Josh Guetzkow, a senior lecturer at Hebrew University with a PhD in sociology from Princeton and a Harvard postdoc in public health policy, discussed his groundbreaking preprint study with me.

The study, conducted with co-authors including Retsef Levi, Tracy Beth Høeg, Joseph Fraiman, and Maccabi Health Services experts, analyzed fetal loss rates among over 220,000 pregnancies in Israel’s Maccabi Health Services database (2016–2022).

Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Using an advanced observed-to-expected analysis, Guetzkow’s team found a significant safety signal: women vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech modRNA COVID-19 shot during gestational weeks 8–13 experienced ~4 additional fetal losses per 100 pregnancies compared to the expected 9 (13 observed). Notably, over half of these losses were stillbirths (post-week 20), with nearly half occurring after week 25! These findings contrast with lower-than-expected losses for influenza-vaccinated women, suggesting a healthy vaccinee effect.

Unlike prior studies, which missed this critical safety signal- by focusing only on early pregnancy or separating miscarriages from stillbirths, the study authors used individual-level health records to adjust for comorbidities and other factors, enhancing reliability. The signal was dose-specific, with two doses (first and second) showing a stronger effect (4 excess losses) than a single third dose (2 excess losses) during pregnancy.

Guetzkow highlighted the absence of clinical trials for pregnant women and criticized public health authorities for recommending vaccination despite known risks, such as lipid nanoparticle placental transfer documented in Pfizer’s own reports, which I covered in early 2023, after being one of the first researchers to discover Pfizer’s 8-page damning document, buried in the FDA’s Pfizer data dump.

Guetzkow debunked misleading claims about 82% miscarriage rates that discredit valid concerns. He also refuted conspiracy theories about Israel receiving placebo vaccines, noting early adverse event reports, including myocarditis, from the Israeli population.

I highly recommend reading Guetzkow’s substack article on this groundbreaking study.

Download the study here.

Below is a link to an Israeli documentary mentioned in the interview.

The testimonies project - a platform for all those who were affected after the corona vaccine

It’s worth watching my previous interview with Guetzkow, where he was one of the first researchers to expose Pfizer’s “Bait-and-Switch.”

If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation.

In this compelling interview, consultant pharmacist Maria Gutschi, BScPhm, PharmD, delivers a thorough analysis of the numerous manufacturing “red flags” tied to the COVID-19 mRNA injections, spotlighting what she terms Pfizer’s “hard fraud.” She reveals her deep concerns about the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding manufacturing issues, contamination, and regulatory oversight.

Before diving into her insights, it’s important to revisit the DNA/SV40 contamination scandal, which underscores the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) concerns raised by Maria in the interview.

Over the last two years, numerous independent labs across the United States, Canada, Germany, Japan, France and more recently the Czech Republic, have verified the presence of plasmid DNA—significantly exceeding the regulatory cap of 10 ng/dose—in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna’s COVID-19 injections with SV40 promoter/enhancer sequence specifically identified in the Pfizer/BioNTech’s product. This alarming discovery was initially uncovered by Kevin McKernan in April 2023.

My earlier investigations on this scandal can be read below.

Manufacturing red flags

In early 2021, Maria Gutschi began her own research on what she calls Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech’s “gene-therapy products.” While digging though the European Medicine Agency’s EPARs (European Public Assessment Reports) on the mRNA vaccines, she was shocked at its content. Unlike typical EPARs she had reviewed over a decade, this one listed numerous "specific obligations"- legally binding requirements for manufacturers, particularly around manufacturing quality- that were unprecedented in scope and focus. Maria emphasized that for biologics like mRNA vaccines, "the process is the product," meaning manufacturing flaws directly affect safety and efficacy.

Whenever you manufacture a biologic, it is always a problem getting the purity right, because the process is the product.

The process on how you make a biological is what you end up with.

The EPAR highlighted significant manufacturing concerns, including:

* Purity and Consistency: The EMA flagged multiple unresolved issues, such as ensuring the spike protein produced was authentic and consistent across batches.

