In Episode 11 of the Water Lobby podcast, we talk with Matt Paneitz, a former Austinite and founder of the nonprofit Long Way Home, who has spent the last two decades in Guatemala pioneering a revolutionary approach to infrastructure, education, and community-building.

What starts as a conversation about building with trash (yes, trash) quickly evolves into a powerful blueprint for solving systemic poverty, not just with sustainable materials, but with a new model for education.

Here are the key takeaways from our conversation.

1. Solving Two Problems at Once

When Matt first moved to Guatemala in 2002 as a Peace Corps volunteer, he was struck by two major problems:

* A Waste Crisis: With no formal trash removal system, waste was either burned, buried, or thrown into ravines.

* An Infrastructure Need: A significant portion of the population lived in poverty, lacking basic infrastructure like safe housing, clinics, and schools.

In 2004, he founded Long Way Home to tackle both problems at once. The big idea: What if you could use the community’s waste as a building material to create the infrastructure it desperately needed?

2. Why Build with Tires?

Our host asked the obvious question: Why not use conventional materials like bricks or wood?

Matt explained that in Guatemala, conventional materials aren’t just expensive; they’re often not the best tool for the job. Cinder blocks, for example, don’t insulate well and perform poorly in earthquakes.

This led them to an unconventional solution: used car tires.

“If you lay a tire flat, you fill it with dirt, you hit it with a sledgehammer, you basically are creating an c that is surrounded by rubber... it’s never going to decompose.”

The benefits are massive:

* Earthquake-Resistant: Unlike rigid structures tied to a footer, these tire walls sit above ground and “move along with the earthquake rather than resisting the earthquake.” This is critical in a region that remembers the devastating 1976 earthquake.

* Thermal Insulation: The thick, earth-packed walls create a “cave-like” effect, maintaining a constant, comfortable temperature year-round without heating or A/C.

* Job Creation: The model is labor-intensive by design. It replaces the high cost of materials (like cement) with paid jobs for local community members.

* Waste Reduction: It removes thousands of tires from local ravines and rivers.

And for those wondering what it looks like? The “trash” is completely hidden. “When you tell anybody locally... ‘we’re going to build a building out of tires,’ they look at you like you’re crazy,” Matt admits. “But... we plaster them with lime plaster... When they see it, they say it’s one of the most beautiful things I’ve ever seen.”

3. The Real Mission: Education as a Laboratory

The innovative construction earned Long Way Home recognition from UNESCO, but the buildings themselves aren’t the final product. The true mission is education.

Long Way Home runs a primary, middle, and high school where the community itself becomes the laboratory.

“Instead of doing somewhat abstract math... the students in our seventh grade could apply their math to build ventilated stoves... The same thing happens in social studies class. Rather than... doing some abstract survey... they go from house to house and figure out what the local living conditions are like.”

This hands-on approach gives students a direct role in the sustainable development of their own community. They build water tanks, compost latrines, retaining walls, and clinics, all while fulfilling their national curriculum requirements. The result is a generation of graduates who enter university or the workforce—as nurses, lawyers, engineers, or architects—with a deep, practical understanding of sustainable design and community-led problem-solving.

4. The Next 20 Years: A Plan to Scale

After 20 years of proving the concept, Matt says Long Way Home is now entering its scaling phase. But they’re not planning to build more schools themselves.

Their new goal is to give their model away.

They are finalizing a complete set of lesson plans that integrate this hands-on, community-building approach directly into the public school curriculum.

“We’re going to put our education model in the hands of public schools and say, ‘Let’s solve extreme poverty... and let’s also improve the quality of education.’... What politician’s gonna go, ‘You know what? I think that I’m not gonna put that on my ballot.’? ... This is not progressive, it’s not conservative. It is human dignity.”

By providing these lesson plans to public school teachers—who are often under-resourced and lacking materials—Long Way Home has created a “win-win-win” situation that can scale rapidly without a massive budget.

5. A Challenge to Us All

This is more than just a feel-good story from Central America; it’s a proven, scalable model that challenges how we think about solving our own problems, from homelessness in Austin to infrastructure needs across the U.S.

As Matt put it in his closing remarks, this is a headline in the making.

“To your listeners, donate. And then as soon as you donate, then keep your eyes peeled for the New York Times headlines where it says, ‘Guatemala school ends poverty. The first time it’s happened in the world and 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th graders were responsible for it.’... We’re going to do it.”

If you’re inspired by Matt’s vision, you can get involved. To see incredible photos of the sustainable buildings, school, and community, visit lwhome.org/media. For more detailed information on their green building techniques and educational curriculum, check out lwhomegreen.org.

And to help their team make that future New York Times headline a reality, please consider making a donation to support their work in ending poverty through education and sustainable design.

A conversation between Sanjay and Eduardo on the complex water challenges facing Texas, from the parched reservoirs of the coast to the hidden drought beneath Austin’s feet.

As the Texas summer heat finally gives way to the crisp promise of autumn, the conversation naturally turns to change. For us, it’s a time of professional growth—shifting from water resources modeling to the hands-on, under-the-bridge perspective of structural inspections. It’s this change in perspective that frames our latest discussion on a topic that affects every Texan: water.

While we celebrate the milder weather, two starkly different water crises are unfolding in our state, revealing that the challenges we face are far more complex than just waiting for the next rainstorm.

The Crisis in Mathis: When the Lake Runs Dry

Our focus first turned to Mathis, Texas, a small town of about 4,000 people near Lake Corpus Christi. The situation is dire. The lake, which supplies water to the region, is only 15% full. As a result, Mathis is on the verge of running out of water.

This is a heartbreaking and deeply concerning scenario. How can a town so close to a major reservoir face such a threat? The problem is a tangled web of infrastructure, industry, and water rights. The City of Corpus Christi manages the lake and likely holds priority water rights, while local industries and farms also draw heavily from the dwindling supply.

