In this episode, Justice Speaks travels to London to explore how innovation is transforming the British justice system. The podcast features Phil Bowen, Director of the Centre for Justice Innovation (CJI)—an independent charitable organization dedicated to improving the effectiveness, fairness, and accessibility of justice throughout the United Kingdom.

Mr. Bowen begins by reflecting on his background in North London and his early career in public service. After studying history at St. Andrews University in Scotland, he entered the British Civil Service through the government’s fast-stream program, joining the Home Office. There, he contributed to criminal justice and counterterrorism policy in the years following the September 11 attacks and later served within the Ministry of Justice and the Prime Minister’s Delivery Unit.

A defining period in his career came with a yearlong secondment in New York City to the Center for Court Innovation, now the Center for Justice Innovation. During that time, he conducted research on the growth of problem-solving courts across the United States and worked as a resource coordinator in the Bronx Criminal Court. Observing first-hand how American problem-solving courts combined accountability, treatment, and community engagement, he says, deeply influenced his later work in British justice reform.

Upon returning to London, Mr. Bowen helped establish the Centre for Justice Innovation, inspired by the New York model but designed specifically for the British context. Early funders, he explains, wanted a British-led and British-funded organization governed under UK law, while maintaining collaboration with its U.S. counterpart. Today, the Centre operates as an independent charity with more than twenty staff, supported by charitable foundations and selected government contracts.

Mr. Bowen describes the Centre’s mission as strengthening “the middle bit” of the justice system—the processes that connect policing, courts, and communities. Rather than focusing on enforcement or imprisonment, the Centre works to improve how justice institutions operate and interact. Its goal, he notes, is to bridge the gap between sound policy ideas and effective implementation, helping agencies apply evidence-based practices that make justice work better in daily life.

One major area of CJI’s work is out-of-court resolutions, which divert individuals accused of lower-level offenses away from formal prosecution. Mr. Bowen explains that these programs now account for a growing share of criminal justice outcomes in the United Kingdom. The Centre has helped create national standards for diversion and supports police and youth justice services in applying them consistently. Research confirms, he adds, that limiting formal system contact for low-risk individuals—particularly young people—reduces reoffending and improves long-term outcomes.

Another key focus is smarter sentencing, ensuring that imprisonment is used only when necessary and that community-based sanctions are credible and effective. Mr. Bowen highlights CJI’s research on criminal fines, noting that while fines are the most common sentence in the UK, many go unpaid. The Centre is studying whether nonpayment reflects inability or ineffective assessment of means and how courts can calibrate fines more fairly. He also discusses the expansion of Family Drug and Alcohol Courts and the development of problem-solving courts for women, which offer structured, judicially supervised alternatives to short-term custody.

CJI also advances procedural fairness—the principle that how justice is delivered matters as much as the outcome. Mr. Bowen observes that too many participants leave court unsure of what occurred or why. Promoting transparency, understanding, and respectful treatment, he argues, enhances both compliance and legitimacy. He further notes that remote hearings, now common since the pandemic, require new strategies to ensure fairness and dignity for all parties.

The discussion turns to the Common Ground Justice Project, a new initiative designed to move beyond polarized debates about being “tough” or “soft” on crime. Mr. Bowen describes it as an effort to identify shared priorities among the public and policymakers. Early findings show that most citizens value accountability and rehabilitation and support evidence-based approaches that promote safety and reduce reoffending.

Looking ahead, Mr. Bowen identifies several challenges for reform: overcrowded prisons, limited community resources, and political rhetoric that favors punishment over effectiveness. He calls for a renewed evidence-based discussion of drug policy and greater attention to domestic and sexual abuse cases that require specialized courts and integrated social responses.

Despite these obstacles, Mr. Bowen points to significant progress. National standards for diversion have been adopted, family treatment courts expanded, and court-based advice services now help defendants access debt and housing support. These innovations, he notes, are increasingly cited in national reviews and government policy reports.

As the discussion concludes, Mr. Bowen reflects that meaningful reform seldom arises from sweeping legislation. It comes from consistent collaboration among practitioners, researchers, and policymakers who turn evidence into practice. The Centre for Justice Innovation, he affirms, will continue to serve as a bridge between research and reality—advancing justice through innovation, partnership, and fairness.

We thank Phil Bowen for sharing his insights and experiences on Justice Speaks.

The post The Centre for Justice Innovation: Building a Smarter and Fairer Justice System with Phil Bowen appeared first on Justice Speakers Institute.