
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
As part of his investigation into Donald Trump's 2020 election subversion crimes, Jack Smith obtained a search warrant for Trump's Twitter/X account information. Smith also obtained a typical nondisclosure order directing that Twitter/X can not disclose to Trump the fact that the feds had seized his account information. This nondisclosure order - which prohibited disclosure to Trump of a period of six months after the execution of the search warrant - is entirely typical to protect ongoing investigations. But Musk challenged the nondisclosure order, claiming that it violated X's First Amendment free speech rights. Well, the US Supreme Court just rebuffed Musk, as reported by CBS news, "Supreme Court won't step into dispute over Jack Smith's efforts to get Trump's X information."
Glenn discusses why the Supreme Court was right to reject Musk's petition for review.
If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at:
/ glennkirschner
If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:
https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...
Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/
Follow Glenn on:
Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
4.9
27082,708 ratings
As part of his investigation into Donald Trump's 2020 election subversion crimes, Jack Smith obtained a search warrant for Trump's Twitter/X account information. Smith also obtained a typical nondisclosure order directing that Twitter/X can not disclose to Trump the fact that the feds had seized his account information. This nondisclosure order - which prohibited disclosure to Trump of a period of six months after the execution of the search warrant - is entirely typical to protect ongoing investigations. But Musk challenged the nondisclosure order, claiming that it violated X's First Amendment free speech rights. Well, the US Supreme Court just rebuffed Musk, as reported by CBS news, "Supreme Court won't step into dispute over Jack Smith's efforts to get Trump's X information."
Glenn discusses why the Supreme Court was right to reject Musk's petition for review.
If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at:
/ glennkirschner
If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:
https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...
Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/
Follow Glenn on:
Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
7,339 Listeners
7,566 Listeners
4,478 Listeners
3,585 Listeners
4,624 Listeners
7,355 Listeners
1,849 Listeners
10,410 Listeners
9,043 Listeners
5,587 Listeners
2,385 Listeners
7,130 Listeners
1,926 Listeners
349 Listeners
344 Listeners