This isn’t just a resource problem; it’s an infrastructure and equity problem. As Eduardo noted, smaller communities are often at the mercy of larger entities. The immediate solutions are clear but difficult: impose water restrictions, secure emergency funding from the Texas Water Development Board, and create a rapid response plan. The town is planning to drill new wells, but this is a reactive measure to a crisis that has been building for years.

The Paradox in Austin: Full Lakes, Empty Aquifers

In stark contrast, here in Austin, the recent rains have left Lake Travis 85% full. Flooding was a concern just a few months ago. Yet, the Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Authority has just declared an “exceptional drought” and is calling for water usage reductions of up to 100% for some permit holders starting October 1st.

How can this be? It’s a critical lesson in hydrology: surface water and groundwater are not the same thing. While our lakes are brimming, the groundwater that so many in the Hill Country depend on is at a 30-year low.

This disconnect highlights a systemic failure. We are great at managing the water we can see but have neglected the invisible, vital resource beneath our feet. Austin is exploring a $1.5 billion Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) project to inject water into the ground for later use. It’s a step in the right direction, but it feels like a belated solution to a problem that required proactive planning years ago.

Desalination: The Billion-Dollar Boogeyman or Our Best Hope?

When a region is flanked by the Gulf of America, the conversation inevitably turns to desalination. With the cost of solar energy plummeting, the biggest historical barrier to desalination—exorbitant energy costs—is rapidly disappearing. So why aren’t we building more desal plants?

The answer is a combination of political pushback and public perception. Critics often point to the high price tag, citing projects that cost half a billion dollars for what seems like a small return. But in an economy where individuals have net worths in the hundreds of billions, is a billion-dollar investment to secure water for thousands of people truly too much?

Furthermore, we’re overlooking a key innovation: the “waste” from desalination, a salty brine, is actually a valuable asset. Private companies are already figuring out how to profitably extract lithium and other critical minerals from this brine. Why aren’t our public utilities being empowered to do the same, turning an expense into a revenue stream? The bottleneck isn’t technology; it’s the political will to make bold, necessary investments.

It’s Not You, It’s the System

Ultimately, both crises point to a flawed narrative. For decades, the burden of conservation has been placed on individuals. We’re told to take shorter showers and let our lawns go brown, while systemic issues go unaddressed.

* Leaky Pipes: Many municipal systems lose up to 50% of their water to leaks before it ever reaches a tap.

* “Use It or Lose It” Policies: Archaic water rights laws force agricultural users to pump their full allocation of water, even if they don’t need it, just to avoid losing that right in the future.

* Misaligned Priorities: We debate a billion-dollar water project while approving multi-billion dollar expenditures elsewhere without question. We have the talent and resources to solve these problems; we just haven’t made it a national priority.

Water should be a unifying issue. Conservatives and liberals alike value conservation, stewardship, and sustainability. Voters consistently approve water infrastructure bonds when they appear on the ballot. The breakdown isn’t with the people; it’s in the halls of power where the urgency of our water future has yet to truly sink in. This is a people problem not because people are the cause, but because people are the solution. We must find the leadership—and demand the accountability—to secure our most precious resource.

This past month has been a difficult one for Central Texas, especially for those in Travis and Kerr Counties. As residents grieve and begin to rebuild after devastating floods, a different kind of storm is brewing: the ongoing conflict over water rights. While our community comes together to help one another, the political and corporate battles for Texas's most precious resource continue behind the scenes.

The Great Texas Water Grab: Who's Behind the Curtain?

As the Texas population explodes, so does the demand for water. People in San Antonio don't want Austin taking their water, and Austin residents get nervous when they see growth in Round Rock that depends on Lake Travis. But a recent story out of East Texas highlights a new chapter in these water wars.

Two companies, Pine Bliss and Redtown Ranch (LLCs whose ownership is opaque), are seeking to install 40 high-capacity wells across Anderson, Henderson, and Houston counties. Their request? To withdraw an astonishing 15-16 billion gallons of water per year from the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer. This is a staggering amount that raises concerns about the sustainability of our groundwater, especially when taxpayers are burdened with the cost of refilling aquifers through methods like Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR).

This alarming situation is further complicated by a potential conflict of interest. Individuals involved in managing the local Groundwater Conservation District (GCD) are reportedly the same people who are benefiting from these large-scale water licenses. It's a painful reality that brings to mind the documentary "Kern Water Bank," which exposed backroom deals that essentially privatized California's underground water. While East Texas residents have come together to protest this, the battle is far from over.

LNRA Dam Project and the Fight for the Rivers

The corporate push for water isn't limited to groundwater. The Lavaca-Navidad River Authority (LNRA) is planning a major dam project on the Lavaca River. This dam would divert an estimated 30 billion gallons of water per year, an undertaking with significant environmental consequences. Dam construction is notoriously complex, with concerns ranging from the destruction of river ecology to the death of fish populations that rely on natural upstream migration. While there are engineering solutions like fish ladders, agencies often have to cut corners to stay on budget and timeline. The LNRA project is facing public scrutiny, particularly as it may not require a federal environmental impact analysis, potentially fast-tracking a project that could permanently alter the river's ecosystem.

Flooding and Fees: Disaster as a Tax Opportunity?

As if a natural disaster wasn't enough, some counties are leveraging their disaster declaration powers to raise taxes. In both Kerr and Travis counties, officials are considering tax increases of up to 22%, a significant jump from the typical 5-10% limit. While these funds are meant for emergency services and infrastructure repairs, the timing feels like a betrayal to many. People who have lost homes and jobs are now facing a heavier financial burden.

This happens while community members and local companies like H-E-B are donating millions of dollars and thousands of volunteer hours to the recovery effort. The contradiction is clear: Why is the burden being placed on the community's most vulnerable when non-profits are receiving millions, and corporations are being granted massive water rights? This is a moment where leaders should be offering tax relief, not tax increases.

