, shares his insights on the circumstances under which summary judgments can be appealed, the factors that influence the success of these appeals, and the role of evidence in determining the outcome.
He explains the importance of understanding the standard of review and how legal errors can lead to the reversal of a summary judgment decision. David also discusses the strategic considerations for trial lawyers when deciding to involve appellate counsel. This episode is essential for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of appellate advocacy and improve their litigation strategy.
Key Timestamps:
00:01 – Introduction
00:22 – Overview of Summary Judgment Appeals
00:39 – When Summary Judgments Can Be Appealed
01:47 – Challenges of Interlocutory Appeals
02:21 – Evaluating Summary Judgment Rulings
03:06 – Importance of Evidence in Appeals
04:14 – Legal vs. Factual Grounds for Appeal
05:26 – Standard of Review in Appeals
06:19 – No Evidence Motions for Summary Judgment
07:14 – Common Legal Errors in Summary Judgments
09:32 – Trial Judges' Role in Summary Judgments
10:49 – Appellate Court Affirmation on Different Grounds
11:32 – Example of Successful Summary Judgment Appeal
15:08 – Timing for Involving Appellate Counsel
16:36 – Strategic Considerations for Trial Lawyers
About the Show:
Strategic Justice in Action with David Senoff is a podcast dedicated to exploring the nuances of legal strategy and advocacy. Hosted by Evan Mack, the show features insightful discussions with leading attorneys and experts who share their experiences and knowledge on various aspects of the legal system.
Whether you're a seasoned lawyer or just starting your legal career, this podcast offers valuable insights into the strategic decisions that can impact the outcome of a case. With a focus on clarity and practical advice, Strategic Justice in Action with David Senoff aims to empower listeners to navigate the complexities of the legal world effectively.
Visit the website below to learn more:
https://firstlawstrategy.com/
...more
19min
August 04, 2026 Appealing Large Jury Verdicts: Damages, Remittitur, and Excessiveness Review
Episode Summary:
In this episode of Strategic Justice in Action, host David Senoff, a plaintiff attorney with expertise in appellate advocacy and insurance bad faith, joins Evan Mack to explore the complexities of appealing large jury verdicts. They delve into the nuances of damages, remittitur, and excessiveness review, particularly focusing on how these elements shape the appellate process.
David discusses the challenges both defendants and plaintiffs face when dealing with substantial verdicts, especially in Pennsylvania, and the critical role of evidence and jury instructions in potential appeals. The conversation also covers the constitutional analysis of punitive damages and the influence of comparable cases on verdict assessments. Listeners will gain valuable insights into building a robust damages record for trial and appellate scrutiny, as well as strategic considerations for settlement negotiations post-verdict.
Key Timestamps:
00:01 – Introduction
0:21 – Overview of Large Jury Verdicts
0:54 – Appellate Risks for Defendants
1:41 – Strategies for Overturning Verdicts
2:56 – Plaintiff's Perspective on Holding Verdicts
5:15 – Understanding Remittitur
7:25 – Role of Punitive Damages
9:29 – Constitutional Analysis of Punitive Damages
10:42 – Importance of Comparable Cases
12:03 – Standards of Review in Appeals
14:10 – Building a Damages Record
15:42 – Case Example: Appellate Review Impact
18:42 – Appellate Strategy and Settlement Posture
About the Show:
Strategic Justice in Action is a podcast dedicated to unraveling the complexities of the legal system, focusing on appellate advocacy, insurance litigation, and public policy. Hosted by David Senoff, a seasoned plaintiff attorney, the show provides in-depth discussions on holding corporations and governments accountable through strategic legal action. Listeners can expect expert insights, practical advice, and engaging conversations aimed at empowering legal professionals and individuals seeking justice. Whether you're navigating the intricacies of a legal case or interested in the broader implications of public policy, Strategic Justice in Action offers valuable perspectives and actionable strategies.
