
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
The Supreme Court’s decision on Roe vs. Wade in 1973 was supposed to end the debate on abortion once and for all. But instead, it has led to decades of division. In our “Future of Abortion” series, The Times looks at abortion from a number of perspectives. Today, we dig into where Roe went wrong.
Read the full transcript here.
Host: Gustavo Arellano
Guests: L.A. Times reporter David G. Savage
More reading:
Where Roe went wrong: A sweeping new abortion right built on a shaky legal foundation
Supreme Court’s pending abortion ruling: What it may mean
When will the Supreme Court make a decision on the fate of Roe vs. Wade?
4.2
537537 ratings
The Supreme Court’s decision on Roe vs. Wade in 1973 was supposed to end the debate on abortion once and for all. But instead, it has led to decades of division. In our “Future of Abortion” series, The Times looks at abortion from a number of perspectives. Today, we dig into where Roe went wrong.
Read the full transcript here.
Host: Gustavo Arellano
Guests: L.A. Times reporter David G. Savage
More reading:
Where Roe went wrong: A sweeping new abortion right built on a shaky legal foundation
Supreme Court’s pending abortion ruling: What it may mean
When will the Supreme Court make a decision on the fate of Roe vs. Wade?
399 Listeners
14,203 Listeners
1,009 Listeners
25,794 Listeners
110,626 Listeners
55,930 Listeners
10,131 Listeners
2,397 Listeners
5,420 Listeners
16,049 Listeners
6,446 Listeners
5,994 Listeners
84 Listeners
1,179 Listeners
507 Listeners