The Future of Water Management: A Political, Not Technical, Problem

These issues point to a larger problem in how Texas manages its water. It's not a lack of engineering solutions; we have the technology to build fish ladders on dams and monitor river levels. The problem is one of political will and leadership.

The current system is a complex web of agencies—Groundwater Conservation Districts (GCDs), Groundwater Management Areas (GMAs), the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB), and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)—all with overlapping responsibilities. It is a system that allows for conflict of interest and backroom deals. The recent floods and ongoing water debates demand a new approach. We must move beyond "me versus them" and focus on our shared responsibility to protect and manage our water resources for the long term. This means supporting leaders who prioritize resilient infrastructure, fair resource distribution, and proactive conservation over short-sighted gains.

What are your thoughts on this? Should corporations be allowed to take such large amounts of water? Is it right for counties to raise taxes on residents after a disaster? Share your opinions in the comments below.

Hello, Water Lobby listeners! In this information-heavy Episode 8, Eduardo and Sanjay dive deep into critical conversations surrounding floodplain management, emergency preparedness, and the recent Kerr County flooding event. With July 13th marking a somber reminder of past tragedies, this episode tackles the complex interplay of natural phenomena, engineering decisions, and community response.

The Kerr County Tragedy: A Call for Accountability in Floodplain Delineation 🗺️

The recent journalistic uncovering of buildings removed from the Cypress Creek floodplain in Kerr County, Texas, a decade ago (around 2011-2013), has ignited a crucial discussion about responsibility and communication of flood risk. Sanjay, a professional in floodplain services, highlights how such events often lead to "finger-pointing" among state, local, and national agencies.

He emphasizes that while it's challenging to keep up with all risks, the science behind predicting major weather events like El Niño years is well-established. These cycles, occurring every two to seven years, lead to heavy rainfall and amplified hurricanes. As Sanjay notes, "You cannot just say that, hey, we didn't know that it was coming. I think that's not an acceptable answer."

The discussion zeroes in on the Camp Mystic site, located on a meandering river, and the complexities of FEMA flood studies. These studies often don't fully account for dynamic river behavior, dam storage changes due to sediment buildup, or the meandering nature of rivers over time. City programs like Austin's "erosion zone" initiative are attempting to address these nuances by requiring engineers to analyze river meandering for development.

Eduardo and Sanjay both stress the importance of engineers stepping up and taking accountability. As Sanjay puts it, "This is one of the times where us as engineers, we have to come step up and take accountability." He recalls the origin of the professional engineering license in Texas, born from a school fire tragedy, underscoring the profound responsibility engineers hold in ensuring public safety.

Water as a Resource: Drought Recovery and Rising Rates 💧

Amidst the discussion of flood tragedies, Eduardo shifts the conversation to the brighter side: water as a vital resource. Following significant rainfall, Texas lakes have seen a notable increase in water levels. Dr. Mace's data, shared by Sanjay, indicates:

* Lake Buchanan: 85.5% full and rising.

* Lake Travis: 70% full.

* Canyon Lake: 64% full.

* Medina Lake: More than doubled its storage, now at 5.2% full (compared to 2.3% a month ago).

While this provides a much-needed recovery from the severe drought Central Texas has experienced, the conversation quickly turns to the perplexing issue of rising water rates. Private water companies like County Line Water and Aqua Texas have reportedly doubled their rates, with some customers seeing bills of $600 for a single month's water usage.

This drastic increase raises questions about the transparency and regulation of the water industry. Sanjay expresses his suspicion, arguing that doubling rates within a year "shouldn't be allowed." This leads to a deeper philosophical discussion about water as a basic human right versus a commodity, and the potential for "non-profit industrial complex" to absorb disaster funding.

Community Resilience and the Power of Local Leadership 💪

Despite the challenges, the spirit of Texas communities shines through. Sanjay highlights the heartwarming and rapid community response to the Kerr County flooding, with local businesses and individuals rallying to provide support. He praises initiatives like P. Terry's Burger Stand raising millions for flood relief and HEB deploying disaster relief trucks within hours of the event.

The conversation ultimately underscores the importance of local engagement. Eduardo and Sanjay encourage listeners to prioritize involvement in local mayoral races and connect with their city council members. As Eduardo aptly states, "People love the president role... but they live in New York. They have their own family problems over there. They don't even have drainage systems like we do over here. They don't know how flooding works. It's New York. We're in Texas. We're better."

They extend an open invitation to those in positions of power – judges, council members, and decision-makers in water management – to join the Water Lobby podcast and foster crucial dialogue. The episode concludes with a fascinating anecdote about the superior drainage infrastructure in Bogota, Colombia, and the idea of a "water blog" to document and share insights on global water management solutions.

What are your thoughts on flood risk, accountability, and the rising cost of water? Share your comments below!

Welcome to the seventh episode of the Water Lobby podcast. This week, we're tackling the big money flowing into Texas water infrastructure, the disruptive potential of artificial intelligence, and what it all means for your monthly water bill.

A Drop in the Bucket: The Texas Water Fund's $2.5 Billion Renewal

The Texas Water Fund has been renewed, growing from an initial $1 billion to $2.5 billion for this year, with an additional $1 billion slated for each following year. This funding, sourced from sales tax, is a significant investment, with a 50/50 split between developing new water sources and repairing existing, aging infrastructure.

But as we discussed, is this enough? The state identified an $80 billion need for water infrastructure projects. While $2.5 billion is a start, it feels like a drop in the bucket.

A critical point of contention is the funding mechanism itself: sales tax. Is this the most equitable and sustainable way to fund long-term infrastructure needs? As our infrastructure continues to age, the financial burden will shift from new construction to ongoing operations and maintenance.

