The backlog of criminal cases (especially for those relating to fraud) has increased considerably. It is reaching worrying levels resulting in administrative difficulties and substantial cost, both in financial and emotional terms.

In the past year, the number of outstanding Crown Court trials has risen by over 40% with trial dates now being fixed up to four years after the time of the alleged offence. With the delays causing significant evidential difficulties – not to mention the toll it takes on all parties who are left in limbo for prolonged periods of time – a proposal to reduce the number of jurors has been put forward as a solution to addressing the backlog.

In this episode, Professor Michael Saks joins us to discuss whether this proposal really will solve the problem, what the unintended consequences might be, and whether it is worth the trade-off. 

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.