Did we forget anything?  

Is Star Trek Discover trying to provoke us?

We take your messages and see how we feel about this episode after sitting with it a few days.

Tom remarks on how big the bridge is.  

Stefan is a little confused about Burnham's parents. Actually we are too.  Is this show "um, actually"-ing and daring us to get upset over canon? Why not ... you know, just not go there?  

Lane defends the show against the critiques we made earlier. Wade agrees but Hugh and James defend their hatred for the episode.  What happens when Jason Isaacs gives you whiskey?

Eric has his own Lorca theory/prediction. What about the Cornwell/Lethe/Dagger of the Mind theory? Why is the show obsessed with rehashing TOS instead of working with what we know from the TNG era?

Carly agrees with James on how much she's disliking the show, but hey, it's Star Trek so we're still watching it.  What about the rest of those paying for the app? 

Kristin is trying to hold out hope for the show, and brings up a "rule of three" that CSI relies on to... not the greatest effect.

Is "Transformer directing" ruining this?  Who should be brought on as showrunner for season 2?  James has an inspired choice!

Let us know what you think about the show and join us for the next episode "Magic to Make the Sanest Man go Mad"

917 408 3898

and check out our patreon! (patreon.com/kickersofelves)