In this thought-provoking episode, we take a deep dive into the state of justice in America, moving beyond the polarizing indictments of former President Donald J. Trump to confront a much larger issue: the alarming prevalence of injustice within the nation's legal system. We invite you to join us in an exploration of the critical questions surrounding life, liberty, property, happiness, and justice for all.
Our discussion begins with a startling revelation: various American organizations, including innocence projects, inmate advocacy groups, and national news media, have reported that approximately two million people are incarcerated in America's prisons. Even more distressing is the estimate that between 2% (40,000 people) and 10% (200,000 people) of these incarcerated individuals may have been wrongfully convicted and are, in fact, innocent. This raises a fundamental question about the integrity of America's constitutional republic and its democratic ideals. Has the pursuit of justice been overshadowed by a system that some argue has evolved into what could be described as a "Beria gambit," where individuals are targeted and crimes are constructed to fit a preconceived narrative?
Consider this: Federal district judge Jed S. Rakoff noted in 2015 that an estimated 20,000 individuals each year end up in prison for crimes they did not commit but pleaded guilty to in fear of facing harsher sentences if they went to trial. The prevalence of plea bargains has coerced many innocent people into accepting deals that compromise their innocence. According to the Chicago Tribune, in 2018, approximately 1.5 million people were in prison in the United States, with wrongful convictions estimated between 2% (30,000 people) and 10% (150,000 people) of those who "pleaded guilty but did not in fact commit the crime."
How many ordinary Americans have witnessed the harrowing possibility of a loved one, a friend, or a neighbor facing such a dilemma? The fear of lengthy sentences often pushes innocent individuals to accept negotiated plea bargains, pleading guilty to crimes they did not commit, in an attempt to minimize the collateral damage inflicted on themselves and their families, friends, and neighbors upon release. But what safeguards exist to ensure the safety and security of those wrongfully incarcerated while serving their sentences?
As we unravel these distressing realities, we reflect on the wisdom of Federalist James Madison, who, in Federalist Paper No. 51 (1788), emphasized the importance of enabling government to control the governed while obliging it to control itself. Madison spoke of "auxiliary precautions" as a means to ensure that government does not overstep its bounds and infringe upon the rights and well-being of its citizens.
In our exploration, we will consider whether these "auxiliary precautions" have been upheld or eroded over time, as we examine the role of self-serving ambiguous laws, bureaucratic regulations, and policies that can have a profound impact on the lives of ordinary Americans. Join us as we navigate the intricate web of justice, government power, and the pursuit of fairness and equity for all citizens.
---
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/the-afflicted-movement/message
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/the-afflicted-movement/support