Many people are asking about the future of KubeCon now that Kubernetes isn’t the central focus. How does it evolve? Is it like re:Invent or VMworld or something else? 

SHOW: 666

CLOUD NEWS OF THE WEEK - http://bit.ly/cloudcast-cnotw

CHECK OUT OUR NEW PODCAST - "CLOUDCAST BASICS"

SHOW SPONSORS:

• JetBrains Datalore: Collaborative data science for your whole organization
• Enhance your core data team’s performance by bringing real-time collaboration, a first-class coding experience, and no-code automations to Jupyter notebooks. Make conversation with business stakeholders easy through the sharing of interactive data apps. Start for free at datalore.team/cloudcast.
• Granulate, an Intel company - Autonomous, continuous, workload optimization
• gProfiler from Granulate - Production profiling, made easy
• CDN77 - Content Delivery Network Optimized for Video
• 85% of users stop watching a video because of stalling and rebuffering. Rely on CDN77 to deliver a seamless online experience to your audience. Ask for a free trial with no duration or traffic limits.

SHOW NOTES:

• The Cloudcast Eps.665 - Reviewing KubeCon Detroit
• Lessons Learned from OpenStack (Eps.489)

WHAT’S THE FUTURE OF KUBECON / CLOUDNATIVECON

KubeCon feels like it’s at a cross-roads now that Kubernetes is not the central focus of the event. So where does it go from here? 

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THERE ISN’T A CENTRAL FOCUS?

• Is it OpenStack Big Tent 2.0?
• Is the CNCF trying to define a stack anymore, or just a governance home?
• Is it VMworld post-2012?
• Is it the re:Invent of Cloud-native technologies?
• Could some company be the GTM for many of the companies at KubeCon?
• Would it be good or bad to have individual project conferences? 
• Are the pre-event event good or bad for people trying to learn a specific domain?

FEEDBACK?

• Email: show at the cloudcast dot net
• Twitter: @thecloudcastnet