While much of the "Metaphysics" seems to deal with something that one might need to understand our own cognitive architecture, in the last half of Book Lambda Aristotle crosses over into cosmology. Is he really right in doing so? Does the science of being qua being really have authority over the cosmos in this way? Or is this Aristotle making a category mistake?

The First Substance: Eternal, Moving, Circular, Actual, Necessary. -  "Metaphysics" Book L.6

Lively discussion of any topic you can imagine informed by the work of Aristotle. In most issues, I try to focus on how his thought might cohere with or relate to Darwinian evolution. I think that there is a fundamental agreement and that this podcast is the best way to explain this. For more on this look at my blog &#34;Zoon Echon Blogon&#34;&#34; at &#34;adamvoight.wordpress.com&#34;.

Society & Culture

Science

Religion & Spirituality

Christianity

Philosophy

Life Sciences

Lively discussion of any topic you can imagine informed by the work of Aristotle. In most issues, I try to focus on how his thought might cohere with or relate to Darwinian evolution. I think that there is a fundamental agreement and that this podcast is the best way to explain this. For more on this look at my blog "Zoon Echon Blogon"" at "adamvoight.wordpress.com".

Share The First Substance: Eternal, Moving, Circular, Actual, Necessary. - "Metaphysics" Book L.6

Sign up to save your podcasts

The First Substance: Eternal, Moving, Circular, Actual, Necessary. - "Metaphysics" Book L.6

The First Substance: Eternal, Moving, Circular, Actual, Necessary. - "Metaphysics" Book L.6