
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Most people spend thirty years learning how to put money in.
Almost nobody teaches you how to take it out.
Not how much to take out — that conversation gets plenty of airtime. The order. Which account first. Which source second. Which bucket you leave untouched until the last possible moment — and why the wrong answer to that question can cost you more than a bad market year.
The sequence of your withdrawals is as important as the size of them. Maybe more.
In Episode 9, Tod Long opens Season 2 with one of the least-discussed, highest-impact decisions in retirement income planning: decumulation sequencing. Not a rule to follow — a discipline to maintain, year by year, against your actual tax bracket, for the full length of your retirement.
This episode covers:
The conventional taxable-first framework — what the standard withdrawal sequence is, why the logic behind it is sound, and the specific scenario where applying it mechanically without bracket awareness can actually increase your lifetime tax bill.
The pre-RMD conversion window — why the years between retirement and age 73 are often a retiree's lowest-income years, and why a traditional IRA left untouched in that window will eventually produce forced distributions at a higher bracket than the one you're sitting in right now.
Bracket-filling as a retirement income strategy — what it means to manage your tax bracket every year in retirement rather than following a fixed sequence rule, and how that discipline changes which account you draw from each January.
Richard and Carol — two people with nearly identical assets, the same income need, and the same twenty-year retirement horizon. The difference between their lifetime federal income tax bills: approximately $230,000. The difference between their strategies: sequence — and the discipline to manage it annually rather than by default.
Why this never gets addressed — the structural and incentive reasons that year-by-year bracket management sits outside most standard planning relationships, and why the dashboard you receive each quarter shows you nothing about your tax sequencing picture.
The four-step implementation — how to build a withdrawal sequence that's responsive rather than static, including when to involve a CPA and why the income architecture conversation and the tax compliance conversation need to happen together.
If your savings are primarily in pre-tax accounts and no one has run a year-by-year bracket projection for the decade between your retirement and your first RMD — this is the most time-sensitive conversation in your financial plan.
Schedule The Income Standard Review at theincomestandard.com — no cost, no pitch, just measurement.
By Tod LongMost people spend thirty years learning how to put money in.
Almost nobody teaches you how to take it out.
Not how much to take out — that conversation gets plenty of airtime. The order. Which account first. Which source second. Which bucket you leave untouched until the last possible moment — and why the wrong answer to that question can cost you more than a bad market year.
The sequence of your withdrawals is as important as the size of them. Maybe more.
In Episode 9, Tod Long opens Season 2 with one of the least-discussed, highest-impact decisions in retirement income planning: decumulation sequencing. Not a rule to follow — a discipline to maintain, year by year, against your actual tax bracket, for the full length of your retirement.
This episode covers:
The conventional taxable-first framework — what the standard withdrawal sequence is, why the logic behind it is sound, and the specific scenario where applying it mechanically without bracket awareness can actually increase your lifetime tax bill.
The pre-RMD conversion window — why the years between retirement and age 73 are often a retiree's lowest-income years, and why a traditional IRA left untouched in that window will eventually produce forced distributions at a higher bracket than the one you're sitting in right now.
Bracket-filling as a retirement income strategy — what it means to manage your tax bracket every year in retirement rather than following a fixed sequence rule, and how that discipline changes which account you draw from each January.
Richard and Carol — two people with nearly identical assets, the same income need, and the same twenty-year retirement horizon. The difference between their lifetime federal income tax bills: approximately $230,000. The difference between their strategies: sequence — and the discipline to manage it annually rather than by default.
Why this never gets addressed — the structural and incentive reasons that year-by-year bracket management sits outside most standard planning relationships, and why the dashboard you receive each quarter shows you nothing about your tax sequencing picture.
The four-step implementation — how to build a withdrawal sequence that's responsive rather than static, including when to involve a CPA and why the income architecture conversation and the tax compliance conversation need to happen together.
If your savings are primarily in pre-tax accounts and no one has run a year-by-year bracket projection for the decade between your retirement and your first RMD — this is the most time-sensitive conversation in your financial plan.
Schedule The Income Standard Review at theincomestandard.com — no cost, no pitch, just measurement.