* Specific Obligations: Unlike usual clinical trial follow-ups, five or six obligations focused on manufacturing, which Maria found unusual and indicative of deeper problems.

DNA contamination findings

Maria became involved in investigating DNA contamination in the vaccine vials. Notably, she was co-author of the preprint paper by Speicher et al., published in October 2023, which confirmed Kevin McKernan’s troubling findings of DNA/SV40 contamination in the Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech vials vastly exceeeding the regulatory cap. The presence of plasmid DNA with regulatory sequences (e.g., SV40 in Pfizer) and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) enabling cellular entry raised concerns about genomic integration and biological activity.

Other key issues explored

* Blotgate Scandal: Maria discussed how BioNTech dismissed Western blot anomalies (unusual spike protein sizes) as glycosylation (sugar attachments), a claim the EMA accepted without sufficient follow-up. This specific obligation remains unmet as of 2025. (My investigation into this scandal can be read here.)

* Ribosomal Frameshifting: A Cambridge study (December 2023) confirmed mRNA vaccines could cause frameshifting, leading to aberrant proteins with unknown effects (e.g., toxicity, autoimmunity).

* SV40 Contamination: Found in Pfizer vaccines, the SV40 promoter/enhancer sequence (with an origin of replication) can amplify itself, block the p53 tumor suppressor gene, and potentially promote oncogenes, raising cancer risks. Health Canada was shocked by this undisclosed contamination but took no decisive action after Pfizer resisted accountability.

* Lipid Nanoparticles: Maria criticized their classification as excipients (inactive ingredients), noting their reactive nature and ability to deliver contaminants (DNA, RNA, metals) into cells, bypassing normal regulatory mechanisms- a "Trojan horse" effect increasing risks like DNA integration.

Canadian Open Letter

Maria has spearheaded an open letter that will be sent on March 31 to Canadian MPs, senators, and provincial health officers, highlighting:

* Health Canada’s Findings: FOI requests (ATIPs) revealed regulators’ concerns about DNA variability, SV40, LNPs, frameshifting, and IgG4 immune tolerance, yet action was stifled.

* Demands: Recall the vaccines due to risk outweighing benefits, reclassify them as gene therapies (not vaccines), and fund independent lab studies to investigate mechanisms and adverse events.

* SV40 Cover-Up: Pfizer’s failure to disclose SV40 violated WHO guidelines, constituting "hard fraud," with Health Canada’s response squashed internally despite initial efforts to address it.

If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation.

In this revelatory interview, Covid vaccine injury advocate Anne Merel Kloosterman joins forces with Wybren van Haga, leader of the Dutch BVNL party, to expose a series of what appears to be, Covid-related cover-ups orchestrated by the Dutch government.

Key moments from the interview include:

* Covid vaccine-injured individuals in the Netherlands are forced to conceal the true cause of their injuries, labeling them as “Long Covid” to secure any compensation from the government.

* Anne Merel Kloosterman recounts her heart-wrenching personal story of Covid vaccine injury and highlights her collaboration with Wybren van Haga—the only Dutch MP to openly challenge the government’s harsh Covid measures from the outset.

* Wybren van Haga discloses how a pre-parliamentary Covid investigation group, in which he was a member of, was abruptly dismantled due to the Dutch government’s fear of the truths it might uncover.

* The BVNL party leader details his party’s legal battle against the Dutch government over oppressive Covid curfews and their efforts to gain access to the confidential recordings of the Outbreak Management Team (OMT).

* Kloosterman and van Haga explain their motivations for starting the Corona Damage Foundation, which seeks justice for those harmed by Covid vaccines, as well as the countless businesses driven to bankruptcy by lockdown mandates.

For those interested in supporting the foundation, donations can be made via the link below.

https://stichtingcoronaschade.nl/

If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation.

Dr Jessica Rose, PhD., a computational biologist, immunologist, and applied mathematician, has been at the forefront of analyzing safety data of the Covid shots.

My first interview with her took place in August 2022, which can be watched below.

In my recent interview, Dr Rose delved into her 2021 paper that critically evaluated the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Her findings have highlighted major discrepancies in the data and raised important questions about the transparency, integrity, and accountability of pharmacovigilance systems.

