Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share TikTok Truce or Trojan Horse? Xi-Trump Call Spills Tea on Tech Tensions
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
TikTok Truce or Trojan Horse? Xi-Trump Call Spills Tea on Tech Tensions
This is your Beijing Bytes: US-China Tech War Updates podcast.
Listeners, fire up your VPNs—it's Ting at Beijing Bytes, here to decode the latest volleys in the digital trench war between the U.S. and China. We've seen more action these past two weeks than in an entire season of Mr. Robot, so let’s cut the preamble and jump right into the meat.
The story topping my virtual feeds: the high-stakes Trump-Xi phone call, as both leaders attempt a TikTok truce. Trump is working a deal that lets U.S. firms buy control of TikTok’s American operations, keeping that best-in-class algorithm licensed under strict terms. That’s supposed to ease U.S. national security hawks but steer clear of a total ban and, of course, score big political points for both sides. Xi, on the other hand, wants to remind D.C. that China still has the supply chain cards and could snap on tariffs, rare earth exports, or tech sanctions if pushed. Meanwhile, critics like Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi point out—algorithms and data aren’t going anywhere unless they’re “truly in American hands.” The TikTok saga is just a lens into a ground-shifting regulatory landscape: national security meets economic interdependence, with a dash of digital showmanship for the global audience.
But it’s not just TikTok. The Pentagon’s been cleaning house after that ProPublica exposé on Microsoft letting China-based engineers handle sensitive DoD cloud systems. Now, only personnel from non-adversarial countries can work on defense cloud tech. Every click, every line change, every digital “oops”—logged, tracked, attributed. Microsoft scrambled to comply, while Congress, especially Republicans, labeled the loophole “a national betrayal.” The Pentagon is running a hot investigation. In other words, the U.S. is raising a fortress around its cyber crown jewels and the moat just got deeper.
Let’s talk cyber ops: Just days ago, Chinese actors impersonated Rep. John Moolenaar, the House committee chair, launching a spear-phishing blitz targeting officials and major industries. This wasn’t some script kiddie hack—these emails looked legit, asking for input on draft sanctions bills and luring folks to click, reply, or forward. Even foreign governments got hit. The FBI and Capitol Police are all over it. The lesson? In this cyber war, trust can be weaponized as easily as malware, and the psychological game can hit harder than a zero-day exploit.
On the industry front, semiconductors are the battleground of choice. The U.S. slammed tighter export controls on advanced chips and added revenue-sharing strings for any AI chips Nvidia sells to China. China retaliated hard—huge antitrust headaches for Nvidia, $47.5 billion pumped into its semiconductor champions like Huawei and SMIC, and fresh export bans on minerals like gallium and germanium, jolting global supply chains. U.S. firms like Nvidia and AMD gripe about billions in lost revenue, while American supply chain managers are now obsessed with words like “friend-shoring” and “geographic diversification.” Southeast Asia is the new production darling as costs and regulatory headaches spiral. As a bonus, mature-node Chinese AI chips and local outfits are quietly picking up the slack.
On policy, Trump’s AI Action Plan got a July reboot to keep the U.S. AI edge sharp—crowding dollars into research, military colleges, and government R&D. As he dramatically put it, this “biggest tech challenge since the space race” is now a contest for civilization’s future. Meanwhile, China’s Made in China 2025 is at 50% chip self-sufficiency, well short of their 70% goal, but still making Western regulators nervous as progress in 7nm chips and subsidized AI platforms continues.
Looking forward, experts from Forbes and Bloomberg see more regulatory fragmentation and decoupling ahead. Investors are told to hedge risk, diversify, and ride the supply chain segmentation—AI, quantum, and niche chips are the new frontier. The tech cold war? It’s here, and it won’t be over by next quarter.
Thanks for tuning in—smash that subscribe button to stay one step ahead in the cybergap. This has been a quiet please production, for more check out quiet please dot ai.
For more http://www.quietplease.ai
Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta
This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
Listeners, fire up your VPNs—it's Ting at Beijing Bytes, here to decode the latest volleys in the digital trench war between the U.S. and China. We've seen more action these past two weeks than in an entire season of Mr. Robot, so let’s cut the preamble and jump right into the meat.
The story topping my virtual feeds: the high-stakes Trump-Xi phone call, as both leaders attempt a TikTok truce. Trump is working a deal that lets U.S. firms buy control of TikTok’s American operations, keeping that best-in-class algorithm licensed under strict terms. That’s supposed to ease U.S. national security hawks but steer clear of a total ban and, of course, score big political points for both sides. Xi, on the other hand, wants to remind D.C. that China still has the supply chain cards and could snap on tariffs, rare earth exports, or tech sanctions if pushed. Meanwhile, critics like Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi point out—algorithms and data aren’t going anywhere unless they’re “truly in American hands.” The TikTok saga is just a lens into a ground-shifting regulatory landscape: national security meets economic interdependence, with a dash of digital showmanship for the global audience.
