
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Yugoslavia's carefully balanced political system began to unravel following Tito's death in 1980, revealing critical institutional weaknesses when facing economic crisis without a strong central authority. Without a supreme arbiter to break deadlocks, the collective presidency's representatives from eight regions struggled to reach consensus on addressing mounting economic problems, creating a governance vacuum that allowed nationalist sentiments to resurface.
Have feedback? Send us a Text and Interact with us!
Support the show
Twitter: @HistoryHelix
BlueSky: @historyhelix.bsky.social
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/Doublehelixhistory
Instagram: History_Helix
Email: [email protected]
Have feedback? Send us a Text and Interact with us!
Support the show
Yugoslavia's carefully balanced political system began to unravel following Tito's death in 1980, revealing critical institutional weaknesses when facing economic crisis without a strong central authority. Without a supreme arbiter to break deadlocks, the collective presidency's representatives from eight regions struggled to reach consensus on addressing mounting economic problems, creating a governance vacuum that allowed nationalist sentiments to resurface.
Have feedback? Send us a Text and Interact with us!
Support the show
Twitter: @HistoryHelix
BlueSky: @historyhelix.bsky.social
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/Doublehelixhistory
Instagram: History_Helix
Email: [email protected]
Have feedback? Send us a Text and Interact with us!
Support the show