This video reimagines the biblical account of Cain and Abel as a structural metaphor for a conflict between two modes of human consciousness. The text argues that Abel represents interpretive fluency, an advanced ability to perceive layered, symbolic, and "high-bandwidth" meaning in the world, while Cain embodies literalism and the drive for transactional efficiency. This "Abel hypothesis" suggests that the murder was not just a historical event but a psychological fratricide where modern mechanistic thinking suppressed our capacity for poetic truth. The dialogue further explores interpretive asymmetry, debating whether the perceived secrecy of ancient traditions is a malicious act of exclusion or a necessary developmental opacity designed to preserve complex truths for those who have cultivated the tools to understand them. Ultimately, the source serves as an autopsy of how humanity may have traded depth for clarity, urging a return to a more participatory and multivalent way of reading reality.