The best argument for enactment of a federal data breach protection law to replace 46 state statutes is that physical location is not relevant in a society that relies on <b><a href='/mobility-c-212'>mobile</a></b> technologies, says public policy advocate David Valdez.

The best argument for enactment of a federal data breach protection law to replace 46 state statutes is that physical location is not relevant in a society that relies on mobile technologies, says public policy advocate David Valdez.

The best argument for enactment of a federal data breach protection law to replace 46 state statutes is that physical location is not relevant in a society that relies on <b><a href="/mobility-c-212" rel="noopener noreferrer">mobile</a></b> technologies, says public policy advocate David Valdez.

The Case for a 'Borderless' Breach Law

Exclusive, insightful audio interviews by our staff with data breach/security leading practitioners and thought-leaders

Share The Case for a 'Borderless' Breach Law

Sign up to save your podcasts

The Case for a 'Borderless' Breach Law

The Case for a 'Borderless' Breach Law