This is where the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) steps in, acting as the construction manager for these funds. They'll be reviewing applications from cities across the state, determining project scopes, and allocating resources. However, the planning cycles for water and flood management have historically missed crucial factors like the skyrocketing water demands of data centers and the recent population boom in Texas, not to mention the unforeseen impact of the AI revolution.

The Human Element in a World of Contracts and Scope Creep

In our experience with construction and design, project budgets are often plagued by "scope creep." You begin with a defined scope of services, but unforeseen issues inevitably arise. You start an excavation and discover that the ground itself needs repair. This is where the rigidity of contracts can clash with the reality of the work.

Strong project management is essential to navigate these challenges. We need a system that allows for a phased approach, allocating funds to projects and rewarding those that demonstrate success. It’s not just about the money; it's about building trust and fostering strong relationships between contractors and owners to navigate the unexpected.

This raises a crucial question: Do our listeners know how to get involved and track how these funds are being used in their own cities? The journey of a water project, from legislative funding to water flowing from your tap, is a long and complex one, often spanning 10 to 20 years.

Can AI Save Us from Our Aging Infrastructure?

While the Texas Water Fund may not be the silver bullet, we're optimistic about the role of human ingenuity and technology, particularly artificial intelligence.

Historically, solving a minor problem in a water system required bringing in a subject matter expert. Today, AI-powered chatbots can provide instant access to a vast repository of knowledge. A city manager or a water superintendent can now ask complex questions and receive immediate, actionable strategies. This democratization of information could be a game-changer, especially for smaller communities.

Consider a small city with a population of a few hundred and a staff of just four people. The intricate process of applying for and managing grants from the Texas Water Fund might be overwhelming. For these communities, the ability to leverage AI to make faster, more informed decisions could be transformative. It levels the playing field, giving them access to the same analytical power as a metropolis with a multi-billion dollar budget.

We're already seeing large cities procuring AI-based software for tasks like email writing. While some of these expenditures may seem wasteful, especially when powerful AI tools are available for free, it highlights the broader trend of integrating AI into governance.

This leads to a fascinating and perhaps controversial idea: could a city have its own legal AI? A company called Crosby Legal is already exploring this, offering AI-driven legal services with a "human in the loop" to ensure oversight. Imagine a future where AI agents, representing cities and corporations, can negotiate and execute contracts, streamlining a process that is often fraught with delays and disputes.

The Double-Edged Sword of Technological Advancement

Of course, the rise of AI is not without its challenges. There are valid concerns about over-reliance on technology and the potential for dehumanization. As a designer, the idea of using AI to manage a large volume of clients feels impersonal. The most meaningful professional relationships are built on genuine, human connection.

However, the potential for AI to enhance productivity in the construction industry is undeniable. We could soon see major infrastructure projects, like the I-35 expansion, completed on budget and on schedule—a prospect that currently seems almost fantastical. This efficiency gain stems from empowering the younger generation of engineers. Armed with AI, a recent graduate can now ask the "stupid questions" they might have been hesitant to pose to a senior colleague, fostering a more rapid and effective learning process.

The broader societal implications are also profound. Historically, technological shifts have led to job displacement. From the sewing machine to the computer, each wave of innovation has rendered certain skills obsolete. This time, however, feels different. The increasing abundance in our world, coupled with the time freed up by AI-driven productivity, could allow people to pursue more purpose-driven lives. We're already seeing a shift away from traditional career paths towards creative and fulfilling pursuits like farming, podcasting, and art.

This technological leap is also reshaping geopolitics. The race for AI dominance has been framed as the new nuclear arms race. The United States is exporting the idea that if you don't invest in AI, you will be left behind. This has created a massive market for data centers and specialized hardware, with significant geopolitical implications.

The Looming Crisis: Unaffordable Water Bills

As we look to the future, a more immediate concern is the rising cost of water. In our communities, we're seeing water utility rates skyrocket, in some cases by 100%. Investor-owned utilities are leading this charge, and we fear that public utilities will soon follow suit, citing the new market standard.

This trend is not unique to Texas. In London, the high rates charged by the investor-owned Thames Water have led to people losing their water connections. This is the dark side of treating a fundamental human right as a commodity.

Furthermore, the rollout of smart water meters is raising questions. Some residents are reporting water usage figures of 30,000 gallons a month—a staggering amount that suggests potential inaccuracies in the new technology. These are not conspiracy theories; they are real concerns backed by screenshots of exorbitant water bills.

We are at a critical juncture. The decisions we make today about how we fund our infrastructure, embrace new technologies, and regulate our utilities will have a lasting impact on the affordability and accessibility of water for generations to come.

Join us for our next episode as we take a deeper dive into the rising water utility rates in Central Texas and explore what you can do to protest and protect your access to this essential resource.

Welcome to the companion blog for the Water Lobby podcast! In our sixth episode, recorded on May 11th, hosts Sanjay and Eduardo dived deep into some of the most pressing and often overlooked issues at the intersection of water, technology, and global security. From the insatiable thirst of data centers in our backyards to the alarming use of water as a weapon in international conflicts, the conversation highlighted the critical need for awareness and action.

The Hidden Water Footprint of Our Digital World

Sanjay kicked off a crucial discussion on the booming data center industry, particularly in Texas, which is already home to over 300 such facilities with more on the way. While these digital powerhouses fuel our modern lives, they come with a significant and often hidden cost: water.

Why So Thirsty? Eduardo, like many, was surprised to learn the sheer scale of water consumption. Data centers, packed with tens of thousands, even millions, of heat-generating GPUs, require massive amounts of water for cooling. Sanjay explained, "As soon as [water] actually touches some of these coils, it just vaporizes. There's so much heat that we're talking about."

Key Concerns Raised:

* Environmental Impact:

* Location: Data centers are often strategically built near rivers or creeks for easy water intake and discharge. This valuable land, often preferred by homeowners for its natural beauty, is increasingly occupied by these industrial facilities.

