
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This DEBATE explores layered communication theory, a framework asserting that human interaction functions through a hidden structural layer of "machine code" beneath literal conversation. Unlike standard models of information transfer, this theory suggests we use specific linguistic tools and operator shifts to execute commands that establish hierarchy, boundaries, and social permissions. The text categorizes participants into a hierarchy of perceptual bandwidth, moving from the "fool" who only sees the literal surface to the "magician" who can perceive and manipulate the interaction geometry. Ultimately, the material argues that human connection is a form of structural execution, where even simple manners or flirtation act as complex protocols for risk distribution and resource authorization.
By Joseph Michael GarrityThis DEBATE explores layered communication theory, a framework asserting that human interaction functions through a hidden structural layer of "machine code" beneath literal conversation. Unlike standard models of information transfer, this theory suggests we use specific linguistic tools and operator shifts to execute commands that establish hierarchy, boundaries, and social permissions. The text categorizes participants into a hierarchy of perceptual bandwidth, moving from the "fool" who only sees the literal surface to the "magician" who can perceive and manipulate the interaction geometry. Ultimately, the material argues that human connection is a form of structural execution, where even simple manners or flirtation act as complex protocols for risk distribution and resource authorization.