Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share The Liberty Conspiracy Audio Pod, for 6-16-26!
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
The Liberty Conspiracy Audio Pod, for 6-16-26!
Welcome, fellow Conspirators!
Immense thanks to Angela Keaton, of AntiwarDotCom for her insights and strength getting word out to our audience tonight, live, and to all the fine folks who responded so positively to the conversation. We also got to discuss major stories from many excellent journalists covering war, federalism, the tragedy of the commons, and the problems of collectivism in schooling, militarism, courts, and more... - Join the Conspiracy each m-f to spread the propaganda, comrades. ;) Stream us on Rumble or on X, at 6pm, and get the audio pod after each show, via Spotify or Substack - Be Seeing You! Liberty Conspiracy Live 6-16-26 MoU Details, Israel Kills, Angela Keaton, Anarchism https://rumble.com/v7be7ya-liberty-conspiracy-live-6-16-26-mou-details-israel-kills-angela-keaton-anar.html
Share
Subscribe now
And here are some of the key stories we got to cover tonight…
WARThe electronically signed MoU, mediated by Pakistan and Qatar, pauses the aggressive U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran they started in late February, with an immediate ceasefire, lifted naval blockade, and reopened Strait of Hormuz for 60 days. Iran pledges never to pursue nuclear weapons, opening talks on its uranium stockpile, while gaining sanctions waivers for oil sales—no U.S. funds involved. Markets cheered with oil prices dropping over 5% and the Dow topping 52,000, though Israel was denied the text and some U.S. Republicans question Iran’s compliance amid reports of potential firings for opposition. Trump says he will read it aloud, soon, at the upcoming G7 meeting in Geneva…
What is in the “MoU”? Let’s see the major points, as they seem to be laid out. Daniel Davis’ research is excellent, and we grabbed lots of valuable info from him.
Share Gardner Goldsmith
More:
Subscribe now
Share
-Trump also now is claiming credit for the oil prices that rose due to him, now falling, due to his possible agreement to stop attacking. Government hits you, harms you, then releases some pressure, while you still are worse off, and expect you to thank them for their hard work.
Israel continues to breach the MoU. And now, Trump is telling Netanyahu to cut it out, almost ironically saying that Israel need not destroy apartment buildings and kill civilians when targeting “Hezzzbollahhhh”. More than a few of us might be wondering why he never said that about Israel’s catastrophic slaughter in Gaza. Astounding.
Here is a bit more - w some of my thoughts, if you’re curious!
Amazingly, Trump claimed that al Sharaa and his gang of thugs could do the job, admitting as he did that he put then-Jolani now “Sharaa” into power. Sooo, Trump thinks that he can turn to a guy who once was called a “terrorist” (while getting paid by the US to hold the northeastern portion of Syria), to attack so-called “terrorists” in Lebanon who, in fact, are defending against Israeli attacks. That’s Israel, which just took about another 30 km of land north of the Golan Heights, taken from… Syria. None of this makes any sense, but that is not important for people who can point government guns at you and tell you to pay them for your “defense” as they define it.
THEN there is JD Vance, who openly lied on FOX w Hannity lapping it up
And, who now shifts slightly, but still lies, because what the Fox Host describes is correct.
Daniel Davis points out some of Trump’s nonsense, and adds that the US is ready to provide reparations to Iran without calling them that.
And, as we well know, the US has known for a long time that it cannot control the Strait of Hormuz.
Yet, the US claims to be skirting the Iranian control in this small way.
This is one of the best overviews of the immediate situation on the ground in southern Lebanon, via Nima Alkhorshid and Patrick Henningsen.
And this tells us what Iran was able to do, thanks to its geographic and tactical strengths to defend against the US-Israeli aggression.
LEBANONMORE KILLINGS AND LAND GRABS
GAZAThe UK continues to persecute peace advocates: “UK’s Renewed Ban on Palestine Action Confirms Legal Overreach in the Designation of Terrorism - Antiwar.com Blog” LINK
ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO ASSASSINATE A JOURNALISTTRUMP, MILLER, ET AL. VERSUS HABEAS CORPUS, CONSTITUTIONHere’s a little theme to go with it
As we last night noted, the NYT yesterday released what should be an explosive and widely circulated article previewing a new book by Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan due out next week. In the article, the Times covers the fact that Haberman and Swan claim to have obtained internal memos documenting the push by Stephen Miller to have the US government’s Executive Branch lift the Writ of Habeas Corpus. This is not a power “granted” to the Exec Branch. It is reserved to Congress, in Article One. As we explained in our segment on it, which we will post here as a bonus video for you (see below), the move comes as part of a “long line of Congressional and judicial abuses”, just as the Mises Institute included in the title to my 2007 article on attempts by the Bush Administration and Congress to do the same thing in the first decade of the 2000s.
