Mirror of the Youtube video

00:00 Introduction

Is Linux truly secure, or are we clinging to a myth born in the ‘70s?

We expose how the very tools meant to protect — from iptables to LSM — are often too complex, too fragile, and architecturally outdated. It's not just about misconfigurations: it's about flawed design choices baked into the system. Security in Linux isn't automatic — it demands deep expertise. And that makes it inaccessible and unsafe for most.

We back this up with real academic research, measurable performance limitations, and cutting-edge alternatives like formal verification, eBPF, declarative policies, and Zero Trust architectures.

This is not a rant — it’s a call for awareness.

Cornell CS6410 – seL4 Verified Microkernel (2024)

Analysis of Linux OS Security Tools for Packet Filtering and Processing

Linux Security Module Framework (2019)

A Quantitative Study of Firewall Configuration Errors (Avishai Wool, 2004)

X-Trace: Performance Analysis and Diagnosis (USENIX ATC 2012)

Cloudflare Blog – Kernel Bypass and DPDK

IETF Draft – IPv6 Transition Scalability

Performance Testing of Linux Firewalls

Brendan Gregg – Linux BPF Superpowers (2016)

Nelson et al. – Margrave: Policy Analysis Framework (USENIX LISA 2010)

NIST SP 800-207 – Zero Trust Architecture (2020)

Intent-Based Networking with Dialog-based Policy Learning (SIGCOMM CCR 2019)

Kinetic: Verifiable Dynamic Network Control (USENIX NSDI 2015)

Butler Lampson – "Protection" (1974)

Tina Wong – On the Usability of Firewall Configuration (2008)