...more
21min
July 21, 2026 Supreme Court Strategy: When (and When Not) to Seek High Court Review
Episode Summary:
In this episode of Strategic Justice in Action, David Senoff, a founding partner of First Law Strategy Group, delves into the intricacies of Supreme Court strategy with Evan Mack. They explore the critical decision-making process lawyers face when considering whether to seek high court review. David explains the structural differences between state and federal Supreme Court reviews and intermediate appellate courts, emphasizing the importance of discretionary review and the factors that make a case a viable candidate for Supreme Court consideration. The discussion covers the significance of splits among lower courts, the role of amicus participation, and the broader policy implications that can influence the likelihood of review. Listeners gain insights into how Supreme Court strategy should fit into the broader lifecycle of a case, particularly in complex or high-stakes litigation.
Key Timestamps:
00:01 – Introduction
00:33 – Supreme Court Review vs. Intermediate Appellate Court
01:55 – Criteria for Discretionary Review
03:21 – Importance of Lower Court Splits
05:02 – Factors Influencing High Court Review
06:05 – Strategic Considerations for Filing Appeals
07:02 – Framing Issues for Supreme Court Review
08:34 – Strategic Wisdom in Seeking Supreme Court Review
10:06 – Role of Statutory Interpretation
11:20 – Impact of Amicus Participation
13:05 – Case Example: Venue Decisions and Long-term Consequences
14:48 – Supreme Court Strategy in Litigation Lifecycle
About the Show:
Strategic Justice in Action is a podcast for legal professionals and those interested in the strategic aspects of law. Hosted by David Senoff, the show offers insights into appellate advocacy, insurance, bad faith, and public policy litigation. Each episode breaks down complex legal topics with clarity and precision, providing listeners with actionable strategies and a deeper understanding of the legal landscape. Whether you're a seasoned attorney or someone interested in the intricacies of the justice system, Strategic Justice in Action delivers valuable content that informs and empowers.
...more
17min
June 23, 2026 Insurance Bad Faith Appeals: What Changes After a Trial Verdict
Episode Summary:
In this episode of Strategic Justice in Action, host Evan Mack sits down with David Senoff, a seasoned plaintiff's attorney and founder of the First Law Strategy Group, to delve into the intricacies of insurance bad faith appeals. David discusses the transition from trial verdicts to the appellate phase, highlighting the unique challenges and strategies involved. He explains how the focus shifts from emotional storytelling at trial to legal arguments on appeal, where the appellate court reviews errors of law rather than facts. The conversation covers common issues raised by insurers, such as excessive punitive damages and the difficulty of overturning trial verdicts. David also provides insight into how appellate courts evaluate evidence of insurer intent and the role of post-trial motions. This episode is essential for attorneys handling bad faith litigation, offering valuable strategies for factoring appellate risk into case strategy.
Key Timestamps:
00:01 – Introduction
00:22 – Overview of Insurance Bad Faith Appeals
01:41 – Emotional Storytelling in Trial vs. Legal Focus on Appeal
03:21 – Role of Jury Instructions in Appeals
05:00 – Errors of Law and Their Impact on Verdicts
06:21 – Common Insurer Appeals on Bad Faith Verdicts
09:48 – Standard of Review and Its Influence on Appeals
12:04 – Evaluating Punitive Damages on Appeal
14:05 – Importance of Post-Trial Motions
15:52 – Assessing Insurer Intent in Bad Faith Cases
18:08 – Factoring Appellate Risk into Case Strategy
20:43 – The Importance of Settling Bad Faith Cases
About the Show:
Strategic Justice in Action is a podcast dedicated to exploring the complexities of legal strategy and advocacy. Hosted by Evan Mack, the show features in-depth discussions with experienced attorneys like David Senoff, focusing on topics such as appellate advocacy, insurance bad faith, and public policy litigation. Designed for legal professionals and those interested in the justice system, the podcast offers insights into holding corporations and governments accountable. With a commitment to clarity and ethics, Strategic Justice in Action aims to equip listeners with the knowledge to navigate the legal landscape effectively.