In the piece, I got to explain how Congress repeatedly has attempted to restrict the writ of habeas corpus. These efforts have substituted weaker mechanisms for the constitutional protection against unlawful detention.
In Rasul v. Bush (2004), the Supreme Court held that federal courts had statutory jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions from Guantanamo detainees. The decision required the government to justify detentions through some form of court involvement rather than permitting indefinite holding with no judicial involvement at all. However, the ruling left substantial room for limited administrative “review” processes that did not constitute full habeas corpus hearings. A true writ of habeas corpus proceeding demands that the government appear before an independent Article III judge, present evidence, and demonstrate lawful authority for the detention under standards that allow prompt release if the custody is unlawful. In contrast, the ad-hoc reviews permitted after Rasul often involved non-adversarial military panels with restricted evidence rules, no right to counsel in the same manner, and no power to order immediate release based on constitutional violations. These distinctions fell short of the writ’s requirements under the Suspension Clause and led directly to Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006). There the Supreme Court ruled that the military commissions and associated procedures violated due process of law because they failed to provide the procedural safeguards equivalent to those demanded by the writ of habeas corpus.Congress responded to Hamdan with the Military Commissions Act of 2006. This statute authorized revised military commissions while stripping federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas corpus petitions from alien enemy combatants held at Guantanamo. The Act constituted a direct congressional attempt to circumvent the Supreme Court’s insistence on genuine habeas corpus access by removing the courts’ authority to conduct such hearings altogether.
In Boumediene v. Bush (2008), the Supreme Court held that the habeas-stripping provisions of the Military Commissions Act violated the Suspension Clause. The Court ruled that Congress cannot suspend the writ for these detainees without satisfying the narrow constitutional conditions and without furnishing an adequate substitute for the traditional habeas corpus proceeding. The decision restored the right to full judicial review under the writ rather than the limited alternatives Congress had created.
The same pattern of substituting ad-hoc procedures for the writ of habeas corpus appears in recent internal discussions within the Trump Administration. Reports indicate consideration of limiting or suspending habeas corpus rights for undocumented immigrants to speed deportations, alongside efforts to invoke the Alien Enemies Act without a congressional declaration of war. Such measures attempt to replace the constitutional writ with executive or statutory alternatives that avoid independent judicial examination of the lawfulness of detention.
No statutes currently grant the President authority to unilaterally suspend the writ of habeas corpus, and, even if they passed one, the Suspension Clause of the Constitution reserves that power to Congress alone and only in cases of rebellion or invasion. (This, coming from an anarchist who just wants to remind the politicians of the promises they offered to uphold the document foist on us as the “rules” for the govt foist on us.)
Share
Subscribe now
FEDERALISM - PUBLIC SCHOOLS, TRAGEDY OF THE COMMONSThis reflects the ongoing lack of federalism, and the persistent problem of the Tragedy of the Commons created by public funding of anything “Federal judge blocks Idaho’s punitive bathroom law” LINK This from the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho…
Thanks for reading! This post is public so feel free to share it.
Share
HEGSETH - MACHO MANFor fun, here are some of the goofy brags of the parasite at the head of the “War” Dept. With a little help from …
He loves to lie
And he loves war crimes
AND, on the other side of the ZIONISTA Gang, Huckabee’s apostate stylings…
That’s it for now, all! Many thanks for supporting freedom, and for sharing the links! And remember, you can back us here by becoming a paid subscriber if you would like, and feel free to watch Liberty Conspiracy LIVE on Gardner’s X @gardgoldsmith and on Rumble! Spread the word! Thanks, again! Please feel free to SHARE the links, and join us every M-F at 6 PM on Rumble, and my X @gardgoldsmith — and you also can donate to help the Liberty Conspiracy, itself! Just visit PayPal to help out! You also can mail GG at:
Gardner Goldsmith
PO Box 581
Amherst, NH, 03031 :)
Leave a comment
Share
Subscribe now
View all episodes
By Gardner GoldsmithWelcome, fellow Conspirators!