During the interview, she also shared bombshell revelations- raising serious concerns with the handling of data within systems like VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and the UK MHRA's Yellow Card system. Here's a summary of key points from the interview:

* Data Integrity Issues:

A noticeable alteration in VAERS data occurred in late 2022. Specifically, over 100,000 foreign data set reports, linked to the MHRA Yellow Card system, had crucial fields erased, including free-text narratives, symptom descriptions, chronic conditions, and diagnostic details.

The removal of these fields obscured specific safety signals for myocarditis, neuropathy, and pulmonary embolism.

* Implications for Safety Signals:

The manipulation or elimination of data fields compromises the ability to detect adverse event trends. This undermines the systems’ fundamental purpose- to ensure public safety by identifying potential risks!

* Wider Issues with Raw Data:

Jessica expressed broader distrust in the accuracy of “raw” data, citing evidence of manipulation before the data reaches public databases. This completely erodes confidence in the entire process, as raw data is the cornerstone for objective scientific analysis.

* Dangers of self-amplifying mRNA gene-therapy shots:

Jessica raised serious concerns over the risk of recombination between self-amplifying RNA vaccines and native viruses. She spoke about the fact that there has been no informed consent regarding the Phase 1 trial, recently green lit by the FDA on November 14, for Arcturus Therapeutics’ Investigational New Drug (IND) candidate, ARCT-2304, aimed at addressing H5N1 influenza.

Some of the important topics discussed by Jessica in the interview, can be read about below:

My mission is to deep-dive into public interest stories, which the mainstream media avoids but I cannot do that without your help. If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation to support my work of forensic-style investigative journalism.

My second interview with Wouter Aukema, senior data patterns & forensics analyst, who has over 30 years of experience working with governments and corporations- is the most explosive yet. The first interview can be watched below.

For the past few years, Wouter Aukema and his team have been downloading voluminous amounts of weekly data on the case safety reports on drugs and vaccines submitted to the European Medicines Agency’s EudraVigilance database and Dutch government institutions, such as the Dutch Health Institute. His painstaking work has led to the discovery of what can easily be described as massive data fraud, which he has written about here.

Back in December 2021, Dutch parliamentary member Pieter Omtzigt brought a motion calling for an independent investigation on excess deaths in the Netherlands. He also called for the CIMS, which translates to "COVID Vaccination Information and Monitoring System” maintained by the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) for monitoring vaccination records related to COVID-19 vaccines, to be made available to independent researchers. Omtzigt’s motion was unanimously accepted in parliament.

Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Rather than choose to act upon the motion, it appears the Dutch government not only stalled but sabotaged transparent access to the vaccine database. Moreover, it also rendered it unusable by deleting a staggering number of personal records. In the process of the government’s decision to transfer all the Covid vaccination records to the Dutch Statistics Bureau- over 870,000 records were systematically deleted of people who had received their first dose of a Covid vaccine and subsequently died or emigrated (between the period of January 2021 and January 2024).

It is only because of Wouter and his team’s painstaking work by weekly downloading the data, that has made it possible to spot this huge anomaly. This discovery has massive ramifications as the manipulated data makes it impossible for there to be any meaningful assessment on excess deaths in relation to the Covid vaccines, in the Netherlands.

However, the data crimes do not end there and are not exclusive to the Netherlands- at around 37 minutes into the interview, Wouter dropped the biggest bombshell of all! He exclusively informed me that according to his systematic downloading of the data from EudraVigilance (which includes case safety reports from around the world not just the EU)- 40% of worldwide serious case safety reports (including hospitilization and death) in relation to Covid vaccines (only) have been REMOVED from the European Medicines Agency’s database from October 2021-November 2022. In addition, case safety reports have also been retroactively modified, after their data lockpoint (DLP).

