
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Welcome to The Coordination Century, a deep dive into the radical paradigm shift transforming global energy. For 100 years, power was concentrated because generation was scarce: the 20th century was ruled by oil cartels, utility monopolies, and nations with nuclear programs. But the 21st century is fundamentally different, defined not by generation, but by coordination. We have already solved generation—solar is now the cheapest energy source in human history, and battery costs have plummeted 90% in a decade.
The Abundance Paradox and the Coordination Collapse
Paradoxically, this energy abundance is causing a crisis: our coordination systems are collapsing. The old centralized system was built on assumptions—scarce generation, passive demand, and central utility control—all of which have broken. The evidence of system failure is clear: in 2024, Sweden experienced over 700 hours of negative electricity pricing (homeowners paid to give away power) because existing systems couldn’t coordinate supply and demand across time. Furthermore, centralized utility-scale battery parks are saturating high-value markets like UK frequency services, driving revenues down by 50-80%.
Physics dictates that the electrical grid must balance every single second; you cannot store imbalance. This task is exponentially complicated by the arrival of massive distributed assets: by 2030, 40-70 million electric vehicles (EVs) will carry 2,800 gigawatt-hours of distributed storage—more flexibility than the entire European grid was designed to handle. Every EV is a power plant that sits idle 95% of the time, capable of powering a home for a week.
Building the Energy Coordination Primitive
This is not a technology problem—the infrastructure exists. It is a coordination collapse. To solve the “Million Battery Problem,” the energy system needs a “permissioning primitive” similar to OAuth. This primitive transforms the home into an API, where the owner maintains energy sovereignty and controls exactly which applications (such as utility demand response or personal optimization AI) can access their battery’s flexibility and when.
This open, permissioned layer is crucial because coordination unlocks exponential value. While typical households currently earn €350–€1,000/year from their battery, examples in high-volatility conditions (like Sweden) prove optimal stacking and full grid service access can yield €4,000/year. This value will become the baseline as coordination matures, growing toward €1,500–€2,500/year by 2030.
V2G: The Ignition Event and Network Effects
The convergence of technology, regulation, and economics around Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) capability marks the system’s “ignition event”. With standards like ISO 15118 finalized and major OEMs committed to bidirectional charging in 2025, V2G-capable EVs can earn between €1,100 and €2,200 per year through revenue stacking, turning a parked car into a passive income asset.
The coordination layer creates powerful network effects. Unlike centralized battery parks, which cannibalize their own value by saturating single markets, distributed coordination leverages asset diversity (EVs, home batteries, heat pumps) to stack multiple revenue streams—such as frequency regulation, wholesale arbitrage, and peak shaving—preventing market saturation and creating sustained value. The value per connection increases exponentially, not linearly, based on geographic density and data superiority.
The Category War and the Sovereignty Moat
The competition involves incumbents like Tesla (closed ecosystem), utilities (proprietary platforms), and Big Tech (smart home attempts). The winning strategy is not control, but coordination, achieved through an open layer that prioritizes user sovereignty. Sovereignty is the ultimate moat; once homeowners experience full ownership of their energy destiny and realize the significant financial value of their assets, they will not return to centralized dependence.
This approach is not an incremental energy investment; it is a coordination infrastructure investment in a multi-trillion-dollar global market, comparable to category creators like Stripe, Twilio, and Plaid. By creating a new €100 billion annual coordination market that doesn’t exist today, the platform positioned to build the first-mover, winner-take-most network will capture category-defining returns.
The choice is stark: Option A is centralized, permissioned control where value flows to the operators; Option B is distributed, open coordination where value flows to the asset owners at the edges. The physics demands distributed coordination to make the renewable transition successful. The revolution starts now, beginning with the first 1,000 sovereign energy nodes.
By Fredrik AhlgrenWelcome to The Coordination Century, a deep dive into the radical paradigm shift transforming global energy. For 100 years, power was concentrated because generation was scarce: the 20th century was ruled by oil cartels, utility monopolies, and nations with nuclear programs. But the 21st century is fundamentally different, defined not by generation, but by coordination. We have already solved generation—solar is now the cheapest energy source in human history, and battery costs have plummeted 90% in a decade.
The Abundance Paradox and the Coordination Collapse
Paradoxically, this energy abundance is causing a crisis: our coordination systems are collapsing. The old centralized system was built on assumptions—scarce generation, passive demand, and central utility control—all of which have broken. The evidence of system failure is clear: in 2024, Sweden experienced over 700 hours of negative electricity pricing (homeowners paid to give away power) because existing systems couldn’t coordinate supply and demand across time. Furthermore, centralized utility-scale battery parks are saturating high-value markets like UK frequency services, driving revenues down by 50-80%.
Physics dictates that the electrical grid must balance every single second; you cannot store imbalance. This task is exponentially complicated by the arrival of massive distributed assets: by 2030, 40-70 million electric vehicles (EVs) will carry 2,800 gigawatt-hours of distributed storage—more flexibility than the entire European grid was designed to handle. Every EV is a power plant that sits idle 95% of the time, capable of powering a home for a week.
Building the Energy Coordination Primitive
This is not a technology problem—the infrastructure exists. It is a coordination collapse. To solve the “Million Battery Problem,” the energy system needs a “permissioning primitive” similar to OAuth. This primitive transforms the home into an API, where the owner maintains energy sovereignty and controls exactly which applications (such as utility demand response or personal optimization AI) can access their battery’s flexibility and when.
This open, permissioned layer is crucial because coordination unlocks exponential value. While typical households currently earn €350–€1,000/year from their battery, examples in high-volatility conditions (like Sweden) prove optimal stacking and full grid service access can yield €4,000/year. This value will become the baseline as coordination matures, growing toward €1,500–€2,500/year by 2030.
V2G: The Ignition Event and Network Effects
The convergence of technology, regulation, and economics around Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) capability marks the system’s “ignition event”. With standards like ISO 15118 finalized and major OEMs committed to bidirectional charging in 2025, V2G-capable EVs can earn between €1,100 and €2,200 per year through revenue stacking, turning a parked car into a passive income asset.
The coordination layer creates powerful network effects. Unlike centralized battery parks, which cannibalize their own value by saturating single markets, distributed coordination leverages asset diversity (EVs, home batteries, heat pumps) to stack multiple revenue streams—such as frequency regulation, wholesale arbitrage, and peak shaving—preventing market saturation and creating sustained value. The value per connection increases exponentially, not linearly, based on geographic density and data superiority.
The Category War and the Sovereignty Moat
The competition involves incumbents like Tesla (closed ecosystem), utilities (proprietary platforms), and Big Tech (smart home attempts). The winning strategy is not control, but coordination, achieved through an open layer that prioritizes user sovereignty. Sovereignty is the ultimate moat; once homeowners experience full ownership of their energy destiny and realize the significant financial value of their assets, they will not return to centralized dependence.
This approach is not an incremental energy investment; it is a coordination infrastructure investment in a multi-trillion-dollar global market, comparable to category creators like Stripe, Twilio, and Plaid. By creating a new €100 billion annual coordination market that doesn’t exist today, the platform positioned to build the first-mover, winner-take-most network will capture category-defining returns.
The choice is stark: Option A is centralized, permissioned control where value flows to the operators; Option B is distributed, open coordination where value flows to the asset owners at the edges. The physics demands distributed coordination to make the renewable transition successful. The revolution starts now, beginning with the first 1,000 sovereign energy nodes.