Join me, Karl Michael, as I critically dissect the 2007 Supreme Court decision that controversially tagged CO2 as a pollutant, questioning the political motivations driving this agenda. We examine the roles of influential figures, including liberal judges and the Obama administration, in promoting a climate agenda that misleads the public. This episode challenges the credibility of reports like those from the House Select Committee and the IPCC, which are backed by a select few scientists claiming human activities cause catastrophic global warming.

Discover an alternative viewpoint through the Minority Report by the US Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee, which presents insights from over 650 scientists disputing the so-called climate consensus. I unravel instances of alleged data manipulation, such as a vanished NASA report and altered temperature data, suggesting alignment with specific models. This discussion aims to uncover hidden truths about how the climate change narrative serves to enrich certain groups while compromising our freedoms. 

Would love to hear from you.

Support the show