The source for the very fundamental requirement of shefichas shirayim with korbanos other than chattas turns up tangentially in our unrelated sugya and will never be revisited.

The existential question of whether or not Pesach and Ma'aser are even korbanos is buried in a conceptually unrelated sugya in the "wrong" Perek.

A seemingly innocuous passuk in Re'eh turns out to harbor deep halachic secrets.

Taking note of the revolution set out by our Mishnah about the minimum number of matanos necessary to be mechaper.

Understanding how the last Mishnah in the perek relates to the structure and direction of the rest of the chapter.

Understanding why the discussion of the minimum required matanos hadam finds its way into the middle of our treatment of hilchos Piggul.

Another stunning example of the Chafetz Chaim's insistence on reuniting fragmented sugyos into a single edifice.

Fundamental aspects of eating Kodashim while Tamei find themselves on our daf for purely technical reasons.

An application of piggul finds itself in the post-piggul part of the perek for purely technical reasons.

The source of the time period within which chattas, asham and other korbanos must be eaten, is cited here, out of context, and nowhere else in Shas.