But it’s not just TikTok. The Pentagon’s been cleaning house after that ProPublica exposé on Microsoft letting China-based engineers handle sensitive DoD cloud systems. Now, only personnel from non-adversarial countries can work on defense cloud tech. Every click, every line change, every digital “oops”—logged, tracked, attributed. Microsoft scrambled to comply, while Congress, especially Republicans, labeled the loophole “a national betrayal.” The Pentagon is running a hot investigation. In other words, the U.S. is raising a fortress around its cyber crown jewels and the moat just got deeper.
Let’s talk cyber ops: Just days ago, Chinese actors impersonated Rep. John Moolenaar, the House committee chair, launching a spear-phishing blitz targeting officials and major industries. This wasn’t some script kiddie hack—these emails looked legit, asking for input on draft sanctions bills and luring folks to click, reply, or forward. Even foreign governments got hit. The FBI and Capitol Police are all over it. The lesson? In this cyber war, trust can be weaponized as easily as malware, and the psychological game can hit harder than a zero-day exploit.
On the industry front, semiconductors are the battleground of choice. The U.S. slammed tighter export controls on advanced chips and added revenue-sharing strings for any AI chips Nvidia sells to China. China retaliated hard—huge antitrust headaches for Nvidia, $47.5 billion pumped into its semiconductor champions like Huawei and SMIC, and fresh export bans on minerals like gallium and germanium, jolting global supply chains. U.S. firms like Nvidia and AMD gripe about billions in lost revenue, while American supply chain managers are now obsessed with words like “friend-shoring” and “geographic diversification.” Southeast Asia is the new production darling as costs and regulatory headaches spiral. As a bonus, mature-node Chinese AI chips and local outfits are quietly picking up the slack.
On policy, Trump’s AI Action Plan got a July reboot to keep the U.S. AI edge sharp—crowding dollars into research, military colleges, and government R&D. As he dramatically put it, this “biggest tech challenge since the space race” is now a contest for civilization’s future. Meanwhile, China’s Made in China 2025 is at 50% chip self-sufficiency, well short of their 70% goal, but still making Western regulators nervous as progress in 7nm chips and subsidized AI platforms continues.
Looking forward, experts from Forbes and Bloomberg see more regulatory fragmentation and decoupling ahead. Investors are told to hedge risk, diversify, and ride the supply chain segmentation—AI, quantum, and niche chips are the new frontier. The tech cold war? It’s here, and it won’t be over by next quarter.
Thanks for tuning in—smash that subscribe button to stay one step ahead in the cybergap. This has been a quiet please production, for more check out quiet please dot ai.
For more http://www.quietplease.ai
Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta
This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
View all episodes
By Inception Point AiThis is your Beijing Bytes: US-China Tech War Updates podcast.
Listeners, fire up your VPNs—it's Ting at Beijing Bytes, here to decode the latest volleys in the digital trench war between the U.S. and China. We've seen more action these past two weeks than in an entire season of Mr. Robot, so let’s cut the preamble and jump right into the meat.
The story topping my virtual feeds: the high-stakes Trump-Xi phone call, as both leaders attempt a TikTok truce. Trump is working a deal that lets U.S. firms buy control of TikTok’s American operations, keeping that best-in-class algorithm licensed under strict terms. That’s supposed to ease U.S. national security hawks but steer clear of a total ban and, of course, score big political points for both sides. Xi, on the other hand, wants to remind D.C. that China still has the supply chain cards and could snap on tariffs, rare earth exports, or tech sanctions if pushed. Meanwhile, critics like Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi point out—algorithms and data aren’t going anywhere unless they’re “truly in American hands.” The TikTok saga is just a lens into a ground-shifting regulatory landscape: national security meets economic interdependence, with a dash of digital showmanship for the global audience.
But it’s not just TikTok. The Pentagon’s been cleaning house after that ProPublica exposé on Microsoft letting China-based engineers handle sensitive DoD cloud systems. Now, only personnel from non-adversarial countries can work on defense cloud tech. Every click, every line change, every digital “oops”—logged, tracked, attributed. Microsoft scrambled to comply, while Congress, especially Republicans, labeled the loophole “a national betrayal.” The Pentagon is running a hot investigation. In other words, the U.S. is raising a fortress around its cyber crown jewels and the moat just got deeper.
Let’s talk cyber ops: Just days ago, Chinese actors impersonated Rep. John Moolenaar, the House committee chair, launching a spear-phishing blitz targeting officials and major industries. This wasn’t some script kiddie hack—these emails looked legit, asking for input on draft sanctions bills and luring folks to click, reply, or forward. Even foreign governments got hit. The FBI and Capitol Police are all over it. The lesson? In this cyber war, trust can be weaponized as easily as malware, and the psychological game can hit harder than a zero-day exploit.