Wouter presented his evidence of what appears to be horrific data fraud/manipulation by revealing a damning slide from his 140-page forensic report, yet to be published. The screenshot of the slide below, reveals a graphical representation of the cumulative number of reports mentioning fatal events (deaths). Notice, that the biggest discrepancy between the cumulative number of deaths recorded by Aukema and his team (blue graph line) and the EMA’s (orange graph line) is shown in the fourth column- these are the deaths (fatal events) following the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid vaccine.

According to Pfizer/BioNTech’s Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSURs) submitted to the EMA, which I have previously investigated here and here for Children’s Health Defense Europe, the cumulative number of reported deaths following their vaccine through to November 2022 was 8,322. However, the number of deaths based on Aukema and his team downloading weekly the case safety reports mentioning fatal events following the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine- reveals a markedly higher total of 10,193. Disturbingly, it appears almost 20% have been deleted from the EudraVigilance database.

When asked the question on what he intends to do with this damning evidence, Wouter said:

“In the old days, we would submit it to the auditor of the EMA and we would trust that they would follow up on it, but what can we do today? Who can we trust?”

See more of Wouter and his team’s amazing work:

https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/aukemahttps://public.tableau.com/app/profile/aukema/vizzes

Support their work:

https://www.givesendgo.com/medicine_vaccine_safety_db

My mission is to deep-dive into public interest stories, which the mainstream media avoids but I cannot do that without your help. If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation to support my work of forensic-style investigative journalism.

It was a pleasure to be on TNT Radio’s live show: “Locked & Loaded with Rick Munn” discussing Part 1 of my latest investigation.

Sadly, it was to be my last interview on the independent media platform given that their funding was pulled recently and they have ceased operations, leaving a wide hole in the alternative media space.

My mission is to deep-dive into public interest stories, which the mainstream media avoids but I cannot do that without your help. If you find value in the work I do, please consider a paid subscription or make a one-off donation to support my work of forensic-style investigative journalism.

Dr Clare Craig is a diagnostic pathologist. She practised in the NHS for 15 years, becoming a fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists. 

Since January 2021 she has co-chaired Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART) with Dr Jonathan Engler. This is a multi-disciplinary body of experts who have provided an independent source of information on covid issues. 

Dr Craig is one of the group of experts who were called to submit Witness Statements in the Covid-19 Public Inquiry – Module 4 on Vaccines. The Inquiry has postponed Module 4 until January 2025 (to start with, it was postponed indefinitely) with only 3 weeks alloted to watered down issues such as “unequal vaccine uptake.”

Dr Craig calls the Covid Public Inquiry “a farce which is just eating through money. What it becomes is a years long excuse for not addressing the problems in the political forums. They just hand wave and say, oh, that's good, that's going on over there. We don't need to think about it because they are, which is ridiculous because they're not.”

The delays and flaws of the Covid Public Inquiry galvanized the expert group to do it themselves. In reference to the genesis of the People’s Vaccine Inquiry, the pathologist shared:

“We thought let's do it and get it out to the public as soon as possible. So that's what we've done. We've kind of come together along with a few other people who have important evidence to give, to present the core important facts for the public to hear.”

During the in-depth interview an extensive range of issues were discussed:

* Covid vaccines being associated with a huge rise in illness and deaths.

* The lack of post-mortems (autopsies) being done

* The lack of transparent data

* The Midazolam scandal and DNRs in care homes and hospitals

* No protection from the vaccines when there’s a new variant

* Excess deaths observed around the world

* DNA and SV40 contamination of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines and the risk of cancer

Visit the People’s Vaccine Inquiry and take action!

If you value the work I’m doing, please consider becoming a paid subscriber or upgrade to one and help support independent investigative journalism!

"The Needle’s Secret" is Marc Girardot’s debut book. Living in Paris, France, he is a father of four and an experienced business executive with an MBA from INSEAD. His career includes advising senior executives, particularly in the automotive industry and on biotechnology strategies for a pharmaceutical company.

During the Covid crisis, Girardot became a proponent of proportionate measures and natural immunity, joining the organization PANDA to offer scientific advice. His 2021 article questioning the necessity of vaccines for Covid-recovered individuals garnered significant attention, earning accolades and endorsement from Nobel Prize winner Michael Levitt.

