Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Taylor Swift's Kamala Harris Endorsement: A Mixed Bag for the 2024 Campaign
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Taylor Swift's Kamala Harris Endorsement: A Mixed Bag for the 2024 Campaign
Despite her immense popularity and influence, Taylor Swift's recent endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris for the 2024 presidential election has yielded unexpected and mixed results, according to several recent polls and reports.
On the evening of the presidential debate between Harris and former President Donald Trump, Swift took to Instagram to announce her support for Harris, praising her as a "warrior to champion" the rights and causes Swift believes in. This endorsement, directed at her vast audience of 284 million followers, prompted a significant surge in voter registration interest, with the vote.gov website receiving over 405,000 visitors in the 24 hours following her post.
However, the impact on voter intentions has been less favorable for the Harris campaign. A YouGov poll conducted on September 11 and 12 revealed that only 8% of voters said Swift's endorsement would make them "somewhat" or "much more likely" to vote for Harris, while a notable 20% indicated they would be less likely to support her.
This backlash is further underscored by another poll, which found that 66% of respondents stated that a celebrity endorsement would not influence their voting decisions. Additionally, 13% of those surveyed expressed that Swift's endorsement made them less likely to vote for Harris, particularly among Trump supporters.
Contrary to concerns that Swift's endorsement might harm her own popularity, her music sales and chart performance have remained robust. Despite Trump's prediction that Swift would "suffer consequences in the marketplace" for her endorsement, her latest album, "The Tortured Poets Department," has maintained its position on the Billboard 200 chart, and other albums have seen minimal changes in their rankings.
The Harris campaign, while appreciative of Swift's support, is cautious about leveraging it further. Aides to Harris have expressed a desire for Swift to engage in active campaigning, such as attending a rally in Pennsylvania, a key battleground state. However, given the polling results, such actions may not yield the desired benefits.
The mixed impact of Swift's endorsement highlights the complex and often unpredictable nature of celebrity influence in politics. While some endorsements, like Oprah Winfrey's support for Barack Obama in 2008, have significantly boosted a candidate's chances, others have had minimal or even negative effects.
In conclusion, Taylor Swift's endorsement of Kamala Harris has driven voter registration but has not significantly swayed voter intentions in favor of Harris. As the election approaches, it remains to be seen whether celebrity endorsements will play a pivotal role in shaping the outcome.
On the evening of the presidential debate between Harris and former President Donald Trump, Swift took to Instagram to announce her support for Harris, praising her as a "warrior to champion" the rights and causes Swift believes in. This endorsement, directed at her vast audience of 284 million followers, prompted a significant surge in voter registration interest, with the vote.gov website receiving over 405,000 visitors in the 24 hours following her post.
However, the impact on voter intentions has been less favorable for the Harris campaign. A YouGov poll conducted on September 11 and 12 revealed that only 8% of voters said Swift's endorsement would make them "somewhat" or "much more likely" to vote for Harris, while a notable 20% indicated they would be less likely to support her.
This backlash is further underscored by another poll, which found that 66% of respondents stated that a celebrity endorsement would not influence their voting decisions. Additionally, 13% of those surveyed expressed that Swift's endorsement made them less likely to vote for Harris, particularly among Trump supporters.
Contrary to concerns that Swift's endorsement might harm her own popularity, her music sales and chart performance have remained robust. Despite Trump's prediction that Swift would "suffer consequences in the marketplace" for her endorsement, her latest album, "The Tortured Poets Department," has maintained its position on the Billboard 200 chart, and other albums have seen minimal changes in their rankings.
The Harris campaign, while appreciative of Swift's support, is cautious about leveraging it further. Aides to Harris have expressed a desire for Swift to engage in active campaigning, such as attending a rally in Pennsylvania, a key battleground state. However, given the polling results, such actions may not yield the desired benefits.
The mixed impact of Swift's endorsement highlights the complex and often unpredictable nature of celebrity influence in politics. While some endorsements, like Oprah Winfrey's support for Barack Obama in 2008, have significantly boosted a candidate's chances, others have had minimal or even negative effects.
In conclusion, Taylor Swift's endorsement of Kamala Harris has driven voter registration but has not significantly swayed voter intentions in favor of Harris. As the election approaches, it remains to be seen whether celebrity endorsements will play a pivotal role in shaping the outcome.
