the Chanel Lewis trial was not only very odd but also tragic, which is why supporters 

called his sentencing a “modern day lynching” and say they believe that police planted DNA evidence that led to the conviction.

"The jury was tainted and the judge is biased. From the beginning, from the onset, 

Chanel did not get a fair shake," said a Lewis family spokesman.

When Lewis was given the chance to speak during the trial, he continued to deny any wrongdoing.

“I am innocent and I am sorry for the family's loss but I didn't do this,” he said.

Many questions about the behavior of the people involved in the trial were risen; 

a juror in the case had told the New York Times he was pressured into voting

 for a conviction. He said he had doubts about Lewis' guilt, but he feared

 having to stay all night long if a guilty verdict was not reached.

we find this case very interesting and want to bring you our opinion, please let us know what

you think and whether you think Chanel Lewis got a fair trial or not, please rate us on Itunes

and follow us on all major podcast platforms. 

follow us on Twitter @FollowtheFax

if you enjoy please share, thanks in advanced and thank you for listening.