
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In part 2 of my Theology Special with Pat Flynn where we are taking a deep-dive into a concept Pat and I came up with known as the Minimum Effective Apologetic. In part 1, Pat and I defined what our definition of the Minimum Effective Apologetic was and provided an overview of the philosophical and reason-based approach to theism, Christianity, and ultimately Catholicism.
In part 2, Pat and I discuss why atheism is utterly devoid of the concept of free will, why the arguments of Sam Harris for existentialism and morality based on the human good are flawed, and make a strong case for why theology matters.
By Pete GroehlerIn part 2 of my Theology Special with Pat Flynn where we are taking a deep-dive into a concept Pat and I came up with known as the Minimum Effective Apologetic. In part 1, Pat and I defined what our definition of the Minimum Effective Apologetic was and provided an overview of the philosophical and reason-based approach to theism, Christianity, and ultimately Catholicism.
In part 2, Pat and I discuss why atheism is utterly devoid of the concept of free will, why the arguments of Sam Harris for existentialism and morality based on the human good are flawed, and make a strong case for why theology matters.