Today we’re diving into a critical conversation around digital literacy, ethics, and our responsibilities as educators using technology in the classroom ..........

Today we’re diving into a critical conversation around digital literacy, ethics, and our responsibilities as educators using technology in the classroom ..........

Teaching in the Digital Age - Ethics and Responsibilities

Welcome to Teaching in the Digital Age. I’m Tendai, and today we’re diving into a critical conversation around digital literacy, ethics, and our responsibilities as educators using technology in the classroom.As I reflect on Renée Hobbs’ work in Create to Learn—especially Chapter 8, which explores digital and audio podcasting—I’m struck by how central digital literacy has become not just as a skill, but as a mindset. Hobbs (2017) describes digital literacy as the ability to access, analyze, create, reflect, and act using digital tools. But what happens when our classrooms are flooded with tech, and we haven’t critically considered the ethics behind their use?Let’s start with student privacy. With platforms collecting data, from learning analytics to behaviour tracking, how often do we ask: What are we doing to protect our students’ information? As Hobbs highlights, media production tools like podcasts give learners a voice—but that voice must be safeguarded. This means using consent forms, anonymizing data, and choosing platforms that align with data protection laws like GDPR.Closely linked is child safeguarding. In any digital space, the risk of exposure to inappropriate content or online predators exists. As educators, we must balance encouraging digital exploration with setting boundaries and teaching digital resilience. That involves robust filtering systems, but also conversations with learners about online safety, peer behaviour, and self-regulation.Then there’s digital citizenship. Hobbs (2017) argues that digital literacy education should cultivate critical thinking, empathy, and responsibility. This aligns with my growing belief that we are not just teaching students how to use tech, but how to live and learn ethically within it. We must model respectful online interactions and challenge disinformation, bias, and cyberbullying when we see it.Finally, equitable access remains a persistent issue. Digital learning environments are only empowering if they are inclusive. That means recognising that some learners have limited access to Wi-Fi, devices, or quiet spaces to learn. As Hobbs writes, podcasting and other creative tools can democratize learning—but only if we address these structural inequalities. For me, this means pushing for device loan schemes, offline alternatives, and differentiated instruction.So how has this learning shifted my own sense of digital literacy? It’s made me more aware of the power dynamics embedded in tech use. It’s no longer enough to be digitally competent—I must be digitally critical. As an educator, this means being intentional about the tools I use, the digital culture I cultivate, and the voices I centre.For learners, the implication is equally profound. They need support not just in consuming digital content, but in creating it with care. In fact, as Hobbs encourages, integrating podcasting into classrooms can be an empowering way to teach ethical expression, digital storytelling, and reflective practice.In summary, teaching in the digital age requires more than knowing how to use tech. It’s about ethical leadership, safeguarding, inclusivity, and fostering responsible digital citizens. As Hobbs (2017) reminds us, when we help students create, we also help them learn who they are and how they relate to the world—and that is the true power of digital literacy.Thanks for listening. Until next time, keep learning—and keep questioning.

Technology

Welcome to Teaching in the Digital Age. I’m Tendai, and today we’re diving into a critical conversation around digital literacy, ethics, and our responsibilities as educators using technology in the classroom. As I reflect on Renée Hobbs’ work in Create to Learn—especially Chapter 8, which explores digital and audio podcasting—I’m struck by how central digital literacy has become not just as a skill, but as a mindset. Hobbs (2017) describes digital literacy as the ability to access, analyze, create, reflect, and act using digital tools. But what happens when our classrooms are flooded with tech, and we haven’t critically considered the ethics behind their use? Let’s start with student privacy. With platforms collecting data, from learning analytics to behaviour tracking, how often do we ask: What are we doing to protect our students’ information? As Hobbs highlights, media production tools like podcasts give learners a voice—but that voice must be safeguarded. This means using consent forms, anonymizing data, and choosing platforms that align with data protection laws like GDPR. Closely linked is child safeguarding. In any digital space, the risk of exposure to inappropriate content or online predators exists. As educators, we must balance encouraging digital exploration with setting boundaries and teaching digital resilience. That involves robust filtering systems, but also conversations with learners about online safety, peer behaviour, and self-regulation. Then there’s digital citizenship. Hobbs (2017) argues that digital literacy education should cultivate critical thinking, empathy, and responsibility. This aligns with my growing belief that we are not just teaching students how to use tech, but how to live and learn ethically within it. We must model respectful online interactions and challenge disinformation, bias, and cyberbullying when we see it. Finally, equitable access remains a persistent issue. Digital learning environments are only empowering if they are inclusive. That means recognising that some learners have limited access to Wi-Fi, devices, or quiet spaces to learn. As Hobbs writes, podcasting and other creative tools can democratize learning—but only if we address these structural inequalities. For me, this means pushing for device loan schemes, offline alternatives, and differentiated instruction. So how has this learning shifted my own sense of digital literacy? It’s made me more aware of the power dynamics embedded in tech use. It’s no longer enough to be digitally competent—I must be digitally critical. As an educator, this means being intentional about the tools I use, the digital culture I cultivate, and the voices I centre. For learners, the implication is equally profound. They need support not just in consuming digital content, but in creating it with care. In fact, as Hobbs encourages, integrating podcasting into classrooms can be an empowering way to teach ethical expression, digital storytelling, and reflective practice. In summary, teaching in the digital age requires more than knowing how to use tech. It’s about ethical leadership, safeguarding, inclusivity, and fostering responsible digital citizens. As Hobbs (2017) reminds us, when we help students create, we also help them learn who they are and how they relate to the world—and that is the true power of digital literacy. Thanks for listening. Until next time, keep learning—and keep questioning.

Share Teaching in the Digital Age - Ethics and Responsibilities

Sign up to save your podcasts

Teaching in the Digital Age - Ethics and Responsibilities

Teaching in the Digital Age - Ethics and Responsibilities