* Ecological Disruption: Discharging warm water back into creeks can severely disrupt the local ecological balance, potentially "killing everything," as Eduardo starkly put it.

* Pollution: Concerns exist about potential pollutants from lithium discharge or other materials used in the facilities.

* Transformation of Landscapes: Lush green areas, often in floodplains, are converted into impervious, "dirty" areas, leading to dust and light pollution.

* Socio-Economic Impact:

* The Homeowner's Plight: Residents who bought homes anticipating serene environments find themselves living next to noisy, massive construction sites that later become sources of constant operational hum and light.

* Economic Windfall vs. Ratepayer Burden: While data centers bring construction jobs and significant tax revenue (a Samsung facility near Austin, for example, is valued at over $6 billion, dwarfing the entire value of a neighboring city), they also strain local water and wastewater infrastructure.

* Rising Utility Costs: Cities must invest billions to upgrade infrastructure to meet the demands of data centers. These costs are often passed directly to ratepayers. Sanjay warned, "If you're paying or used to pay like $100 a month, you could be paying up to $400, $500 a month just for your water, just for your energy."

* Permitting Disparities: Sanjay highlighted a frustrating reality: "People who want to build a single-family home...it will take them around two to three years to get their permits, but a data center permit is getting published in six months or less. So that says a lot about our priorities."

Eduardo, a water resources engineer himself, emphasized the challenge: "The tools that we as individual engineers are given are limited... The issue that you're talking about is inter-jurisdictional... and capitalism will never fund inter-jurisdictional work." He pointed out the need to "engulf new problems like this one... before it blows up" by bringing together diverse professionals, a task made difficult by systemic silos.

Water as a Weapon: A Disturbing Global Reality

The conversation took a somber turn as Sanjay introduced the weaponization of water, citing the recent tensions between India and Pakistan concerning the Indus Waters Treaty.

Key Points:

* Treaties Under Threat: India's reported statement about not acknowledging the treaty sent shockwaves, as this agreement governs the water distribution crucial for both nations.

* Targeting Lifelines: The discussion touched upon the terrifying prospect of water infrastructure, like dams, becoming military targets. The consequences would be catastrophic, affecting downstream populations, agriculture, and overall water supply.

* The Human Cost: Eduardo reacted emotionally, describing water as "a religious type of liquid... a gift." He stated, "To hear that people actually make missiles to kill the storage units that we use to save lives is downright evil... it's unforgivable behavior."

* Food Security at Risk: Sanjay underscored the extreme vulnerability of agricultural systems. Pakistan, for instance, relies on Indus water for about 70% of its agriculture. Disrupting this supply, even for a week, could lead to crop failure and a devastating food crisis, especially in countries running on lean food reserves (potentially a "two-week supply" for Pakistan). He urged, "We just hope that people who are in charge tread carefully... and just consider the lives that are at stake."

The hosts connected this to a "panoply of conflict" worldwide, from Ukraine to Israel-Gaza, and even the US-Mexico water delivery disputes, emphasizing that attacking natural resources is a form of warfare with devastating, widespread consequences.

Eroding Foundations: Attacks on Knowledge and Infrastructure

The podcast also touched upon a more insidious form of destruction: the erosion of knowledge and public infrastructure, often driven by budget cuts and shifting political agendas.

* Loss of Expertise: Sanjay mentioned the concerning news about the Federal Highway Resource Center, where the individual responsible for critical hydraulic modeling manuals was reportedly let go. This symbolizes a broader "library burning" where valuable institutional knowledge is lost.

* "Self-Imposed Austerity": Eduardo lamented how budget cuts and a culture of austerity hinder the ability to proactively address problems. He noted the irony of using advanced data centers for complex simulations while simultaneously dismantling the foundational knowledge systems and funding that support such work.

* Impact on Public Services: The discussion highlighted how agencies like FEMA and NOAA are also facing pressures, potentially impacting their ability to serve the public and manage critical resources. Even voicing opinions within these agencies can carry risks for employees.

Sanjay shared a personal anecdote about receiving a $50 parking ticket in Austin due to a non-functional payment machine, a small but frustrating example of how city services can falter, and how financial burdens are often shifted to residents.

Looking Ahead: The Water Lobby's Mission

Despite the weighty topics, the episode concluded on a note of purpose. The Water Lobby podcast aims to raise awareness and foster a community dedicated to water conservation and advocacy.

Sanjay and Eduardo discussed plans to:

* Grow the community: Engage more listeners and viewers.

* Bring in Experts: Feature guests from the industry to share diverse perspectives.

* Organize Meetups: Connect with listeners, starting in Central Texas.

* Advocate for Change: Mobilize listeners for events like Texas Water Day at the Capitol, encouraging direct engagement with legislators to champion responsible water management and funding.

Eduardo concluded, "The more Texans...learn about Texan water, the more they will be invested in protecting it, in enjoying it... This water lobby is already in a stage where I'm very, very happy with our work."

The challenges are immense, from managing the thirst of our digital infrastructure to confronting the weaponization of our most vital resource. But as the Water Lobby podcast underscores, awareness, dialogue, and collective action are our most powerful tools in navigating these turbulent waters.

Stay tuned for more insights and discussions from the Water Lobby!

Welcome back to the Water Lobby Podcast! This is Episode 5, and we switched things up, recording on a Saturday evening (April 12th, 2025) instead of our usual morning slot.

After catching up on our days – Sanjay hitting a 5K, grabbing tacos, and getting some sun paddleboarding on Lady Bird Lake, and Eduardo tackling gardening and building shed doors – we dove into some pressing topics circulating in the water world.

FEMA's BRIC Program Axed: A Necessary Cut or a Loss for Resilience?

