A man calls 911. His roommate is dead. A home invasion, he claims. Two masked men. A struggle. A gunshot. The story is detailed, consistent, and entirely false. The detective notices one detail. The roommate was shot in the back of the head while sitting at the kitchen table. There was no struggle. There were no intruders. There was only the man on the phone.

In this JCS-inspired psychological breakdown, I analyze the interrogation of a man who murdered his roommate over a dispute about utility bills. The suspect arrived at the scene after the body was discovered, inserted himself into the investigation, and offered detailed theories about who might have committed the crime. But his language gave him away. He referred to the victim in the past tense before the medical examiner had officially pronounced him dead. He offered alibis that no one had asked for. He cried when he thought the detective was looking but stopped the moment the detective turned away. The interrogation lasted five hours. The suspect held out for four of them. Then a detective mentioned a single detail that had never been released to the public. The suspect's face went pale. He asked for a lawyer. The damage was done. The jury saw the tape.

Turn down the lights, put on your headphones, and press play because the roommate thought he was smarter than the room. He was never even close.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/red-tree-crime--6847553/support.