The Truthfulmanipulation Podcast
Download on the App Store

The Truthfulmanipulation Podcast episodes

  • #114 One Person One Vote, One Billionair 40 Million Commercials

    Dave Kelsey explores how unlimited political spending, super PACs, and dark money let wealthy donors amplify messages and shape election agendas — buying attention, not ballots — and why that raises ethical concerns for a healthy democracy.

    He calls for greater transparency and disclosure and urges voters to check who funds ads, verify claims, and protect their own judgment against manipulation.

    41 min
  • #113 The U-M Supercenter: Can We Put All The Projects On One Map?

    This episode examines the cluster of infrastructure projects around Textile Road — the proposed U‑M computing center, Ford Lake Dam, gas line relocations, electrical transmission work, and a planned substation — and asks for a single map and timeline to clarify how each piece relates.

    Hosts Dave Kelsey and H. Daniel Majahid urge transparent answers from utilities, the university, and township officials, proposing four clear categories (unrelated, pre‑existing, modified, or project‑specific) to remove confusion and rebuild public trust.

    36 min
  • #112 When Democracy Is For Sale: Can Money Buy a Politician?

    Hosts Dave Kelsey and H. Daniel Mujahid examine how political spending and persuasive tactics can shape voter judgment without outright lies. Using super PACs and real campaign examples, they explain how true facts can be framed to create misleading impressions.

    The episode explores access, transparency, and the ethical pressures politicians face when money and influence grow large, and offers practical questions listeners can use to evaluate political ads.

    Ultimately, the show urges citizens to check who paid for messages, seek missing context, and preserve independent judgment in a media environment driven by repetition and emotion.

    36 min
  • #111 The U-M Supercenter: What Would Earn Community Trust?

    Dave Kelsey and H. Daniel Mujahid examine the University of Michigan’s proposed supercomputing facility in Ypsilanti Township, focusing on the October 1 town hall, Los Alamos’ role, the project’s financial structure, and community concerns about governance, transparency, and local impacts.

    The hosts outline practical steps to rebuild trust: independent moderation, enforceable community commitments, clear financial and ownership disclosures, meaningful local participation, and regular public accountability so residents know who is responsible, what will change, and when.

    43 min
  • #110 When Ads Lie: Spotting Political Deception

    Hosts Dave Kelsey and H. Daniel Mujahid break down how political ads use falsehoods, selective editing, missing context, and evocative imagery to mislead voters, and why that matters for democracy.

    The episode gives concrete tips for evaluating ads: identify the claim and sponsor, find the source material, look for omitted context, seek reputable challenges, separate facts from forecasts, and correct misinformation you share.

    33 min
  • #109 Who Writes AI’s Rules — The Public or the Billionaires?

    Hosts Dave Kelsey and H. Daniel Mujahid examine who should set the rules for artificial intelligence: the public through accountable government or the companies and investors who profit from it. They explore how unchecked industry control can shift risks onto workers, communities, and democracy, and why transparency, independent testing, human appeals, data rights, and community consent are essential.

    This episode outlines practical principles for AI policy, discusses impacts on jobs, elections, and public information, and urges citizens and institutions to insist on meaningful oversight, shared responsibility, and ongoing review so technology expands human dignity rather than concentrating power.

    35 min
  • #108 The U-M Supercenter: When Everybody Has Rights, Who Has Responsibilities?

    Hosts Dave Kelsey and H. Daniel Mujahid attend a Ypsilanti Township town hall on the University of Michigan–Los Alamos research computing project to probe key issues: the 200 jobs originally touted versus roughly 30 permanent on-site roles, whether the facility is a data center or a high-performance research computing center, and how responsibility is shared under a 90/10 operational split.

    The episode raises concerns about transparency, community benefits, governance, public funding, and why an expert attendee was denied entry. The hosts ask clear questions about what changed, who is accountable, and what measurable benefits the host community will receive.

    Ultimately, the episode calls on institutions claiming leadership to explain decisions, disclose changes, and earn public trust through clear answers and enforceable commitments.

    53 min
  • #107 Blind Loyalty: When Parties Betray Their Base

    In this episode of Truthful Manipulation, hosts Dave Kelsey and H. Daniel Mujahid investigate whether Republicans or Democrats have done more harm to their own constituents by comparing party promises to real-world outcomes.

    They explore examples like rural health care, farm policy, housing affordability, cultural messaging, and political identity, concluding that both parties can fail their supporters when loyalty replaces accountability, and urging listeners to track promises and demand results.

    38 min
  • #106 What Do You Do When No One's Watching? Integrity Tested

    Hosts Dave Kelsey and H. Daniel Mujahid explore what character looks like when there’s no audience, using everyday moral tests—like returning a shopping cart, accidental overchange, workplace credit-stealing, online anonymity, and power dynamics—to probe the difference between reputation and true integrity.

    With sharp humor, parody ads, and practical questions for self-examination, the episode argues that integrity is self-enforced: owning mistakes, keeping promises, and doing good even when no one will know.

    36 min
  • #105 My Side Good, Your Side Bad

    Hosts Dave Kelsey and H. Daniel Mujahid examine tribalism, confirmation bias, motivated reasoning, and how technology and social media amplify our tendency to defend our side and condemn the other.

    Using examples from politics, sports, family, and business, they show how identical behavior is judged differently depending on who does it and offer a practical test: pause, ask if you'd judge your own side the same way, check your evidence, and consider what would change your mind.

    The episode challenges listeners to catch their own hypocrisy, apply the same standards to everyone, and make principles matter even when they are costly.

    38 min

About The Truthfulmanipulation Podcast

From the publisher's feed

Seeing the Lie. Understanding the Game. Choosing Integrity Anyway.