On the industry front, semiconductors are the battleground of choice. The U.S. slammed tighter export controls on advanced chips and added revenue-sharing strings for any AI chips Nvidia sells to China. China retaliated hard—huge antitrust headaches for Nvidia, $47.5 billion pumped into its semiconductor champions like Huawei and SMIC, and fresh export bans on minerals like gallium and germanium, jolting global supply chains. U.S. firms like Nvidia and AMD gripe about billions in lost revenue, while American supply chain managers are now obsessed with words like “friend-shoring” and “geographic diversification.” Southeast Asia is the new production darling as costs and regulatory headaches spiral. As a bonus, mature-node Chinese AI chips and local outfits are quietly picking up the slack.
On policy, Trump’s AI Action Plan got a July reboot to keep the U.S. AI edge sharp—crowding dollars into research, military colleges, and government R&D. As he dramatically put it, this “biggest tech challenge since the space race” is now a contest for civilization’s future. Meanwhile, China’s Made in China 2025 is at 50% chip self-sufficiency, well short of their 70% goal, but still making Western regulators nervous as progress in 7nm chips and subsidized AI platforms continues.
Looking forward, experts from Forbes and Bloomberg see more regulatory fragmentation and decoupling ahead. Investors are told to hedge risk, diversify, and ride the supply chain segmentation—AI, quantum, and niche chips are the new frontier. The tech cold war? It’s here, and it won’t be over by next quarter.
Thanks for tuning in—smash that subscribe button to stay one step ahead in the cybergap. This has been a quiet please production, for more check out quiet please dot ai.
For more http://www.quietplease.ai
Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta
This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
Listeners, fire up your VPNs—it's Ting at Beijing Bytes, here to decode the latest volleys in the digital trench war between the U.S. and China. We've seen more action these past two weeks than in an entire season of Mr. Robot, so let’s cut the preamble and jump right into the meat.
The story topping my virtual feeds: the high-stakes Trump-Xi phone call, as both leaders attempt a TikTok truce. Trump is working a deal that lets U.S. firms buy control of TikTok’s American operations, keeping that best-in-class algorithm licensed under strict terms. That’s supposed to ease U.S. national security hawks but steer clear of a total ban and, of course, score big political points for both sides. Xi, on the other hand, wants to remind D.C. that China still has the supply chain cards and could snap on tariffs, rare earth exports, or tech sanctions if pushed. Meanwhile, critics like Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi point out—algorithms and data aren’t going anywhere unless they’re “truly in American hands.” The TikTok saga is just a lens into a ground-shifting regulatory landscape: national security meets economic interdependence, with a dash of digital showmanship for the global audience.
But it’s not just TikTok. The Pentagon’s been cleaning house after that ProPublica exposé on Microsoft letting China-based engineers handle sensitive DoD cloud systems. Now, only personnel from non-adversarial countries can work on defense cloud tech. Every click, every line change, every digital “oops”—logged, tracked, attributed. Microsoft scrambled to comply, while Congress, especially Republicans, labeled the loophole “a national betrayal.” The Pentagon is running a hot investigation. In other words, the U.S. is raising a fortress around its cyber crown jewels and the moat just got deeper.
Let’s talk cyber ops: Just days ago, Chinese actors impersonated Rep. John Moolenaar, the House committee chair, launching a spear-phishing blitz targeting officials and major industries. This wasn’t some script kiddie hack—these emails looked legit, asking for input on draft sanctions bills and luring folks to click, reply, or forward. Even foreign governments got hit. The FBI and Capitol Police are all over it. The lesson? In this cyber war, trust can be weaponized as easily as malware, and the psychological game can hit harder than a zero-day exploit.
On the industry front, semiconductors are the battleground of choice. The U.S. slammed tighter export controls on advanced chips and added revenue-sharing strings for any AI chips Nvidia sells to China. China retaliated hard—huge antitrust headaches for Nvidia, $47.5 billion pumped into its semiconductor champions like Huawei and SMIC, and fresh export bans on minerals like gallium and germanium, jolting global supply chains. U.S. firms like Nvidia and AMD gripe about billions in lost revenue, while American supply chain managers are now obsessed with words like “friend-shoring” and “geographic diversification.” Southeast Asia is the new production darling as costs and regulatory headaches spiral. As a bonus, mature-node Chinese AI chips and local outfits are quietly picking up the slack.
On policy, Trump’s AI Action Plan got a July reboot to keep the U.S. AI edge sharp—crowding dollars into research, military colleges, and government R&D. As he dramatically put it, this “biggest tech challenge since the space race” is now a contest for civilization’s future. Meanwhile, China’s Made in China 2025 is at 50% chip self-sufficiency, well short of their 70% goal, but still making Western regulators nervous as progress in 7nm chips and subsidized AI platforms continues.
Looking forward, experts from Forbes and Bloomberg see more regulatory fragmentation and decoupling ahead. Investors are told to hedge risk, diversify, and ride the supply chain segmentation—AI, quantum, and niche chips are the new frontier. The tech cold war? It’s here, and it won’t be over by next quarter.
Thanks for tuning in—smash that subscribe button to stay one step ahead in the cybergap. This has been a quiet please production, for more check out quiet please dot ai.
For more http://www.quietplease.ai
Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta
This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI