70-year-old Benito Flores uses a square frame in his tidy, green front yard as a mini-billboard to oppose state violence:

“KEEP FAMILIES TOGETHER.”

—Reclaimer Benito Flores’ sign

PRESS RELEASE

Mr. Flores has no rent debt.

He has no behavioral issues.

He has a codified right to purchase the home he’s occupied for over five years, which he would like to rightfully own.

With all of these factors in his favor, as far as eviction cases go, Benito is easy to defend.

His lease agreement with the housing authority says he will vacate the premises eventually.

But the Housing Authority promised permanent housing placements, and they haven’t delivered.

What will it take to redeem his right to buy?

Thanks for reading roofless! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Affordable Sales Program

By law, Surplus Residential Property is disposed according to Government Code Article 8.5 [54235-54238.9]. A current low/moderate-income occupant (like Mr. Flores) has the highest priority for purchase, second only to a current occupant who is a former owner of the home.

The law hasn’t stopped Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department. This week, they extracted three similarly-situated neighbors from their Caltrans homes on Shelley Street in El Sereno’s sleepy 710 Corridor.

If Benito is removed from the home, he will become a former tenant, and lose his priority to purchase the property at an affordable price. How shameless can the City, County and State be to work together to come between a peaceful elder and his legal right to own his dwelling?

710 Corridor

How 600 homes in El Sereno and South Pasadena got condemned by the State Department of Transportation “Caltrans” just to be seemingly forgotten for decades is the type of nonfiction that sounds more like Los Angeles lore. Homeowners in the Caltrans Corridor were forced to accept buyouts through a legal freeway expansion process that began with the State acquiring the properties through eminent domain in the 1950s and 60s. Plans changed and changed again, and the 710 stub never got connected to the rest of the highway system as planned. The “just compensation” homeowners were paid didn’t replace single-family homes they were forced to relinquish. Many of them had to downsize and/or leave the State altogether.

Renters would’ve had to seek leases elsewhere, and some would not be able to afford similar accommodations, especially when were competing with other desperate, displaced neighbors. Local landlords took advantage by raising rents. Families, many of whom were immigrants, some living with multiple generations under the same roof, resented loss of the stability they carved-out in El Sereno. Without support of neighbors, marginalized households’ economic injuries didn’t heal the same as they might’ve for more resilient, privileged households, who actually benefit from redevelopment. Generational resentments toward the State over the harm their families endured for this failed freeway project was passed down family trees.

Even though the property transfers were fully legal, and most homeowners were compensated with real checks in amounts considered “fair”, the former residents of El Sereno missed the homes they knew, the neighbors they had, and the community to which they belonged. They told their children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, and for decades, the houses sat like time capsules, portals to better days and living reminders of when they were doing better, things were less expensive and life was simpler.

March 2020 • COVID-19

Slowly, some displaced descendants eventually returned to their old homes in the Corridor, accompanied by other local families needing adequate housing for themselves and their children during the pandemic.

They call themselves Reclaimers.

Former owner-occupants are legally recognized by law as having the highest priority to purchase back their homes at a reasonable price. Next in line are low-income occupants like Mr. Flores. Then, occupants who make up to 150% median income. Occupants with incomes 150% median or less are to be offered the homes at lower, affordable prices. Finally, public and private “housing related entities”, current tenants and former tenants get a chance to buy the homes at fair prices. All of this happens before the public has a chance to bid on the dwellings at an auction.

11/26/20 • Thanksgiving

On Thanksgiving in 2020, everything was calm in the 710 Corridor until the police showed up to break up a community gathering of reclaimers and remove new occupants of surplus homes by force.

When homeless families and elders occupied these government-owned homes during the pandemic, they began the hard work of improving long-neglected properties, allowing children to socially distance in their own bedrooms. As reclaimers and their network of neighbors were enjoying dinner, California Highway Patrol “CHP” violently extracted a mother and hogtied her teenage child in the middle of the street that splits the corridor.

Earlier that day, the reclaimers had been thankful to be thriving in a global pandemic. Now, red-and-blue strobes illuminated an eerie, mostly-empty residential street, animating an advancing army. The onslaught of uninvited State police were ironically forgoing their own families’ festivities for overtime tearing their fragile households apart. The feast was forgotten and fear rightfully froze them. Even their new Councilman, the now- embattled Kevin de León, officially called the images of the CHP raid that circulated in the media “heartbreaking”. They were.

The dizzying lights, shiny guns, clipping walkee-talkees, and shock of instant separation…it all felt devastatingly familiar.

Witnessing the Reclaimers’ roller coaster of re-housing and immediate displacement play out on social media, I was instantly triggered by the similarities to my first ejection from stable housing. When I was in middle school, police detained my dad and told my mother, brother and I to leave our home indefinitely. We had just moved in that year, and it was a school night, and I had homework and planned to hang out with my friends that weekend.

I wanted to support and protect these brilliant, resilient strangers, the Reclaimers, but didn’t know how.

My For more on-the-ground perspectives from the Thanksgiving CHP raid, listen to the Thanksgiving 2020 Special of iheartradio’s “We The Unhoused” podcast (Episode 36) by clicking on the image below.

WTU is produced by host Theo Henderson, who once lived in a public park in the City of Los Angeles, and Jamie Loftus.