Marc Girardot's main findings on vaccines are as follows:

* Accidental IV Injections: All vaccine accidents are caused by inadvertent intravenous (IV) injections, which are inevitable with intramuscular injections.

* Intramuscular Injection Flaws: These injections have a long-standing design flaw, especially evident during large vaccination campaigns (e.g., 1976 swine flu, Gulf War, 1998 anthrax, 2016 dengue).

* Impact of IV Injections: IV injections bypass natural protections, sending a high-density cloud of vaccine particles (a "Bolus") that can cause significant immune-mediated damage in the cardiovascular system and organs, and potentially damage stem cells, leading to cancer or genetic disorders.

* Cancer Theory: Proposes a new theory of cancer based on stem cells being the origin, supported by studies.

* Testing the Bolus Theory: Suggests using odds ratios to compare sick populations with the general public, noting correlations between conditions like autism and other diseases (e.g., Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, ALS, hearing/vision impairment, congenital heart disease, Celiac, obesity, cancer, genetic disorders).

* Vaccines and Modern Illnesses: Asserts that all vaccines harm similarly and are likely behind the rise in modern illnesses over the past 40 years (excluding traditional flu vaccines).

* Stem Cell Therapy: Promotes the potential of oxygen and other stem cell therapies (HBOT, NBOT, possibly ozone) to repair endothelial damage and revascularize damaged areas as a solution for many modern illnesses.

If you value the work I’m doing, please consider becoming a paid subscriber or upgrade to one and help support independent investigative journalism!

My bombshell interview with data expert and ethical computer hacker, Wouter Aukema from the Netherlands, exposes the true horrors of the trove of data buried within the European Medicines Agency’s EudraVigilance case safety reporting system- like never before!

Wouter Aukema, a data forensics analyst with over 30 years experience, teamed up with a software expert to develop a tool where they were able to download ALL 15 million case safety reports over the past 20 years, for 6000 medicinal drug products and substances (within and outside of Europe) including the Covid-19 experimental shots.

Up until now, the only way the scientific community had been able to analyse side effects of a specific drug was by using the highly cumbersome and opaque interface of the EMA’s database system. In the video interview, Aukema demonstrated the many problems with the system and explained:

If I would want to understand the history of all side effects for this particular drug, I need to repeat this action five times for one drug. If I want to go back to 2018, I need to do that seven times for one drug. Mind you, seven times, 6,000 different drugs and substances. That's 42,000 times that I need to click on buttons, download files. This is undoable. Nobody can do this.

However, thanks to Aukema and his colleague’s unique tool, the public can see for the first time the true extent of the carnage caused by the Covid-19 shots.

With colour coded visual graphs and diagrams, the damning data is presented for the very first time in such an unequivocally transparent way- in stark contrast to the EMA’s nebulous system-leading one to think that obscuring the reports of the Covid vaccine side effects and indeed, for other drugs, was perhaps, intentional.

Aukema’s dashboard of data shockingly showcased a three fold increase in case safety reports for the Covid-19 vaccines (at the start of the rollout) compared to all the other drug products and substances- over the past 20 years! (The blue graph line represents the number of case safety reports for the Covid-19 vaccines. The orange graph line is for the other 6000 drug products and substances.)

Aukema went on to reveal:

What is the most reported side effect reported for all the COVID vaccines?

I was flabbergasted by this. It is COVID itself..But I thought the COVID vaccines were going to prevent COVID.”

The diagram below depicts the reaction, “Covid-19” as the largest blue bubble.

(In early 2022, I wrote the Substack piece, “Was Pfizer's 95% vaccine efficacy fraudulent all along?” It drew quite a bit of attention from the mainstream media evidenced by their string of targeted attack pieces against my article. In my piece, I calculated that the vaccine efficacy of the Pfizer/BNT vaccine was more in the realm of 12% not 95%, based on Pfizer’s own data provided in a FDA briefing document from December 2020, which I sourced from the FDA’s website.)

It has become increasingly apparent, evidenced by the loud signal coming from the EudraVigilance database revealing Covid-19 as the most reported side effect of the Covid-19 vaccines- that my earlier calculation was not too off the mark.