View all episodes
By Quiet. PleaseDespite her immense popularity and influence, Taylor Swift's recent endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris for the 2024 presidential election has yielded unexpected and mixed results, according to several recent polls and reports.
On the evening of the presidential debate between Harris and former President Donald Trump, Swift took to Instagram to announce her support for Harris, praising her as a "warrior to champion" the rights and causes Swift believes in. This endorsement, directed at her vast audience of 284 million followers, prompted a significant surge in voter registration interest, with the vote.gov website receiving over 405,000 visitors in the 24 hours following her post.
However, the impact on voter intentions has been less favorable for the Harris campaign. A YouGov poll conducted on September 11 and 12 revealed that only 8% of voters said Swift's endorsement would make them "somewhat" or "much more likely" to vote for Harris, while a notable 20% indicated they would be less likely to support her.
This backlash is further underscored by another poll, which found that 66% of respondents stated that a celebrity endorsement would not influence their voting decisions. Additionally, 13% of those surveyed expressed that Swift's endorsement made them less likely to vote for Harris, particularly among Trump supporters.
Contrary to concerns that Swift's endorsement might harm her own popularity, her music sales and chart performance have remained robust. Despite Trump's prediction that Swift would "suffer consequences in the marketplace" for her endorsement, her latest album, "The Tortured Poets Department," has maintained its position on the Billboard 200 chart, and other albums have seen minimal changes in their rankings.
The Harris campaign, while appreciative of Swift's support, is cautious about leveraging it further. Aides to Harris have expressed a desire for Swift to engage in active campaigning, such as attending a rally in Pennsylvania, a key battleground state. However, given the polling results, such actions may not yield the desired benefits.
The mixed impact of Swift's endorsement highlights the complex and often unpredictable nature of celebrity influence in politics. While some endorsements, like Oprah Winfrey's support for Barack Obama in 2008, have significantly boosted a candidate's chances, others have had minimal or even negative effects.
In conclusion, Taylor Swift's endorsement of Kamala Harris has driven voter registration but has not significantly swayed voter intentions in favor of Harris. As the election approaches, it remains to be seen whether celebrity endorsements will play a pivotal role in shaping the outcome.
On the evening of the presidential debate between Harris and former President Donald Trump, Swift took to Instagram to announce her support for Harris, praising her as a "warrior to champion" the rights and causes Swift believes in. This endorsement, directed at her vast audience of 284 million followers, prompted a significant surge in voter registration interest, with the vote.gov website receiving over 405,000 visitors in the 24 hours following her post.
However, the impact on voter intentions has been less favorable for the Harris campaign. A YouGov poll conducted on September 11 and 12 revealed that only 8% of voters said Swift's endorsement would make them "somewhat" or "much more likely" to vote for Harris, while a notable 20% indicated they would be less likely to support her.
This backlash is further underscored by another poll, which found that 66% of respondents stated that a celebrity endorsement would not influence their voting decisions. Additionally, 13% of those surveyed expressed that Swift's endorsement made them less likely to vote for Harris, particularly among Trump supporters.
Contrary to concerns that Swift's endorsement might harm her own popularity, her music sales and chart performance have remained robust. Despite Trump's prediction that Swift would "suffer consequences in the marketplace" for her endorsement, her latest album, "The Tortured Poets Department," has maintained its position on the Billboard 200 chart, and other albums have seen minimal changes in their rankings.
The Harris campaign, while appreciative of Swift's support, is cautious about leveraging it further. Aides to Harris have expressed a desire for Swift to engage in active campaigning, such as attending a rally in Pennsylvania, a key battleground state. However, given the polling results, such actions may not yield the desired benefits.
The mixed impact of Swift's endorsement highlights the complex and often unpredictable nature of celebrity influence in politics. While some endorsements, like Oprah Winfrey's support for Barack Obama in 2008, have significantly boosted a candidate's chances, others have had minimal or even negative effects.
In conclusion, Taylor Swift's endorsement of Kamala Harris has driven voter registration but has not significantly swayed voter intentions in favor of Harris. As the election approaches, it remains to be seen whether celebrity endorsements will play a pivotal role in shaping the outcome.