Immense thanks to Angela Keaton, of AntiwarDotCom for her insights and strength getting word out to our audience tonight, live, and to all the fine folks who responded so positively to the conversation. We also got to discuss major stories from many excellent journalists covering war, federalism, the tragedy of the commons, and the problems of collectivism in schooling, militarism, courts, and more... - Join the Conspiracy each m-f to spread the propaganda, comrades. ;) Stream us on Rumble or on X, at 6pm, and get the audio pod after each show, via Spotify or Substack - Be Seeing You! Liberty Conspiracy Live 6-16-26 MoU Details, Israel Kills, Angela Keaton, Anarchism https://rumble.com/v7be7ya-liberty-conspiracy-live-6-16-26-mou-details-israel-kills-angela-keaton-anar.html
Share
Subscribe now
And here are some of the key stories we got to cover tonight…
WARThe electronically signed MoU, mediated by Pakistan and Qatar, pauses the aggressive U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran they started in late February, with an immediate ceasefire, lifted naval blockade, and reopened Strait of Hormuz for 60 days. Iran pledges never to pursue nuclear weapons, opening talks on its uranium stockpile, while gaining sanctions waivers for oil sales—no U.S. funds involved. Markets cheered with oil prices dropping over 5% and the Dow topping 52,000, though Israel was denied the text and some U.S. Republicans question Iran’s compliance amid reports of potential firings for opposition. Trump says he will read it aloud, soon, at the upcoming G7 meeting in Geneva…
What is in the “MoU”? Let’s see the major points, as they seem to be laid out. Daniel Davis’ research is excellent, and we grabbed lots of valuable info from him.
Share Gardner Goldsmith
More:
Subscribe now
Share
-Trump also now is claiming credit for the oil prices that rose due to him, now falling, due to his possible agreement to stop attacking. Government hits you, harms you, then releases some pressure, while you still are worse off, and expect you to thank them for their hard work.
Israel continues to breach the MoU. And now, Trump is telling Netanyahu to cut it out, almost ironically saying that Israel need not destroy apartment buildings and kill civilians when targeting “Hezzzbollahhhh”. More than a few of us might be wondering why he never said that about Israel’s catastrophic slaughter in Gaza. Astounding.
Here is a bit more - w some of my thoughts, if you’re curious!
Amazingly, Trump claimed that al Sharaa and his gang of thugs could do the job, admitting as he did that he put then-Jolani now “Sharaa” into power. Sooo, Trump thinks that he can turn to a guy who once was called a “terrorist” (while getting paid by the US to hold the northeastern portion of Syria), to attack so-called “terrorists” in Lebanon who, in fact, are defending against Israeli attacks. That’s Israel, which just took about another 30 km of land north of the Golan Heights, taken from… Syria. None of this makes any sense, but that is not important for people who can point government guns at you and tell you to pay them for your “defense” as they define it.
THEN there is JD Vance, who openly lied on FOX w Hannity lapping it up
And, who now shifts slightly, but still lies, because what the Fox Host describes is correct.
Daniel Davis points out some of Trump’s nonsense, and adds that the US is ready to provide reparations to Iran without calling them that.
And, as we well know, the US has known for a long time that it cannot control the Strait of Hormuz.
Yet, the US claims to be skirting the Iranian control in this small way.
This is one of the best overviews of the immediate situation on the ground in southern Lebanon, via Nima Alkhorshid and Patrick Henningsen.
And this tells us what Iran was able to do, thanks to its geographic and tactical strengths to defend against the US-Israeli aggression.
LEBANONMORE KILLINGS AND LAND GRABS
GAZAThe UK continues to persecute peace advocates: “UK’s Renewed Ban on Palestine Action Confirms Legal Overreach in the Designation of Terrorism - Antiwar.com Blog” LINK
ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO ASSASSINATE A JOURNALISTTRUMP, MILLER, ET AL. VERSUS HABEAS CORPUS, CONSTITUTIONHere’s a little theme to go with it
As we last night noted, the NYT yesterday released what should be an explosive and widely circulated article previewing a new book by Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan due out next week. In the article, the Times covers the fact that Haberman and Swan claim to have obtained internal memos documenting the push by Stephen Miller to have the US government’s Executive Branch lift the Writ of Habeas Corpus. This is not a power “granted” to the Exec Branch. It is reserved to Congress, in Article One. As we explained in our segment on it, which we will post here as a bonus video for you (see below), the move comes as part of a “long line of Congressional and judicial abuses”, just as the Mises Institute included in the title to my 2007 article on attempts by the Bush Administration and Congress to do the same thing in the first decade of the 2000s.
