
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Yugoslavia's carefully balanced political system began to unravel following Tito's death in 1980, revealing critical institutional weaknesses when facing economic crisis without a strong central authority. Without a supreme arbiter to break deadlocks, the collective presidency's representatives from eight regions struggled to reach consensus on addressing mounting economic problems, creating a governance vacuum that allowed nationalist sentiments to resurface.
Have feedback? Send us a Text and Interact with us!
Support the show
Twitter: @HistoryHelix
BlueSky: @historyhelix.bsky.social
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/Doublehelixhistory
Instagram: History_Helix
Email: [email protected]
Have feedback? Send us a Text and Interact with us!
Support the show
By Paul De La RosaYugoslavia's carefully balanced political system began to unravel following Tito's death in 1980, revealing critical institutional weaknesses when facing economic crisis without a strong central authority. Without a supreme arbiter to break deadlocks, the collective presidency's representatives from eight regions struggled to reach consensus on addressing mounting economic problems, creating a governance vacuum that allowed nationalist sentiments to resurface.
Have feedback? Send us a Text and Interact with us!
Support the show
Twitter: @HistoryHelix
BlueSky: @historyhelix.bsky.social
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/Doublehelixhistory
Instagram: History_Helix
Email: [email protected]
Have feedback? Send us a Text and Interact with us!
Support the show