Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share THE SUSAN REINERT MURDER: HOW A TEACHER PROGRAMMED A KILLING (PART 2)
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
THE SUSAN REINERT MURDER: HOW A TEACHER PROGRAMMED A KILLING (PART 2)
Send us a text
September 18, 1992: the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturns Jay C. Smith’s conviction—and bars a retrial for prosecutorial misconduct so extreme the court says trying him again would violate double jeopardy. After 13 years in prison—seven on death row—Smith walks free. Meanwhile, William Bradfield remains locked up on three consecutive life sentences.
And the children—Karen Reinert (11) and Michael Reinert (10)—are still missing.
In Part 2, the case shifts from a murder investigation into a system-level collapse: hidden evidence, jailhouse testimony, courtroom strategy, and the constitutional ruling that ended the Commonwealth’s ability to prosecute Smith forever. We follow the investigation’s most disturbing throughline—how “programming” can look like prediction, how an alibi can look like architecture, and how silence can become the final lock on an ending no one can recover.
In this episode:
- The Supreme Court ruling that freed Jay C. Smith and permanently barred retrial
- The investigation timeline and why Bradfield’s alibi raised red flags
- The jailhouse confession testimony—and the credibility war around it
- Brady violations, prosecutorial misconduct, and how the system broke the case
- The haunting question that remains: where are Karen and Michael?
Content warning: violence against women and children.
Check out our website at crimery.show
Music: "No Copyright True Crime Investigation Music"
Artist: Soundridemusic
https://youtube.com/@soundridemusic
Support the show
CRIMERY
Tip line & inquiries: [email protected]
If you found this episode valuable, follow, rate, and review in your podcast app it really helps others find the show.
Legal: Everyone mentioned is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Content may include descriptions of violence. Listener discretion advised.
©2025 CRIMERY. All rights reserved.
View all episodes
By Crimery Inc.Send us a text
September 18, 1992: the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturns Jay C. Smith’s conviction—and bars a retrial for prosecutorial misconduct so extreme the court says trying him again would violate double jeopardy. After 13 years in prison—seven on death row—Smith walks free. Meanwhile, William Bradfield remains locked up on three consecutive life sentences.
And the children—Karen Reinert (11) and Michael Reinert (10)—are still missing.
In Part 2, the case shifts from a murder investigation into a system-level collapse: hidden evidence, jailhouse testimony, courtroom strategy, and the constitutional ruling that ended the Commonwealth’s ability to prosecute Smith forever. We follow the investigation’s most disturbing throughline—how “programming” can look like prediction, how an alibi can look like architecture, and how silence can become the final lock on an ending no one can recover.
In this episode:
- The Supreme Court ruling that freed Jay C. Smith and permanently barred retrial
- The investigation timeline and why Bradfield’s alibi raised red flags
- The jailhouse confession testimony—and the credibility war around it
- Brady violations, prosecutorial misconduct, and how the system broke the case
- The haunting question that remains: where are Karen and Michael?
Content warning: violence against women and children.
Check out our website at crimery.show
Music: "No Copyright True Crime Investigation Music"
Artist: Soundridemusic
https://youtube.com/@soundridemusic
Support the show
CRIMERY
Tip line & inquiries: [email protected]
If you found this episode valuable, follow, rate, and review in your podcast app it really helps others find the show.
Legal: Everyone mentioned is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Content may include descriptions of violence. Listener discretion advised.
©2025 CRIMERY. All rights reserved.