The big news shaking the industry recently was FEMA's decision to cancel the Building Resilience in Communities (BRIC) grant program. Officially framed as ending a "wasteful, politicized grant program," this move has sparked considerable debate.

Sanjay's Take: While acknowledging the program wasn't perfect and faced criticism, many felt it was heading towards stability. The BRIC program commanded significant funding – growing from $500 million in 2020 to nearly $2.3 billion in 2022, before settling back to $1 billion in 2023. However, a key point of contention has been the high management costs (peaking near $300 million in 2022). These funds often went to large consulting firms, some arguably outside their core expertise (like accounting firms managing resilience projects), raising questions about value and efficiency. There were also concerns that funding disproportionately favored larger urban centers over smaller, rural communities. Was the program poorly run from the start, making it an easy target for cuts, even if the goal of community resilience is vital?

Eduardo's Take: From a Texas perspective, federal relationships are always complex. While emergency disaster funds (like for Hurricane Harvey recovery) flow more directly, programs like BRIC often involve layers of bureaucracy and studies that might feel wasteful. Slashing funding for reports and travel might seem logical, but is it targeted correctly? The definition of "infrastructure" itself is debated (is a hospital infrastructure?). While disaster recovery (fixing roads, levees, rescuing people) needs funding, perhaps the "waste" was more in the administrative overhead and consultant studies than in tangible resilience efforts. We need to focus on real infrastructure needs without getting lost in political maneuvering.

Ultimately, both hosts agreed that communities impacted by disasters need direct resources and support, leveraging local knowledge and addressing trauma, rather than just another PowerPoint presentation from external consultants.

The US-Mexico Water Treaty: A Looming Deadline and Cross-Border Tensions

Another critical issue gaining national attention involves the 1944 Water Treaty between the US and Mexico. Mexico is obligated to deliver 1.75 million acre-feet of water over a five-year cycle, but they are currently behind schedule, facing a deficit as the October 25, 2025 deadline approaches.

Sanjay's Perspective: This isn't just a numbers game; it impacts vital agricultural sectors on both sides of the border. Texas relies heavily on produce from Mexico (think HEB avocados!), and Mexico's own agricultural industry is struggling due to drought and infrastructure challenges, forcing some workers to migrate. While the federal government is involved, this requires sensitive, bilateral negotiation. We receive the products of Mexico's water use (food), even if the water delivery itself is lagging. Is simply demanding the water without considering the context the right approach? Furthermore, could Texas invest more in its own solutions, like desalination of abundant brackish groundwater, reducing reliance on treaty deliveries?

Eduardo's Perspective: The 1944 treaty is old. Water scarcity is a huge scientific challenge. How do we even accurately measure water, especially complex groundwater systems? The science is arguably as complex as rocket science, yet the political negotiations might lack that technical depth. Is the current political rhetoric around this issue truly about water scarcity, or is it a hijacking of popular sentiment, similar to debates around FEMA funding? Perhaps the focus should be less on scarcity (Eduardo believes there's enough water, it's just not distributed equitably) and more on efficient management, fixing waste (like leaky pipes losing 40-50% of transmitted water), and avoiding the politicization of essential resources.

(For deeper dives, Sanjay recommended checking out Dr. Rosario Sanchez's work at Texas A&M on transboundary aquifers and engaging with TCEQ).

Water Conservation, Shower Pressure, and Infrastructure Grades

Connecting to resource management, we touched on water conservation efforts.

* Local Initiatives: Austin's Water Forward plans and the "purple pipe" system for reclaimed water show proactive steps.

* Expert Insights: Dr. Robert Mace from the Meadows Center at Texas State is a key voice in conservation (catch him at the ACEWRI meeting in May!).

* The Reality: Conservation measures can have tangible effects – like the low water pressure Dr. Mace joked about experiencing in a LEED-certified apartment. This led to a lighter discussion on shower preferences and the political statement about ending the "war on water pressure."

* The Report Card: The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) released its latest infrastructure report card. While the overall grade improved slightly (thanks, IIJA funding!), Wastewater received a D. This is concerning.

* Eduardo noted this low grade isn't new, and while disheartening, the US might compare poorly to places like the Netherlands or Japan (Sanjay mentioned Japan's massive underground storm drainage). He emphasized that urban centers often have more resources to tackle these issues than rural areas, highlighting a need to support those communities.

* Sanjay pointed out the real-world implications: boil water notices, struggles for rural utilities to meet EPA standards or hire qualified staff (like Class C operators), and the tragedies seen in places like Flint, Michigan, which are sadly not isolated incidents. The challenge of aging infrastructure is compounded by workforce issues.

Looking Ahead: Building Reservoirs and Developing Talent

* Future Supply: The Brazos River Authority is moving forward with the Allen Creek Reservoir project near Houston/Sugar Land – a crucial step given Texas's projected population growth (4.6 million more in the basin by 2080) and the incredibly long timeline for building new reservoirs (often 50+ years from planning to completion).

* Workforce Development: With a significant portion of the water utility workforce nearing retirement (Sanjay cited stats suggesting potentially over 55-60% have less than 10 years' experience), knowledge transfer is critical. Programs like the San Antonio River Authority's initiative bringing students in for hands-on water quality testing are vital for building the next generation of water professionals – whatever their engineering title might be (Civil, Electrical, AI, or even "Human" engineers building communities!).

Join the Conversation!

This was our longest episode yet, packed with discussion! A huge thank you to everyone tuning in and subscribing on Substack and YouTube – we were thrilled to hit 100 views on our last video episode!

We truly appreciate you spending your time with us. Please continue to engage – subscribe, like, comment, and share. What are your thoughts on the FEMA cuts, the Mexico water treaty, or the state of our water infrastructure? Let us know!

Hello fellow water enthusiasts!

