
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Occasionally, parties ask the Supreme Court to immediately reverse or stay a lower court’s decision without full briefing or oral argument, hoping to skip over potentially years of litigation—and sometimes skipping over the appellate courts entirely. When I was a young lawyer, most appeals of this kind were considered almost frivolous, because the Court so rarely granted them. Today they are much more common, and they have a new name: the “emergency docket” or, more darkly, the “shadow docket.”
On Saturday, The New York Times published 10-year-old leaked emails and memos the justices wrote one another before issuing what many now regard as the pathbreaking ruling that gave birth to the modern shadow docket—a 2016 one-paragraph order that stayed President Barack Obama’s attempt to force power companies away from fossil fuels, something he did without congressional approval.
By Bari WeissOccasionally, parties ask the Supreme Court to immediately reverse or stay a lower court’s decision without full briefing or oral argument, hoping to skip over potentially years of litigation—and sometimes skipping over the appellate courts entirely. When I was a young lawyer, most appeals of this kind were considered almost frivolous, because the Court so rarely granted them. Today they are much more common, and they have a new name: the “emergency docket” or, more darkly, the “shadow docket.”
On Saturday, The New York Times published 10-year-old leaked emails and memos the justices wrote one another before issuing what many now regard as the pathbreaking ruling that gave birth to the modern shadow docket—a 2016 one-paragraph order that stayed President Barack Obama’s attempt to force power companies away from fossil fuels, something he did without congressional approval.