
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode of Film Jury, we put The Autopsy of Jane Doe on trial.
What starts as a routine examination of an unidentified body quickly becomes something far more disturbing as layers of mystery, science, and the unexplained begin to collide inside the morgue. But the real question isn't just what happened to Jane Doe… it's whether the film itself holds up under scrutiny.
We break down the storytelling, tension, pacing, and horror mechanics that drive the film, and challenge whether its reputation matches its execution. Is it truly a standout modern horror entry, or does it lean too heavily on atmosphere over substance?
After deliberation, the jury returns with a unanimous decision:
3 Not Guilty verdicts.
But not for the reasons you might expect.
By James PatrickIn this episode of Film Jury, we put The Autopsy of Jane Doe on trial.
What starts as a routine examination of an unidentified body quickly becomes something far more disturbing as layers of mystery, science, and the unexplained begin to collide inside the morgue. But the real question isn't just what happened to Jane Doe… it's whether the film itself holds up under scrutiny.
We break down the storytelling, tension, pacing, and horror mechanics that drive the film, and challenge whether its reputation matches its execution. Is it truly a standout modern horror entry, or does it lean too heavily on atmosphere over substance?
After deliberation, the jury returns with a unanimous decision:
3 Not Guilty verdicts.
But not for the reasons you might expect.