Welcome back to another recap of the Water Lobby Podcast. In this episode (the fourth!), Sanjay and Eduardo tackle a packed agenda, covering everything from a potentially game-changing Executive Order impacting FEMA to the highlights of Texas Water Day. They also delve into the broader philosophical implications of ecological systems and how we, as individuals and professionals, can interact with them meaningfully. Grab your reusable water bottle, and let's dive in!

Part 1: The FEMA Shake-Up - "Achieving Efficiency Through State and Local Preparedness"

Sanjay kicks off the discussion with a breakdown of the recent White House Executive Order. This one's a big deal, folks. Here's the gist:

* Initial Relief (and Lingering Questions): The initial reaction was relief that FEMA wasn't being abolished (a widespread fear). However, the order proposes a significant shift towards decentralizing resilience planning. This means more control for state and local governments over NFIP (National Flood Insurance Program) policies.

* The "Risk Register": A key element is the introduction of a "national risk register." This aims to refine flood risk assessment and could lead to updated flood maps and insurance pricing. Sanjay expresses concern about the potential influence of insurance companies in this process, emphasizing the need to prioritize the needs of American citizens over corporate interests.

* Risk Rating 2.0 Revisited: The conversation touches on Risk Rating 2.0, the previous attempt at a technological overhaul of the NFIP. Sanjay points out that while technically advanced, it focused heavily on social equity considerations, potentially overshadowing actual flood depth data. The new risk register might incorporate more of the modeling outputs.

* Eduardo's Critiques: Eduardo offers three sharp critiques of the Executive Order:

* Inconsistency: It aims for a bottom-up approach but is delivered as a top-down directive.

* Lack of Specificity: It doesn't adequately address urban flood risk (a major issue in Texas) and ignores the crucial role of storm sewers.

* Missing Identity: It lacks a clear connection to specific regional needs (like those in Texas) and seems disconnected from other executive orders impacting the workforce needed to implement it.

* The Work done before should not be ignored. It puts to question whether previous risk rating 2.0 was a meaningful use of time.

Part 2: Texas Water Day and a Call for Funding

The conversation shifts to Texas Water Day (March 3rd, 2025), a crucial event for state-level water policy. Key takeaways:

* Budget Surplus Opportunity: Texas has a significant budget surplus (around $20-30 billion). The water community is advocating for a $5 billion one-time investment and a guaranteed $1 billion annual investment in the Texas Water Fund.

* Addressing Multiple Needs: The funding would address various water-related challenges, including:

* Water supply for a growing population.

* Supporting agricultural communities and water rights.

* Managing produced water from oil production.

* Treating brackish water for drinking.

* Navigating regulatory hurdles.

* A Diverse Coalition: Sanjay highlights the diverse representation at the event, including non-profit organizations, policymakers, and engineers, all working towards a common goal.

Part 3: Weather, Lifestyle, and the Ecological Systems Mindset

The final part of the podcast takes a more philosophical turn, exploring the interconnectedness of weather, personal well-being, and our role within ecological systems.

* Weather and Health: Sanjay and Eduardo discuss how weather patterns impact physical and mental health, citing examples of altitude sickness, seasonal affective disorder, and allergy seasons.

* Lifestyle Choices: Eduardo emphasizes the importance of an active lifestyle and finding joy in everyday activities (like his HEB biking adventures!). They agree that both environment (nature) and lifestyle (nurture) shape our emotional state.

* Ecological Systems Construction Engineering: This concept becomes a central theme. Eduardo defines it as understanding the interconnectedness of ecological systems and using engineering knowledge to construct solutions that complement those systems. This requires an interdisciplinary approach, bringing together scientists, engineers, policymakers, and construction managers.

* Nature's Problems: Eduardo challenges the notion that nature is problem-free, highlighting issues like toxicity, erosion, and invasive species (like the zebra mussel, a major concern in Texas). He argues that his work (and Sanjay's) involves identifying and addressing these substantial risks.

* Living in an Ecological Reality: Eduardo describes his perspective as living within an "ecological reality," where the boundaries are more permeable than in other realities (like political or emotional ones). This mindset informs his approach to construction and problem-solving.

Conclusion and Call to Action:

The podcast concludes with a call for continued discussion and suggestions for future topics. Sanjay recommends the YouTube channel "Texas Organic Gardening" for those interested in rainwater harvesting.

This episode provides a valuable snapshot of the complex challenges and opportunities facing the water sector. From federal policy shifts to state-level initiatives and the broader philosophical implications of our relationship with the environment, there's much to consider.

What are your thoughts on the FEMA Executive Order? Do you agree with Eduardo's critiques? What are your biggest concerns about water resources in your region? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

Introduction: Navigating Uncertainty in the Water Sector

Hey, Water Lobby Podcast listeners and fellow water professionals! Eduardo and Sanjay here, back with a critical discussion that's been brewing in our minds (and likely yours, too). It's February 2025, and the water sector is facing a perfect storm of challenges: a new political administration with shifting funding priorities, the rapid rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), and growing anxieties about job security.

This post is based on our recent podcast conversation, where we tackled these complex issues head-on. We'll explore the concerns, the potential impacts, and what leadership should be doing in these uncertain times. We want to hear from you in the comments – are you feeling the same anxieties? What are you seeing in your corner of the industry?

Section 1: The Anxiety of Change – Funding Cuts and Shifting Priorities

One of the biggest sources of anxiety right now is the rapid shift in funding priorities under the new US administration. As Sanjay pointed out in our conversation, this creates a ripple effect:

* Uncertainty for Agencies: Organizations are scrambling to understand the implications for their projects and budgets.

* Lack of Clear Communication: Many engineers are looking to leadership for answers, but often, those leaders are just as lost.

* Questions about Job Security: The most pressing question for many: "Is my job safe?"

