A sensational health headline claims GLP-1 weight loss drugs like Ozempic cause 'premature aging' with hollowed, saggy faces. But what if the real story is dramatically different? This episode unravels the truth behind 'Ozempic face,' exposing how a catchy term invented by a cosmetic dermaturer has transformed normal weight loss effects into a medical panic. Diving deep into scientific research, we reveal that facial changes are a natural consequence of rapid fat loss—not a toxic drug side effect. Listeners will discover how media sensationalism can distort medical understanding and potentially discourage people from life-saving treatments by weaponizing cosmetic fears. A quick note—the opinions and analysis shared on Truth Seekers are our own interpretations of published research and should not be used as medical, financial, or professional advice. Always consult qualified professionals for decisions affecting your health or wellbeing.

A deep dive into a 2025 study about metformin's interaction with exercise. Explore how sensationalist headlines misrepresent scientific research by claiming the medication 'sabotages' workouts, when the actual research shows only a modest reduction in exercise adaptations—not an elimination of benefits. A quick note—the opinions and analysis shared on Truth Seekers are our own interpretations of published research and should not be used as medical, financial, or professional advice. Always consult qualified professionals for decisions affecting your health or wellbeing.

Alex and Bill break down a viral headline claiming brain training can reverse 10 years of aging. They reveal the study's actual findings: a small biomarker change with no significant cognitive improvement, highlighting the gap between scientific research and sensationalist health reporting. A quick note—the opinions and analysis shared on Truth Seekers are our own interpretations of published research and should not be used as medical, financial, or professional advice. Always consult qualified professionals for decisions affecting your health or wellbeing.

Alex and Bill deconstruct a viral BMJ study claiming dark chocolate reduces diabetes risk by 21%. They expose how media headlines misrepresent observational research, revealing the critical difference between correlation and causation in health reporting. The episode breaks down relative vs. absolute risk, highlighting how healthy lifestyle choices matter more than any single food.

A deep dive into a recent Oxford study claiming the Shingrix vaccine could reduce dementia risk. Experts Alex and Bill break down the critical difference between an interesting scientific association and proven causation, exposing how headlines misrepresent complex medical research. They explore propensity score matching, healthy vaccinee bias, and why observational studies can't definitively prove vaccine-driven cognitive protection.

A deep dive into the viral cold plunge trend revealing scientific evidence that challenges influencer claims. Explore how temporary physiological responses are being marketed as lasting health improvements, with hidden cardiac risks that most people don't understand.

Investigative deep dive into the viral TikTok trend claiming two cups of beans daily can cure anxiety. Alex and Bill break down the scientific reality behind the 'BeanTok' phenomenon, exploring the gut-brain connection, actual research on legumes and mental health, and the often-ignored digestive consequences of sudden high-fiber intake.

Investigative deep dive into NAD+ IV therapy, exposing the massive gap between celebrity endorsements and scientific evidence. Explores how minimal human research, biological limitations, and placebo effects drive a multi-million dollar wellness trend costing patients thousands per year.