
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, we delve into a profound theological inquiry regarding the limits of visual Christology and the discomfort many feel when the "Incarnate Word" is rendered on a screen. While modern productions like The Chosen are celebrated for their artistic quality, do they risk collapsing the mysterium tremendum of the God-Man into a manageable, relatable, and ultimately anthropocentric figure?.
We explore the doctrine of the hypostatic union—the confession that Jesus is truly God and truly man—and why the medium of film struggles to maintain the "apophatic space" or "unknowing" that Scripture deliberately protects,. From the ontological incapacity of the camera lens to capture divinity to the "Reformed instinct" regarding the Second Commandment, we discuss how the "epistemology of sight" might be replacing the biblical "epistemology of the Word",,.
Key Topics Covered:
• Psychological Realism vs. Transcendental Style: Why film demands a "unifying psychological centre" that the Gospels do not provide,.
• The Problem of "Modern Midrash": How filling in narrative gaps with invented backstories—like Peter’s family life or the theodicy of "Little James"—can distort the theological intent of the Gospels,.
• Kenosis by Camera: Does humanising Jesus through "buddy" banter and relatability strip away his divine sovereignty and holiness?,.
• The Medium is the Metaphor: Drawing on Neil Postman, we ask if the Gospel can survive a shift into a medium designed for entertainment and emotional gratification,.
Join us as we discuss why the tension between the natures of Christ is not a problem for scriptwriters to solve, but an altar for worship
By Ajay DaramIn this episode, we delve into a profound theological inquiry regarding the limits of visual Christology and the discomfort many feel when the "Incarnate Word" is rendered on a screen. While modern productions like The Chosen are celebrated for their artistic quality, do they risk collapsing the mysterium tremendum of the God-Man into a manageable, relatable, and ultimately anthropocentric figure?.
We explore the doctrine of the hypostatic union—the confession that Jesus is truly God and truly man—and why the medium of film struggles to maintain the "apophatic space" or "unknowing" that Scripture deliberately protects,. From the ontological incapacity of the camera lens to capture divinity to the "Reformed instinct" regarding the Second Commandment, we discuss how the "epistemology of sight" might be replacing the biblical "epistemology of the Word",,.
Key Topics Covered:
• Psychological Realism vs. Transcendental Style: Why film demands a "unifying psychological centre" that the Gospels do not provide,.
• The Problem of "Modern Midrash": How filling in narrative gaps with invented backstories—like Peter’s family life or the theodicy of "Little James"—can distort the theological intent of the Gospels,.
• Kenosis by Camera: Does humanising Jesus through "buddy" banter and relatability strip away his divine sovereignty and holiness?,.
• The Medium is the Metaphor: Drawing on Neil Postman, we ask if the Gospel can survive a shift into a medium designed for entertainment and emotional gratification,.
Join us as we discuss why the tension between the natures of Christ is not a problem for scriptwriters to solve, but an altar for worship