The provided text argues that modern society has distorted the definition of love, mistakenly rebranding it as a romantic feeling or a prerequisite for marriage. The author asserts that genuine love is a moral response to helplessness, characterized by selfless care for those who cannot reciprocate, such as children or the infirm. In contrast, marriage should be a practical contract built on functional compatibility, shared effort, and logic rather than fleeting emotional chemistry. According to this perspective, romantic infatuation is a cultural invention that often blinds individuals to structural warning signs in a partnership. True love is not the foundation of a relationship but is instead the sacred commitment that remains when a partner becomes incapable and the initial social contract collapses. Ultimately, the source suggests that love is a universal ethic directed toward human suffering rather than a tool for personal or emotional gratification.