Sanjay's experience with co-workers reflects a broader trend: some are deeply engaged with the news, others are trying to learn, and some are seemingly oblivious. This creates a sense of unease, especially when leadership isn't providing clear direction. The concern of funding cuts in EPA and NOAA which deals with climate patterns, and rainfall intensities. The podcast also touches on how the lack of climate data will affect climate, weather, and flood projections.

Quote: "I feel like the leaders are probably just as lost as the rest of us. And that, again, speaks to what actually is leadership, right?" - Eduardo

Section 2: What Should Leadership Be Doing?

This leads us to a crucial question: What is the responsible leadership response in this situation? We believe that true leadership requires:

* Engagement: Actively engaging with the current administration to understand the specific impacts on different sectors (water, wastewater, environment, transportation).

* Advocacy: Standing up for the importance of water and environmental funding, and clearly communicating the needs of the industry and the public.

* Transparency: Openly communicating with their teams about the challenges, potential impacts, and the organization's strategic response.

* Lobby: Lobbying and fighting for the profession.

Sanjay highlighted the lack of visible lobbying from leaders, a critical function in protecting the interests of the water sector.

Quote: "...I'm not seeing that right now where leaders stepping up and saying, hey, this particular science important!" - Sanjay

Section 3: The AI Revolution – Threat or Opportunity?

The conversation then shifted to the elephant in the room: Artificial Intelligence. While AI offers incredible potential for advancements in water management, it also raises serious questions:

* Increased Regulation: Eduardo noted increased regulation on asset management systems, driven by the precision of 2D and 3D modeling (often powered by AI). However, this focus seems to be skewed towards transportation and development, not water conservation.

* The "Black Box" Problem: As AI models become more complex, will engineers lose the ability to understand and challenge their outputs? Will we become mere "users" of a system we don't fully grasp?

* The Wage Gap: Sanjay's point about the vast wage gap between AI engineers and civil engineers is crucial. Will the water sector be able to attract and retain the talent needed to navigate the AI revolution effectively?

* Postmodernism The hosts also discuss how AI could potentially change people's perspective on reality, where physical models are no longer deemed necessary.

Quote: "...our industry as an aggregate does not have the capacity to challenge it [AI] at all... We will be just reduced to a user interface..." - Sanjay

Section 4: Connecting Perception to Reality – A Philosophical Turn

The discussion took a fascinating philosophical turn, exploring the nature of reality and perception, especially in a "post-truth" era. This is directly relevant to the AI debate:

* Whose Truth Matters? When scientific principles are seemingly disregarded by those in power, how do we reconcile differing views of reality?

* The Role of Engineers: Eduardo proposed that engineers are creators of tools for the community, not the value objects themselves. AI is a tool, and we need ethical guidance on how to use it.

* The Value of Traditional Engineering: Our discipline is rooted in physical laws, transparency, and a rigorous methodology. This provides a crucial counterbalance to the potential for AI to be used without proper understanding or critique.

Quote: "...we as engineers, we create tools for the members of our community. We are not the value object. The valuable object is the tool and the knowledge of how to use the tool." - Eduardo

Conclusion: A Call to Action and Engagement

This is a complex and evolving situation. There are no easy answers, but one thing is clear: We need open dialogue, strong leadership, and a commitment to upholding the core values of our profession.

We want to hear from YOU:

* Are you experiencing similar anxieties in your work?

* What are you seeing from leadership (or lack thereof)?

* How do you think AI will impact the water sector in the coming years?

* What steps can we take, individually and collectively, to ensure a sustainable and secure future for water professionals?

Leave a comment below and join the conversation! Let's navigate these challenges together. And be sure to subscribe to the Water Lobby Podcast for more in-depth discussions on the future of water.

Keywords: Water infrastructure, civil engineering jobs, AI in engineering, government funding, EPA, NOAA, climate change data, water resource management, job security, engineering leadership, 2025 political climate, Texas water, infrastructure development, environmental regulations, postmodernism.

Welcome back to the Water Lobby podcast! In our second episode, we explored the diverse economic activities and opportunities within the water sector. From for-profit ventures to volunteer engagement, we discussed various avenues for individuals passionate about water resources, environmental conservation, and ecological advocacy.

Key takeaways from our discussion:

* Water professionals can contribute in numerous ways: Starting a for-profit consulting company is one option, but there's also a world of opportunities in public education, non-profits, and government agencies.

* Networking is crucial: Building connections with like-minded individuals and organizations is essential for professional growth and impact in the water sector.

* The water community is diverse: It encompasses professionals, academics, activists, and volunteers, each with their own motivations and perspectives.

* Water resource management is a capitalistic endeavor: Understanding the economic forces at play is crucial for effective advocacy and conservation efforts.

* Critical thinking and curiosity are essential: Asking the right questions and actively participating in the community are key to making a difference.

Organizations and resources mentioned:

* EWRI (Environmental Water Resources Institute): A subsection of the American Society of Civil Engineers.

* TFMA (Texas Floodplain Managers Association): A chapter of the American Society of Floodplain Managers.

* TSPE (Texas Society of Professional Engineers): A professional organization for licensed engineers in Texas.

* Texas Water Association: Formerly known as the Texas Water Conservation Association.

* Texas Water Leaders: A leadership development program focused on water issues.

* Texas Water Trade: A non-profit organization facilitating water rights trading.

We also touched upon important topics such as:

* The role of water in corporate finance: Water is a significant cost factor for many industries, particularly agriculture.

* Water loss and auditing: New regulations are creating opportunities for professionals with expertise in water loss auditing.

* The importance of a competitive water market: Concerns were raised about the concentration of water rights in the hands of a few entities.

Our call to action:

We encourage everyone interested in water issues to become active and engaged members of the community. By asking questions, networking, and critically evaluating the information, we can collectively work towards a more sustainable water future.

Join the conversation!

We would love to hear your thoughts on the topics discussed in this episode. What are your experiences in the water sector? What challenges and opportunities do you see? Share your comments below!