
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Supreme Court’s decision on Roe vs. Wade in 1973 was supposed to end the debate on abortion once and for all. But instead, it has led to decades of division. In our “Future of Abortion” series, The Times looks at abortion from a number of perspectives. Today, we dig into where Roe went wrong.
Read the full transcript here.
Host: Gustavo Arellano
Guests: L.A. Times reporter David G. Savage
More reading:
Where Roe went wrong: A sweeping new abortion right built on a shaky legal foundation
Supreme Court’s pending abortion ruling: What it may mean
When will the Supreme Court make a decision on the fate of Roe vs. Wade?
By LA Times Studios4.2
536536 ratings
The Supreme Court’s decision on Roe vs. Wade in 1973 was supposed to end the debate on abortion once and for all. But instead, it has led to decades of division. In our “Future of Abortion” series, The Times looks at abortion from a number of perspectives. Today, we dig into where Roe went wrong.
Read the full transcript here.
Host: Gustavo Arellano
Guests: L.A. Times reporter David G. Savage
More reading:
Where Roe went wrong: A sweeping new abortion right built on a shaky legal foundation
Supreme Court’s pending abortion ruling: What it may mean
When will the Supreme Court make a decision on the fate of Roe vs. Wade?

25,796 Listeners

7,854 Listeners

396 Listeners

14,620 Listeners

4,658 Listeners

112,236 Listeners

56,509 Listeners

10,204 Listeners

2,399 Listeners

5,462 Listeners

16,353 Listeners

6,384 Listeners

89 Listeners

15,892 Listeners

617 Listeners