The people have spoken…WTU was a double-winner in the 2025 Webby Awards! Thank you for voting in support of Theo’s well-deserved wins.

Full disclosure: I am honored to have spoken as a guest on WTU a handful of times, including last year with my sometimes-Substack co-writer, Zachary Ellison and most recently about my partner J’s legal woes.

2021 HACLA Lease

Mr. Flores and other reclaimers signed agreements with the Housing Authority of LA that said they would vacate the premises in a few years, so the homes could be returned to Caltrans. But, for their end of the deal, the Housing Authority promised to help Reclaimers secure permanent housing, and it didn’t follow through for many.

Benito fears that if he leaves, the “offer of a lifetime” which he is clearly entitled to, by law, will never come. That’s why he won’t leave.

Broken promises

Now, the Housing Authority was moving the goalposts, telling media all they technically have to do to live up to their end of the bargain was pass along referrals. If those referrals were full, unaffordable, inappropriate, or otherwise unavailable, well, that wasn’t their problem. That was basically the illuminating position of LA’s Housing Authority.

One reclaimer, Ruby, did get a sustainable permanent supportive housing unit and another family got a Section 8 apartment. But there were dozens of reclaimers in several homes, and one single-room occupancy “SRO” unit plus one apartment wasn’t enough housing for all of them.

HACLA never did come to the table with suitable replacements or federal vouchers for the rest. But the press covered the individual successes without questioning why universal offers weren’t made to all reclaimers, or why their right to purchase under Roberti wasn’t being acknowledged at all.

It felt wrong to me for the City’s Housing Authority to threaten to remove 70-year-old Benito from his reclaimed, government surplus home of five years without making good on HACLA’s promise to permanently house him elsewhere. It wasn’t simply knowing the diabetic sores on his feet wouldn’t heal on the streets, or the understanding that he would never find a place in Los Angeles on his fixed income of Social Security.

I found it deeply offensive that the Housing Authority would move in a way that is likely cause injury to elder Benito, in order to protect emptiness, enforce displacement, embrace waste and buckle down on the racist redlining restrictive real estate policies of decades past…all while we are in a homelessness state of emergency in the City and County. Seven people are dying on the streets of Los Angeles per day. When Mr. Flores moved in, the same statistic was three daily deaths.

May 2022 • 710 cancelled

The highway extension ultimately got cancelled for good in 2022. It should have been good news for The Reclaimers, whose occupied homes were no longer in its path. That hundreds of residential properties sat vacant for over half a century situated right in the middle of Los Angeles, oblivious to the largest unsheltered homeless population in the nation is probably the most literal metaphor for “the Los Angeles way of doing things”.

2023 • LAHD

The City’s Housing Department, LAHD is supposed to manage affordable housing, whereas the Housing Authority manages public housing and federal subsidies. A tenant can’t be evicted unless they’ve been properly noticed by the landlord.

One would think that an eviction that is being carried out by the City’s own housing department would follow all the rules. But Mr. Flores’ notice hasn’t appeared on the Housing Department’s website. Despite the oversight, three reclaimers, Tina and Sandra and Elitania were violently removed from their Caltrans homes on May 21st:

“On Wednesday May 21, the sheriff’s deputies violently displaced the Reclaimers, Tina, Sandra and Elitania out of their homes.”

—Benito Flores 5/21/25 statement

2025 “NOTICE TO VACATE”

It’s now been five years from when he first occupied his reclaimed home, and Benito Flores has poured love, resources and sweat into making the unit in the older El Sereno duplex into a real home. He wants to exercise his right to become the legal buyer. He wants to become a homeowner, not homeless, or living in a vehicle once again, like he was immediately before moving in.

The Notice to Vacate posted on Benito’s door by LASD was dated Wednesday, May 7th. He also has a pending affirmative case against the Housing Authority about his right to purchase under Roberti, but it is moving at a much slower pace than the efficient removal process.

One week after the date on his vacation notice, Benito was due in court. He showed up to the Stanley Mosk Courthouse with supporters wearing red shirts to show tenant solidarity. The judge rejected his attorney Arturo Gomez 300+-page filing meticulously outlining the many injustices in removing the reclaimers. Though no fault of his own, Benito had lost, but he is still inside his reclaimed home…for now.

Why does a transportation department get to possess housing, but a qualified constituent in need does not? What would happen if the housing department came to possess an abandoned highway?

The surplus residences are finally realizing their purposes as occupied homes full of families, and our authorities are now violently demanding they be kept in a vacant, useless state. The homes are like “offerings” to Gods of real estate or sacrifices to the demon spirits of capitalism in the name of enforced deprivation. It is such a true Los Angeles tragedy.

Help Benito resist removal by signing up for rapid response and showing up for him when the time comes.

* Call elected officials like CD14 Councilwoman Ysabel Jurado, County District 1 Supervisor Hilda Solis, Representative Jimmy Gomez, and Senator Maria Durazo, and demand they meet with Mr. Flores to offer him the opportunity to purchase his home at an affordable price.

* Call the Sheriffs to persuade them not to get in the middle of the City and State.

* Post about the Reclaimers on social media and tag @reclaimingourhomes on Instagram

* Call the media to tell them why Mr. Flores’ story matters: Anyone who owns real estate in LA can be targeted for eminent domain acquisition and have their property taken for public projects that never materialize.

Thanks for reading roofless! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit roofless.substack.com