In the piece, I got to explain how Congress repeatedly has attempted to restrict the writ of habeas corpus. These efforts have substituted weaker mechanisms for the constitutional protection against unlawful detention.
In Rasul v. Bush (2004), the Supreme Court held that federal courts had statutory jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions from Guantanamo detainees. The decision required the government to justify detentions through some form of court involvement rather than permitting indefinite holding with no judicial involvement at all. However, the ruling left substantial room for limited administrative “review” processes that did not constitute full habeas corpus hearings. A true writ of habeas corpus proceeding demands that the government appear before an independent Article III judge, present evidence, and demonstrate lawful authority for the detention under standards that allow prompt release if the custody is unlawful. In contrast, the ad-hoc reviews permitted after Rasul often involved non-adversarial military panels with restricted evidence rules, no right to counsel in the same manner, and no power to order immediate release based on constitutional violations. These distinctions fell short of the writ’s requirements under the Suspension Clause and led directly to Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006). There the Supreme Court ruled that the military commissions and associated procedures violated due process of law because they failed to provide the procedural safeguards equivalent to those demanded by the writ of habeas corpus.Congress responded to Hamdan with the Military Commissions Act of 2006. This statute authorized revised military commissions while stripping federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas corpus petitions from alien enemy combatants held at Guantanamo. The Act constituted a direct congressional attempt to circumvent the Supreme Court’s insistence on genuine habeas corpus access by removing the courts’ authority to conduct such hearings altogether.
In Boumediene v. Bush (2008), the Supreme Court held that the habeas-stripping provisions of the Military Commissions Act violated the Suspension Clause. The Court ruled that Congress cannot suspend the writ for these detainees without satisfying the narrow constitutional conditions and without furnishing an adequate substitute for the traditional habeas corpus proceeding. The decision restored the right to full judicial review under the writ rather than the limited alternatives Congress had created.
The same pattern of substituting ad-hoc procedures for the writ of habeas corpus appears in recent internal discussions within the Trump Administration. Reports indicate consideration of limiting or suspending habeas corpus rights for undocumented immigrants to speed deportations, alongside efforts to invoke the Alien Enemies Act without a congressional declaration of war. Such measures attempt to replace the constitutional writ with executive or statutory alternatives that avoid independent judicial examination of the lawfulness of detention.
No statutes currently grant the President authority to unilaterally suspend the writ of habeas corpus, and, even if they passed one, the Suspension Clause of the Constitution reserves that power to Congress alone and only in cases of rebellion or invasion. (This, coming from an anarchist who just wants to remind the politicians of the promises they offered to uphold the document foist on us as the “rules” for the govt foist on us.)
Share
Subscribe now
FEDERALISM - PUBLIC SCHOOLS, TRAGEDY OF THE COMMONSThis reflects the ongoing lack of federalism, and the persistent problem of the Tragedy of the Commons created by public funding of anything “Federal judge blocks Idaho’s punitive bathroom law” LINK This from the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho…
Thanks for reading! This post is public so feel free to share it.
Share
HEGSETH - MACHO MANFor fun, here are some of the goofy brags of the parasite at the head of the “War” Dept. With a little help from …
He loves to lie
And he loves war crimes
AND, on the other side of the ZIONISTA Gang, Huckabee’s apostate stylings…
That’s it for now, all! Many thanks for supporting freedom, and for sharing the links! And remember, you can back us here by becoming a paid subscriber if you would like, and feel free to watch Liberty Conspiracy LIVE on Gardner’s X @gardgoldsmith and on Rumble! Spread the word! Thanks, again! Please feel free to SHARE the links, and join us every M-F at 6 PM on Rumble, and my X @gardgoldsmith — and you also can donate to help the Liberty Conspiracy, itself! Just visit PayPal to help out! You also can mail GG at:
Gardner Goldsmith
PO Box 581
Amherst, NH, 03031 :)
Leave a comment
Share
Subscribe now