The provided source is a bill analysis of California Assembly Bill No. 369 (AB 369), detailing its pros, cons, and future implications. It examines how AB 369 grants legal immunity to unlicensed individuals who administer anti-seizure rescue medication during emergencies, aiming to encourage bystander intervention. While the bill seeks to improve patient outcomes by reducing fear of liability, the analysis also highlights significant concerns, such as the absence of mandatory training requirements, the potential for misinterpretation of key terms, and the lack of guidance on medication sourcing and dosage. The document further discusses indirect financial impacts, including potential savings from reduced emergency calls versus increased healthcare costs due to complications, concluding that while well-intentioned, the bill presents substantial practical and legal challenges due to its broad immunity without commensurate safeguards.