In Episode 26, Keith and Shawnn bring two fresh takes that question long-standing assumptions in the world of pro wrestling. One revisits a bold exit from the 1980s, the other reimagines what it means to win the Royal Rumble. Both takes are sure to spark conversation.

"Tom Zenk did the right thing by walking out on Vince McMahon in 1987."

Shawn argues that Tom Zenk’s decision to leave the WWF during a promising run as part of The Can-Am Connection wasn’t a misstep — it was a principled stand. This take explores the importance of self-worth, business disagreements behind the scenes, and why Zenk’s choice might have been more forward-thinking than most give him credit for.

"The Royal Rumble winner should be able to challenge for any title, not just the world title."

Keith proposes expanding the stakes of the Royal Rumble. Instead of locking the winner into a world title match at WrestleMania, this take suggests giving them the freedom to challenge for any championship — whether it’s the Intercontinental, U.S., or even tag team gold. The idea reframes the Rumble as a more open-ended path to WrestleMania.