Aukema disclosed more bombshell findings from the data (this time for all other drugs, not including the Covid vaccines)- the sudden explosion starting from January 2023 onwards of case safety reports for 2 specific drugs.

* Keytruda, a cancer drug mainly used in adults for cancers that are advanced, have spread or returned, are not responding to other treatments or cannot be removed by surgery.

* Inflectra, an anti-inflammatory medicine to treat diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and psoriasis. It is usually used when other medicines or treatments have failed.

What could have caused such a sudden demand (hence increase in reporting of side effects) for a cancer drug and a medicine for chronic inflammation from the start of January 2023? Could there be a link between the increase in use for these drugs to treat certain side effects of the Covid vaccines?

During the interview, Aukema highlighted another critical finding-Myocardial Infarction (heart attack) was one of the top reported cardiac disorders following Covid vaccination. The data expert made a point of stating how pericarditis and myocarditis were listed as known side effects in the packaging inserts of the Covid vaccines but myocardial infarction was surprisingly absent.

Behind each case saftey report lies a person suffering from a side effect, which for some could be life-altering. It was an honour to have Anne Merel Kloosterman on the zoom call. She is the representative for the Covid vaccine injured for the Netherlands. Anne suffered from debilitating paralysis and a whole host of other problems, after her second dose of the Moderna vaccine, which she took after fearing it would become mandated by the universities.

She shared an important point, when the subject of excess deaths was referenced.

In the Netherlands they covered up the excess mortality data with privacy legislation, thanks to the amendment law of January 1st 2020, regarding access to medical records for next of kin.

They made it legally impossible to retrieve these data and because of privacy legislation you may only perform pathological examinations of the deceased if a crime is likely have been committed or if the declaration has been signed. If the deceased did not sign the declaration as a living person, the official cause of death will remain private.

In addition, there was also a redefinition of the status “vaccinated”. It takes 14 days for Moderna, Pfizer and Astra Zeneca and even 28 days for Janssen (Johnson & Johnson), before a person is defined as vaccinated, so if you die within that certain period of time the deceased will be recorded as unvaccinated.

Anne went on to describe what she has experienced as a result of speaking out about Covid vaccine injuries- the shameless shutting down of her Instagram and Linked In social media accounts.

She also made the poignant comment how the vaccine injured have been gas-lit from both sides: the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.

For anyone wanting access to the dashboard and collection tool, created by Wouter Aukema and his colleague- the following information has been taken from Aukema’s post on X.

Python script to collect all cases from EMA: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Zs8HiB3W-bd77OspdTrnhb8WiXsskfTM/view?usp=sharing (developed with Twan from https://vanderpoelsoftware.com

Example Dashboard, populated with data up to march-2023: https://drive.google.com/file/d/16RRvQJZ6VEyAF_Gm4DDPtE200esXTlSM/view?usp=share_link 14d trial version of Tableau: https://tableau.com/products/desktop/download

A special thanks to Andrew Bridgen who alerted me to Wouter Aukema’s work.

If you appreciated this post, perhaps you might consider a paid subscription so I can continue creating more content like this.

In the last interview I gave to the BBC, they asked me, why are you sacrificing your career on the hill of vaccine harms?

And I said, that's because that's the hill you're killing my people on.

In this compelling interview with Andrew Bridgen, Independent Member of Parliament for North West Leicestershire, he shares his struggles in being an almost solitary advocate in the UK Parliament on various critical issues. These include Covid-19 experimental vaccine harms, excess mortality rates, opposition to the WHO pandemic treaty, and proposed amendments to international health regulations. Bridgen also opens up about the personal toll of bringing attention to these pressing matters.

Details about the event where world leading experts testified at the UK’s parlimentary office on December 4th, can be read below.

Details about Bridgen’s first-adjourned debate on excess deaths, secured last October, can be read below.

Details on the most recent debate on excess deaths can be read about below.

If you appreciated this post, perhaps you might consider a paid subscription so I can continue creating more content like this.