The past 10-15 years of business have been dominated by an obsession with efficiency: How can we accomplish more work with fewer employees to save money and maximize profitability?

Certainly, continued efforts to reach new levels of efficiency are important to business growth and sustainability. But the most recent three-to-five years have shown this quest for ultimate efficiency has come with a grave cost: loss of efficacy and employee burnout.

We see it in national news stories and business case studies. We see it in our local community. But what we’ve found most interesting are the results of our efforts to mitigate burnout and loss of efficacy for our own clients. One key to successfully supporting these organizations is a policy we implemented several years ago: We always have a minimum of two people on every client account.

We noticed an immediate shift in our own team’s performance and our clients’ overall satisfaction when we implemented this policy. With this structure, an organization’s internal marketing and communications employee (if the organization has a “department of one”) or employees not only have a public relations vendor, they get an entire team. There are several layers of support, and strategic redundancy, built into the equation.

“Redundancy” is not a bad word. For many reasons, it is critical for organizations to ensure there are multiple people who are capable of performing the same tasks. They may not both perform that same task every day, but having multiple people who can support each other is helpful for short-term needs and long-term growth.

When an employee is sick, needs time off to care for a family member, or simply needs to be pulled onto a large project that requires most of their time, your organization needs someone to “cover” for them – so the work continues to get done instead of piling up and creating a backlog.

Having a proper team also drives long-term innovation because each member brings a unique perspective and can share different ideas or observations. When everyone on the team is firing on all cylinders, the organization is achieving greater results than ever before—because no one is burned out.

Worried about the expense of investing in more employees? Keep in mind that employee burnout and turnover can ultimately be more expensive for an organization than adding a few team members in the first place. It can result in errors, oversights, delays, missed deadlines, costly hiring processes, and even major liabilities.

So, should you just abandon efficiency? Absolutely not. We recommend these tips to successfully balance efficiency and redundancy:

In our business of public relations, the reason we practice and advocate for additional support and redundancy on teams is to ensure we are always able to proactively identify and pursue strategic opportunities to share positive stories from and about the organization. This helps ensure our clients’ reputations are well managed and supports their business goals without interruption. Depending on the industry in which your business operates, or the department in which you work, the specific reasons for additional support might look a little different. But the result is the same for everyone: smoother operations, higher quality work, happier and more productive employees, faster innovation, and long-term success.

If you are a business owner or leader, I encourage you to evaluate your current department teams – and be honest! It’s important to recognize the long-term value of having a strategically selected team in any department, rather than relying on just one person to handle everything.

If you’re someone who is currently on an understaffed team, I hope this helps you make the case to your boss that some additional resources can actually save money long-term while improving productivity and results for the organization.

The post The Strategic Minute: The solution for employee burnout? Proper team structure. appeared first on Strategic Communications, LLC.