This week we discuss two major papers: The first was just recently released in Nature and it's titled "The National Lung Matrix Trial of personalized therapy in lung cancer". The second is a few years old, but exemplifies the importance of trial design. We discuss the second paper, titled "A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control" and published in the New England Journal of Medicine with Dr. Mark Friedberg, a health policies and performance measurement researcher.

National Lung Matrix Trial: doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2481-8
SPRINT: doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1511939

Back us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/plenarysession

Check out our YouTube channel: www.youtube.com/channel/UCUibd0E2kdF9N9e-EmIbUew

3.03 The National Lung Matrix Trial & the Major Flaw of the SPRINT Trial with Dr. Mark Friedberg

A podcast on medicine, oncology, & health policy. 
Host: Vinay Prasad, MD MPH from University of California San Francisco.
Tweet your feedback to @Plenary_Session or e-mail plenarysessionpodcast@gmail.com

Science & Medicine

Natural Sciences

Social Sciences

Medicine

Patient advocates, Pharma funding, and is MRD a suitable endpoint

Patient advocates funded by Pharma

FDA makes MRD the basis for AA

Another flawed quality metric. Reviewing the NEJM paper "Beta-Blockers After Myocardial Infarction and Preserved Ejection Fraction".

3.03 The National Lung Matrix Trial & the Major Flaw of the SPRINT Trial with Dr. Mark Friedberg

Download our free app to listen on your phone