Here, I argue that there is a clear conflict in the words and actions of a would-be intruder. In one hand, the intruder acts and behaves in a way that is protective; sneaking around and escaping. In the other hand, he or she is careless by writing a long note, likely after the murder; and use items from inside of the home, to commit the crime, then leaving those items behind. And, the note's author, knew that there would not be a ransom money exchange because it would be a matter of time before the body was found. Yet, he or she spent close to an hour writing a rambling letter, attempting in almost every line to hide, and deceive. Even the writing style was likely deceptive. An intruder criminal, I think, is likely to be one way, a fumbling fool, or a cold blooded 'pro'. My point; is it less likely, I believe, an 'intruder' would do all these contradictory things, than a member of the household trying to cover up an unfortunate unintended killing and maybe, sexual abuse. When a member of the home is considered, these contradictory unfortunate events become explainable. By HVB Recorded 9/2/2023 Released 7/21/2023 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6upa16ru_CyayTLG3dEn1RWpaBhf6eCx