Gary N. Smith and Robert J. Marks continue their discussion of IBM’s Watson and its grim future in health and medicine. The problem, they say, is that Watson amounts to a real world instance of John Searle’s “Chinese Room”. Computers don’t understand Chinese, English, or numbers for that matter. With reference to many of the leading thinkers in AI research, Gary and Bob consider what it will take for AI to ever achieve something like human thought.

Show Notes

01:00 | John Searle’s “Chinese Room” and understanding numbers03:00 | Following instructions versus understanding. “Is it safe to walk downstairs backwards with your eyes closed?”04:20 | IBM Watson’s ineffectiveness in health and medicine06:45 | What is the crux of Watson’s failure?08:00 | Chamath Palihapitiya’s brutal verdict on Watson09:00 | “Artificial Intelligence”, the 2017 marketing word of the year09:30 | The “algorithm of the gaps”10:00 | Roger Schank and Douglas Hofstadter seeking human thought10:30 | Solving narrow problems to make money11:00 | “Climbing a tree to reach the moon”11:30 | General intelligence, i.e. common sense, the Holy Grail of AI12:45 | Bob’s thesis: computers can only ever do algorithmic things13:30 | Skepticism of Edward Leamer, statistician at UCLA

Additional Resources

Bio and faculty page of Gary N. Smith at Pomona CollegeStandard Deviations: Flawed Assumptions, Tortured Data, and Other Ways to Lie with StatisticsThe AI Delusion by Gary N. SmithOn John Searles’ “Chinese Room Argument” at the Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyThe Association of National Advertisers announce the “Marketing Word of the Year For 2017“Referenced: Roger Schank at Socratic Arts, Douglas Hofstadter at Indiana University, Oren Etzioni at the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Edward Leamer at UCLA