Most arbitrations are derailed not by the facts of the case, but by what’s hidden, especially when it comes to third-party funding. If you don’t fully understand what needs to be disclosed and when, you’re risking conflicts, enforcement battles, and costly delays.

In this episode of The Dispute Brief, Augusta Shahin reveals the overlooked complexities of third-party funding disclosure. While Nigeria’s 2023 arbitration law legitimises funding and aligns with global best practices, many parties still fail to disclose key details like funder identities, settlement veto rights, and funding amendments at the right time. That minimalist approach opens the door to disputes over tribunal independence, security for costs, and enforcement vulnerabilities.

You’ll discover concrete frameworks: how Singapore’s ICC rules demand transparency about funders’ interests, and why timing matters more than ever. We break down the four biggest risks of non-disclosure from procedural challenges to failed enforcement , and share pragmatic checklists to stay ahead. Whether you're an in-house counsel, arbitrator, or investor, understanding the architecture of funding control is your best defense against avoidable disputes.

Failing to grasp these nuances could cost you not just in time and money, but in reputation. But with early, disciplined disclosure, you can protect the integrity of your arbitration and your business’s credibility. This episode is essential listening for anyone navigating complex disputes where funding plays a role.

Is your team prepared for the new transparency standards? Tune in to discover how to turn disclosure from a vulnerability into your strategic advantage.