...more
22min
June 10, 2026 Interlocutory Appeals: When You Don’t Have to Wait for Final Judgment
Episode Summary:
In this episode of Strategic Justice in Action, host Evan Mack sits down with David Senoff, a plaintiffs attorney and founding partner of First Law Strategy Group, to delve into the complexities of interlocutory appeals. David explains the nuances of these appeals, which occur before a final judgment, and discusses their categories, including discovery orders, venue challenges, and injunctions. The conversation highlights the legal system's preference for resolving all issues in one comprehensive appeal post-trial, while also exploring exceptions that allow for interlocutory review. David shares insights on the strategic considerations and risks involved in pursuing these appeals, emphasizing the importance of evaluating the necessity and potential impact on the case. Listeners gain a deeper understanding of how interlocutory appeals can influence litigation strategy and the importance of judiciously deciding when to pursue them.
Key Timestamps:
00:01 – Introduction
00:07 – What is an Interlocutory Appeal?
01:32 – Categories of Interlocutory Appeals
03:13 – Why the Legal System Prefers Comprehensive Appeals
04:37 – Exceptions Allowing Interlocutory Review
06:09 – Collateral Order Doctrine Explained
07:42 – Common Rulings for Interlocutory Review
09:04 – Evaluating the Worth of Seeking Interlocutory Review
10:43 – Risks of Pursuing Interlocutory Appeals
12:37 – Procedural and Strategic Risks
15:30 – Case Examples of Successful Interlocutory Appeals
17:53 – Strategic Planning and Interlocutory Appeals
19:18 – Conclusion
About the Show:
Strategic Justice in Action is a podcast dedicated to exploring the intricacies of the legal system, with a focus on appellate advocacy, insurance, and public policy litigation. Hosted by seasoned attorneys, the show provides listeners with in-depth discussions on legal strategies, case studies, and the implications of various legal processes. Designed for legal professionals and anyone interested in the justice system, the podcast aims to demystify complex legal topics and offer practical insights for navigating the legal landscape.
...more
20min
May 26, 2026 Post-Trial Motions That Make or Break an Appeal
Episode Summary:
In this episode of Strategic Justice in Action, host Evan Mack is joined by David Senoff, a plaintiffs attorney and founding partner of First Law Strategy Group. They delve into the intricacies of post-trial motions and their critical role in the appellate process. David explains the importance of keeping meticulous records during trials, from noting unfavorable rulings to objecting to jury composition. He highlights the necessity of preserving issues for appeal through timely objections and comprehensive post-trial motions. The discussion also covers the waiver trap in appellate rules and the significance of including all pertinent objections in post-trial motions to avoid waiver on appeal. David provides insights into the strategic considerations law firms must evaluate when deciding to pursue an appeal, emphasizing the importance of a strong post-trial record. This episode is essential for attorneys seeking to enhance their appellate advocacy skills and ensure effective post-trial strategies.
Key Timestamps:
00:01 – Introduction
00:23 – Importance of Post-Trial Motions
00:46 – Key Post-Trial Motions to Consider
01:28 – Handling Expert Testimony Exclusions
02:31 – Jury Composition and Challenges
04:19 – Jury Instructions and Objections
06:06 – Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict
06:47 – Preservation of Issues for Appeal
09:49 – Pennsylvania's Statement of Matters on Appeal
11:01 – Risks of Incomplete Post-Trial Records
12:47 – New Appellate Rules in Pennsylvania
14:49 – Importance of Respectful Objections
16:47 – Strategic Decision-Making for Appeals
About the Show:
Strategic Justice in Action is a podcast dedicated to exploring the complexities of the legal system, with a focus on appellate advocacy, insurance bad faith, and public policy litigation. Hosted by Evan Mack, the show features in-depth discussions with legal experts like David Senoff, providing listeners with valuable insights into the strategies and challenges of holding corporations and governments accountable. Whether you're a seasoned attorney or new to the field, this podcast offers practical advice and thought-provoking conversations to enhance your understanding of the legal landscape.
