"The Limits of Western Knowing: Why the Analytic Mind Stumbles Before the Dharma," authored by Nichiryu Mark Herrick, analyzes the common trajectory of Western intellectuals who abandon theistic frameworks, often moving toward agnosticism or secular humanism instead of practice-based non-theistic spiritual traditions like Tendai or Nichiren Buddhism. Herrick argues that this choice is heavily influenced by the academic culture's institutional bias, which prioritizes analytical, textual, and empirical modes of knowing while often dismissing embodied or experiential realization as "mysticism." By referencing the scholar Bart Ehrman’s journey away from Christianity due to the problem of theodicy (divine goodness versus suffering), the text contrasts the Western demand for a philosophical solution with the Mahayana Buddhist approach, which reframes suffering through concepts like Zhiyi's Threefold Truth and focuses on experiential practice to transform one's relationship to pain. Ultimately, the author advocates for the humility of participation in practice traditions, suggesting that they offer a vital path for those who retain an instinctual spiritual hunger but are disillusioned with metaphysical arguments.