
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Robert Montgomery, a former Arizona Republican elector, is fighting to have his indictment thrown out. His legal team argues that the Arizona Attorney General’s Office unfairly biased the grand jury by using the phrase “fake electors” over 250 times and failing to properly instruct jurors on key election laws. If the judge agrees, the case could be sent back for a new review. Otherwise, Montgomery and his co-defendants face a long legal battle, with a trial set for 2026. What does this mean for election accountability and future legal strategies? We break it all down.
Feature:
Headlines:
Support the show: https://www.myheraldreview.com/site/forms/subscription_services/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
By Herald/Review MediaRobert Montgomery, a former Arizona Republican elector, is fighting to have his indictment thrown out. His legal team argues that the Arizona Attorney General’s Office unfairly biased the grand jury by using the phrase “fake electors” over 250 times and failing to properly instruct jurors on key election laws. If the judge agrees, the case could be sent back for a new review. Otherwise, Montgomery and his co-defendants face a long legal battle, with a trial set for 2026. What does this mean for election accountability and future legal strategies? We break it all down.
Feature:
Headlines:
Support the show: https://www.myheraldreview.com/site/forms/subscription_services/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.