...more
19min
May 12, 2026 Standards of Review Explained: Why Most Appeals Fail Before They Begin
Episode Summary:
In this episode of Strategic Justice in Action, host Evan Mack sits down with David Senoff, a founding partner at First Law Strategy Group, to delve into the intricacies of standards of review in appellate advocacy. David explains how these standards play a pivotal role in determining the outcome of appeals, often overshadowing the substantive merits of a case. They discuss the limitations appellate courts face, focusing only on the trial record and not reevaluating evidence or witness credibility. David emphasizes the importance of trial teams meticulously building the record to ensure all relevant documents are included, as omissions can doom an appeal. He shares insights on how trial lawyers can strategically think about the standard of review from the outset of a case, and recounts real-world examples where these standards became decisive. Listeners will gain a deeper understanding of how to navigate the appellate landscape effectively, ensuring their cases are positioned for the best possible outcome.
Key Timestamps:
00:01 – Introduction
00:22 – Importance of Standards of Review
01:16 – Scope of Appellate Review
02:09 – Common Errors in Trial Courts
03:06 – Framing Issues on Appeal
04:43 – Why Appeals Rise or Fall
06:00 – Missteps by Trial Teams
07:20 – Factual Findings vs. Legal Conclusions
09:01 – Documenting Evidence for Appeals
10:48 – Role of Credibility Determinations
11:35 – Early Consideration of Standards
13:15 – Case Examples Influenced by Standards
15:55 – Strategic Decisions in Appeals
About the Show:
Strategic Justice in Action is a podcast designed for legal professionals and enthusiasts eager to explore the nuances of appellate advocacy and litigation strategy. Hosted by Evan Mack, the series features in-depth discussions with leading attorneys like David Senoff, offering insights into complex legal concepts with clarity and precision. The show aims to empower listeners with knowledge on how to effectively navigate the legal system, focusing on ethics, accountability, and strategic thinking. Whether you're a seasoned attorney or new to the field, Strategic Justice in Action provides valuable perspectives to enhance your legal practice.
...more
21min
March 31, 2026 Pro Se Appeals: What Trial Lawyers and Courts Should Expect
Episode Summary:
In this episode of *Strategic Justice in Action*, Attorney David Senoff discusses Pro Se Appeals, where litigants represent themselves on appeal. He highlights the challenges faced by self-represented individuals in navigating the appellate process and the common mistakes they make that can impact the success of their appeals.
Key Timestamps:
00:00 – Introduction
01:30 – Overview of Pro Se Appeals
03:15 – Challenges in Finding Representation for Appeals
05:45 – Impact of Trial Court Mistakes on Appeals
08:10 – Issues with Pro Se Briefs
10:20 – Adjusting Legal Strategy Against Pro Se Appellants
12:40 – Unexpected Challenges in Pro Se Appeals
15:05 – Importance of Understanding Appellate Rules
About the Show:
*Strategic Justice in Action* is a podcast that delves into legal topics, offering valuable insights and expertise from Attorney David Senoff at First Law Strategy Group.
...more
14min
March 17, 2026 Can the FCC Regulate Podcasts, Late-Night TV, and Political Speech? What the Law Actually Says
Episode Summary:
In this episode of *Strategic Justice in Action*, Attorney David Senoff delves into the intricate world of FCC regulations and its impact on the media. From the historical context of the FCC's inception to its evolving role in today's media landscape, David sheds light on the complexities of broadcast licensing and free speech. Join the conversation as he dissects recent cases involving late-night talk show hosts and network mergers, offering valuable insights into the legal ramifications of these scenarios.
Key Timestamps:
00:00 – Introduction
02:12 – Explaining the FCC and its role in media consumption
06:45 – Evolution of media platforms and FCC regulations
10:30 – Case study: Jimmy Kimmel's FCC controversy
14:50 – Legal remedies for individuals and networks in FCC disputes
18:25 – Stephen Colbert and the equal time rule
22:10 – FCC's involvement in media mergers and acquisitions
26:45 – Importance of understanding free speech and legal nuances
30:00 – Wrapping up the discussion with key takeaways
About the Show:
*Strategic Justice in Action* explores the intersection of law, media, and public policy through engaging discussions with Attorney David Senoff and industry experts. Join us as we navigate the complex legal landscape to empower individuals with knowledge and insights on critical issues shaping our society.
...more
21min

FAQs about Strategic Justice in Action:

How many episodes does Strategic Justice in Action have?

The podcast currently has 20 episodes available.